EXAMINATION OF ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY: A SURVEY ON PRE-SERVICE AND INSERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1196Keywords:
academic efficacy, ELT, pre-service, ın-serviceAbstract
Academic self–efficacy can be defined as person`s belief that he can successfully achieve at a desired level on an academic task or a specific goal (Schunk & Pajares, 2002). This study aims to investigate the level of academic self-efficacy levels of pre-service and in-service teachers. In this study problem solving skills and epistemological beliefs are evaluated as predictors of academic self-efficacy levels of pre-service and in-service groups. Each group is consisting of 40 people. The data gathered via online questionnaire form via link given in the Facebook group pages. The gathered data analyzed using regression, t-test and related descriptive analysis. The results show that epistemological beliefs and problem solving skills can predict the %14 for in-service English language teachers and this is %15 for pre-service English language teachers. Besides the results show that when the relationship between the gender and the other dependent factors there is only relation in pre-service teachers ‘academic self-efficacy and epistemological beliefs. The female participants have higher values than male ones.
Article visualizations:
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behaviour, 4, 71-81.
Ching, S. C., Myint, S. K., & Teo, T. (2006). Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: a survey among pre-service teachers in Singapore. Educational Media International, 43(4), 285-298. doi:10.1080/09523980600926242
Deryakulu, D., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Epistemolojik İnanç Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, 111-125.
Ekici, G. (2012). Akademik Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 174-185.
Heppner, H. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66-75. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66
Owen, S., & Froman, R. D. (1988). National Council on Measurement in Education. Development of a College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. New Orleans.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research, 66(4), 543-578.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of Beliefs about the Nature of Knowledge on Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
Schunk, D. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. J. E. Maddux içinde, Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: Theory, research and application (s. 281-303). New York: Plenum Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. D. H. Schunk içinde, Development of achievement motivation (s. 16-29). California, USA: Academic Press.
Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2002). The Development of Academic Self-Efficacy. (A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles, Dü) American Psychology Association, 15-31. doi:10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50003-6
Sharna, H. L., & Nasa, G. (2014, July). ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY: A RELIABLE PREDICTOR OF EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCES. British Journal of Education, 2(3), 57-64.
Şahin, N., Şahin, N. H., & Heppner, P. P. (1993). Psychometric Properties of Problem Solving Inventory in a Group of Turkish University Students. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4(17), 379-396.
Taylan, S. (1990). Heppner'in Problem Çözme Envanteri Uyarlama, Güvenirlik ve GEçerlik Çalışmaları. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
Yalmancı, S. G., & Aydın, S. (2014, Ağustos). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının akademik öz-yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 21-27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


