TURKISH STUDENTS’ VIEWS ON NATURE OF SCIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1064Keywords:
nature of science, middle school science teaching, TurkeyAbstract
This paper explored students' views on nature of science using qualitative research techniques, mainly in-depth individual interviews. Sample consisted of 18 students enrolled on 7th grade in a small public school in northeastern Turkey. Findings revealed that students had mixed views on nature of science, as it is the case with the scientific community today. Students held contemporary views about some aspects of NOS and traditionalist views about other aspects. This study calls for improving the teaching of NOS in Turkish middle school science classrooms.
Article visualizations:
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. 1990. The Liberal Art of Science. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students’ conceptions of nature of science. Doctoral dissertation. Oregon State University
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal in Science Education, 22 (7), 665-701.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Cobern, W.W. (1993). College Students’ Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive World View Analysis, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 935-951.
Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Karakas, M. (2009). Cases of science professors’ use of nature of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 101-119.
Klopfer, L.E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87-95.
Lawson, A.E. (1999) What Should Students Learn About the Nature of Science and How Should We Teach It? Journal of College Science Teaching, 401-411.
Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 331-359.
Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
McComas, W. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Eds.). The Nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and Strategies, (pp.53-70). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schwab, J.J. (1958). The teaching of science as inquiry. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 14, 374-379.
Schwartz, R.S. & Lederman, N.G. (2002). ’It’s the nature of beast’: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205-236.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


