TURKISH AND ETHIOPIAN TEACHERS’ VIEWS ABOUT STUDENTS’ UNDESIRABLE BEHAVIOURS IN THE CLASSROOM AND THE TECHNIQUES THEY USE TO COPE UP WITH: A CASE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1203Keywords:
undesirable behaviours, classroom management, students’ behavioursAbstract
The overall purpose of this study was to identify teachers’ views about types and causes of students’ undesirable behaviours and the techniques they use to cope up with. This study is qualitative in nature, and in the pattern of a holistic multiple case study. To identify the schools, the researchers used convenience sampling technique. The work group was determined using maximum variable sampling. As a result, the working group consisted of four participants from Turkish school and four from Ethiopian school. The data were collected be a semi-structured questionnaire interviewing the participants face to face. The data were analysed by the help of computer program called Nvivo using content analysis technique. The observed behaviours common to both schools were being late, cheating, not doing the given tasks, talking without permission during the lesson, hyperactivity and lack of attention, complaining about their teacher to family, not paying attention to personal hygiene and being rude. On the other hand, In Ethiopia, attaching nickname to friends, picking up and leaving the class in the middle of lesson, eating and drinking at the wrong time, insulting and not sitting properly; in Turkey producing a variety of excuses and complaints, silence, selfishness, naughtiness, swearing, lack of interest in cultural activities and theatre play, smoking cigarettes secretly were undesirable behaviours determined peculiar to each culture. A close, positive and supportive relationship between all school stakeholders is essential for developing a mutual relationship of respect and for managing undesirable behaviours successfully.
Article visualizations:
References
Alemayehu, T. M. (2012). Assessment of students’ undesirable and coping strategies (in the case of Shashemene secondary school). Unpublished MA thesis. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University.
Amogne, E. (2014). İndiscipline Problems of High School Students: the Case of Ethio-Japan Hidasse Secondary School (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 37.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education. (6th. Ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Balay, R. & Sağlam, M. (2008). Sinif içi olumsuz davranişlara ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:V, Sayı:II, 1-24. Başar, H. (2001). Sınıf yönetimi. 5. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Borg, M. G., & Falzon, J. M. (1990). Teachers’ Perceptions of Primary School Children’s’ Undesirable Behaviours: The Effects of Teaching Experience, Pupil’s Age, Sex and Ability Stream. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 220-226.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th. Ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Çetin, B. (2015). Sınıfta İstenmeyen Öğrenci Davranışlarıyla İlgili Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 14(1), 255-269.
Dhaliwal, M. (2013).Teacher perceptions and management of challenging student behaviours in primary school classrooms. MA thesis-Unitec Institute of Technology.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Talent Development during the High School Years. Gifted Education International, 10 (2), 60-64.
Getiye, T., (2015). The Management of Students’ Disciplinary Problems in Government Secondary Schools of Guji Zone, Oromia Regional State. MA thesis; Haramaya University, Haramay, Ethiopia.
Kinde, G. & Mekonnen S (2006). Types, magnitude, predictors and controlling mechanisms of aggression in secondary schools of Jimma zone. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Science; 2(2), 52-61.
Kyriacou, L., Crawford, M. & Riches, C. (1997). Professional development for educational management. Buckingham: Open University Press. Oliveira, M. T. M. & Graça, A. (2013).Teachers Procedures Related to Students’ Misbehaviour in the Physical Education Lesson. Millenium, 45, 9-24.
Lewis, R. (1991). The discipline dilemma. Hawthorn: Australian council for educational research Ltd.
Shrigley, R. L. (1999). Strategies in Classroom Management. The National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 63, 428, 1-9.
Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd. Ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Suleman, Q., Hussain, I, Ambreen, S., (2013). Techniques used by secondary school teachers in managing classroom undesirable behaviour of secondary school students in Karak District, Pakistan. International Journal of Learning & Development, 3, 1.
Tan, E. & Yuansha, C. (1999). Discipline problems in schools: teachers’ perception. Teaching and Learning 19(2): 1-12.
Yilmaz, N. (2008). Dersin akişini bozan istenmeyen davranişlari yönetme stratejilerinin incelenmesi. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt-Sayı: 10-1.
Atıcı, M. (1999). An exploration of the relationships between classroom management strategies and teacher efficacy in English and Turkish primary school teachers. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Leicester University, UK
Başar, H. (1994). Sınıf yönetimi. Ankara: Pegem Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri.
Demirden, (1994).Effective approaches to classroom management in teaching English at secondary schools. Unpublished MA Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Özen, A., and Batu, S. (1999). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıf kontrolüne yönelik sorunlarının ve gereksinim duyduklari destek hizmet türlerinin belirlenmesi. 4th National Educational Sciences Proceedings, 1, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 1076, 308-315. Eskişehir.
Doyle, W. (1984). How order is achieved in a classroom: An Interim report. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, 259-277.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


