EVALUATION OF TPCK USAGE LEVELS IN MATERIALS DEVELOPED WITH STOP MOTION ANIMATION TECHNIQUE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1264Keywords:
course material development, science teacher candidates, self-efficacy, stop motion animation, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK)Abstract
During the course of their profession, teacher candidates are required to develop course materials in line with their course content. Development of course materials by teachers using their pedagogical content knowledge and technology is highly important in terms of providing an effective learning environment. The aim of the present study was to determine the extent to which science teacher candidates can use their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) while developing their course materials with the incorporation of stop motion animations. During the study, the survey method was used as a quantitative research method. The research population consisted of 62 teacher candidates from the Department of Science Teaching at the Manisa Celal Bayar University during the 2015-2016 academic year. The SPSS 18.0 software package was used for data analysis. Suggestions were made based on the results of the study.
Article visualizations:
References
Avcı T. 2014. Determining technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-confidence levels of science teachers. Master's thesis, Celal Bayar University
Babacan T. 2016. Effects of technology aided micro teaching practices on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) qualifications of prospective science teachers. Master's thesis, Celal Bayar University
Balçın M. D. 2016. Evaluation of science teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical content knowledge on material development process. Master's thesis, Manisa Celal Bayar University
Balçın M. D, Ergün A, 2016. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) Self-Efficacy Scale for Pre-service Science Teachers on Material Development: Development, Reliability and Validity Study. Turkish Journal of Education 5(3): 130-143.
Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılıç-Çakmak E, Akgün Ö. E, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. 2016. Scientific research methods, Ankara, Turkey.
Cox S. M, 2008. A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University
Eripek S. 2003. Special Education in Pre-school Period. Anadolu University Open Education Faculty Publication 756: 16-41.
Furniss M. 2008. Animation bible, London, England
Gergin A. 2015. The Effects of Model Making in the Process of Design, Production and Presentation of Art and Design. Yedi: Journal of Art, Design & Science 14(14): 157-168.
Gömleksiz M. N, Kan A. Ü, Serhatlıoğlu B. 2010. Prospective Teachers’ Opinions About the Effectiveness of Instructional Technology and Material Development Course to Have Them Acquire Principles of Material Preparing. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences 9(32): 1-16.
Graham R. C, Burgoyne N, Cantrell P, Smith L, St Clair L, Harris R. 2009. Measuring the TPACK Confidence of Inservice Science Teachers. TechTrends 53(5): 70-79
Hackbarth S. 1996. The educational technology handbook: A comprehensive guide: Process and products for learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Judge M, Hertzfeldt D. (Producers). 2004. Mike Judge and Don Hertzfeldt present: The Animation Show (Vol. 1). [DVD]. Available from MTV Home Entertainment. Retrieved from www.mtv.com/shows/the_animation_show/series.jhtml
Karamustafaoğlu O. 2006. Science and Technology Teachers’ Levels of Using Instructional Materials: Amasya Sample. Journal of Atatürk University Bayburt Education Faculty 1(1): 90-101.
Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2013). Primary science course (6th, 7th and 8th grades) curriculum]. Ankara, Turkey
Mishra P, Koehler M. J. 2006. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Integrating Technology in Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017-1054.
Öztürk M. K. 2002. The Importance and Usage of Educational Technology Devices and Materials in Geography Teaching in High Schools. Hacettepe University Jounal of Education 22: 126-129.
Purves B. 2010. Basics Animation 04: Stop-motion, 1st ed. London, England
Santucci W. 2009. The Guerrilla Guide to Animation: Making Animated Films Outside the Mainstream, New York
Selby A. 2009. Animation in process, London, England
Shulman L. S. 1986. Those Who Understand; Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2): 4-14.
Shulman L. S. 1987. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1): 1-22.
Sözen M. 2012. The transformation of narrative in animation cinema with the introduction of digital (computer generated) images. 2nd International Communication Symposium, 2nd-4th May, Kyrgyzstan-Turkey Manas University, Proceedings Book, pp. 599-609.
Taşar M. F, Timur B. 2010. Measuring competences of pre-service science teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Z. C Zacharia, C. P Constantinou, M Papaevripdou (Eds), In Computer Based Learning Science Conference Proceedings, pp. 279-291.
Taylor R. 1996. Encyclopedia of Animation Techniques, 1st ed. Philadelphia
Terpstra M. A. 2009. Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge: Preservice teachers' perceptions of how they learn to use educational technology in their teaching. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University
Timur B. 2011. The development of pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge in force and movement subjects. Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University
Wells P. 2006. Fundamentals of animation, 1st ed. London, England
Yalın H. İ. 2008. Teaching technologies and material development, Ankara, Turkey
Yanpar Şahin T, Yıldırım S. 1999. Teaching technologies and material development, Ankara, Turkey
Yetkin Özdemir İ. E. 2008. Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Cognitive Skills on Using Manipulatives in Teaching Mathematics. Hacettepe University Jounal of Education 35: 362-373.
Yurdigül Y, Zinderen İ. E. 2011. Special Effect on the Cinema. Atatürk Communication 1(2): 101-125.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
