EXAMİNATION OF TRAINER COMMUNICATION SKILLS PERCEIVED BY ATHLETES ACCORDING TO SPORT FIELDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1238Keywords:
individual, team, trainer, communicationAbstract
This research is a descriptive study that aims to examine coach communication skills perceived by athletes according to branches. A total of 767 active athletes (517 male, 250 female) in Gaziantep were chosen as the study group on a volunteer basis. Quantitative data were collected using “Coach Communication Scale in Football” developed by Abakay and Kuru (2009) (in order to obtain research data). Data collected from the study group were analyzed and reported according to the athletes’ demographics and other variables discussed in the research. The data obtained from the scale were first transferred to the electronic environment and then calculated using SPSS 22.0 package program. Arithmetic mean, One-Way ANOVA, Spearman’s rho (rs) correlation test and t-test were used for analyzing the data, for comparing the mean scores in the unrelated measures, for examining the relationship between the variables, and for Independent samples, respectively. In conclusion, in this study we conducted to determine the coach communication skills perceived by the team – and individual athletes and to reveal the differences in terms of various variables, it was found that this ratio differed significantly between individual athletes while the coach communication skills perceived by two athlete groups were high. Our findings showed that the perceived coach communication skills tended to decline in situations where the sporting history of individual athletes increased. It has been established that their communication skills improved in the situations where educational background enhanced although there was also no gender difference in both sports groups. It has been concluded that the perceived coach communication skills also improved in the situations where it would tend to increase in some variables such as athlete’s age, coach’s age and duration of training with the same coach.
Article visualizations:
References
Abakay U. Futbolcu-Antrenör İletişiminin Farklı Statülerdeki Futbolcuların Başarı Motivasyonuyla İlişkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2010, 117 sayfa, Ankara (Emin KURU).
Abakay U., Kuru E. Coach Communication Scale in Football a Study of Validity and Reliablity. Ovidius University Annals Series Physical Education and Sport, Science Movement and Health: 2009. 9(1); 183-186,
Abakay, U. ve Kuru, E. Profesyonel ve Amatör Futbolcuların Antrenörleri İle Olan İletişim Farklılıklarının Karşılaştırılması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2011, 13(1):125-131
Alıncak F. (2016). Attıtudes Of Secondary School Students Includıng Physıcal Actıvıty Involvıng Playıng Games, European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 2(3):1-14.
Alıncak, F. (2017). Attitudes of primary school teachers towards playing games that involve physical activity. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(1), 202-216.
Alıncak F. (2016). Investigation of the Challenges of Physical Education Teacher Nominees to School Experience, Journal of Psychology & Behavıoral Studıes, 5(1): 1-6.
Alıncak F., Ayan S., Doğan İ., Abakay U. (2015). Expectations of Prospective Class Teachers From Physical Education and Game Teaching Lesson, Journal of Physical Education and Sports Management, 2(2):138-148.
Altıntaş, A., Çetinkalp Z. ve Aşçı H. Antrenör- Sporcu İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, (2012). 23(3), 119-128.
Ayan S., Ergin M., Alıncak F. (2017). The Evaluatıon Of The Partıcıpatıon Of Game And Physıcal Educatıon Lesson Of The Mıld Severe Degree Mental Retardatıon And Autıstıc Students, European Journal of Special Education Research, 2(2):35-49.
Cengiz R. İletişim. İstanbul: Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu Futbol Eğitim Yayınları 2009; (2); 45.
Gamgam H. Parametrik Olmayan İstatistiksel Teknikler. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Yayını No:140; 1998.
Güven Ö. 12-16 Yaş Grubu Sporcuların Müsabaka Motivasyonu ve Antrenör Davranışları Konusunda Karşılaştıkları Bazı Sorunlar. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 1996; 1(1): 29-40.
Karagöz Y, Ekici S. Sosyal Bilimlerde Yapılan Uygulamalı Araştırmalarda Kullanılan İstatistiksel Teknikler ve Ölçekler. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2004: 5(1); 25-43.
Lazar J. İletişim Bilimi. Çev: Anık C. 1.Baskı. Ankara. Vadi Yayınları; 2001.
Selağzı S., Çepikkurt F. Antrenör ve Sporcu İletişim Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi, CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2014: 9(1):11-18.
Turiel J. Communications Skills, Socio-Economical Statusand Age. İnformation Analysis Journal 1983; 11(9); 34-37.
Yılmaz İ. Sporcu Algıları Çerçevesinde Farklı Spor Branşlarındaki Antrenörlerin Liderlik Davranış Analizleri ve İletişim Beceri Düzeyleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2008, 219 sayfa, Ankara (Zafer ÇİMEN).
Yılmaz, İ., Çimen, Z. ve Bektaş F. Sporcu Algılamalarına Göre Bireysel ve Takım Sporu Antrenörlerinin İletişim Beceri Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2009, 4:45-48
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
