THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LESSON PLAN INSTRUMENTS ON LIVING CREATURES INTERACTIONS WITH ITS ENVIRONMENT THROUGH GUIDED INQUIRY BASED LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1564Keywords:
effectiveness, RPP set, the interactions of living creatures with its environmentAbstract
A survey result by Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in 2015 shows that Indonesia students are ranked on 62 of 70 countries on the natural science subject. On average, Indonesian students still have problems on answering questions that require the critical thinking ability. The Lesson Plan used by the teachers is in line with the 2013 Curriculum but shows no sign of developing the critical thinking ability and the learning results on the students. This research aims to determine the effectiveness of lesson plan set on the subject matter of living creatures’ interactions with its environment. This research used the Tessmer Model with the steps of self-evaluations, experts’ opinions, individual tests, small groups tests, and field tests as the research’s focus. The subjects are VII grade students of SMP Negeri 1 KertakHanyar. Data types including 1) critical thinking ability result, 2) cognitive learning result, 3) attitude assessment result, and 4) ability assessment result. The results of critical thinking ability are analyzed using LKPD with the quantitative rubric, the results of cognitive learning through tests are analyzed based on Minimum Completeness Criteria, the results of attitude assessment are analyzed using attitude assessment rubric. The result of RPP set is considered effective based on 1) the critical thinking ability result of the students is categorized as high, 2) the students’ learning result passed the classical completeness of 75% of the students, 3) the attitude assessment result is categorized as good, and 4) the ability assessment result is categorized as good.
Article visualizations:
References
Akbar, S.2013.Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Arikunto, S. 2001. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Akasara.
Asni & D. Novita. 2015. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Siswa pada Materi laju Reaksi. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education. 4(1), pp.11-17.
Azizmalayeri, K., Jafari., M, E., Sharif, M., Asgari, M., & M. Omidi. 2012. The Impact of Guided Inquiry Methods of Teaching on the Critical Thinking of High School Students. Journal of Education and Practice. 3 (10),pp.42-47.
Beaumont, J. 2010. A Sequence of Critical Thinking Tasks. Tesol Journal 1(4). Pp.1-22.
Brown, S. D. 2010. A Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Approach to Teaching Medicinal Chemistry. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74 (7), 121.
Duran, M. & D. İlbilge. 2016. The Effect of the Inquiry-Based Learning Approach on Student’s Critical-Thinking Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016.12(12), pp.2887-2908.
Ennis, R. H. 2001. Goals for a Critical Thinking Curriculum and Its Assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 3rd Edition. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD. Critical Thinking Assessment. Ohio: Journal Theory Intro Practice, 32 (3).
Facione, P.A, Facione, N.C., & C. A. Giancarlo. 2000. The Disposition toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement And Relationship To Critical Thinking. Informal Logic. 20 (1).
Gorria, A. 2016. PISA 2015 Result in Focus. OECD Organization.
Jaya, I. M., I. W. Sadia, & I.B.P.Arnyana. 2014. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Bermuatan Pendidikan Karakter Dengan Setting Guided Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA. 4, pp.1-12.
Kariawan, I. G., I. W. Sadia, & N. M. Pujani. 2015. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Setting Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Kemampuan Bepikir Kritis Siswa SMA. E-journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. 5, pp.1-11.
Kemendikbud. 2014. Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. https://kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/dokumen/Paparan/Paparan%20Wamendik.pdf.
Kong, S. C. & W. M. W. So. 2008. A study of building a resource-based learning environment with the inquiry learning approach: Knowledge of family trees. Computers & Education.50,pp.37–60.
Löhner, S., van Joolingen, W.R., Savelsbergh, E.R. & B. V. Hout-Wolters. 2005. Students’ reasoning during modeling in an inquiry learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), pp.441-461.
Matthew, B & I. O. Kenneth. 2013. “A Study on the Effects of Guided Inquiry Teaching Method on Students Achievement in Logic”. Journal International Researches. 2 (10), pp.135-140.
McBride, J.W., Bhatti, M.I., Hannan, M.A. & M. Feinberg. 2012. Using an inquiry approach to teach science to secondary school science teachers. Physics education. 39(5), pp.434.
Nur, M. 2013. Kumpulan Instrumen Penelitian Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi. UNESA Penelitian Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi .
Opara, J.A. & N. S. Oguzor. 2011. “Inquiry Instruction Method and the School Science Curriculum”. Journal of Social Science. 3 (3), pp.188-198.
Permendikbud. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. http://abkin.org/download/permendikbud-nomor-81a-tahun-2013- tentang-implementasi-kurikulum.pdf.
Plomp. T. & N. Nieveen. 2013. Educational Design Research. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds), Part A: An Introduction, Enschede, the Nederlands: SLO.
Robyn M. G., Kim N., Gilbert B., & M. Haynes. 2014. Primary students’ scientific reasoning and discourse during cooperative inquiry-based science activities. International Journal of Educational Research. 63. Pp.127–140.
Schaal, S., Matt, M., & G. Sonja. 2012. Pembelajaran Mobile dan Keanekaragaman Hayati-Mobile Learning and Biodiversity – Bridging the Gap between Outdoor and Inquiry Learning In Pre-Service Science Teacher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.46, pp.2327-2333.
Sudjana, N. 2014. Penilaian Hasil Proses Pembelajaran. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Suhadi. 2007. Model Pembelajaran inovatif Berorientasi Konstrutivistik. Surabaya: Prestasi Pustaka.
Sutama, I. N., Ida B. P A. & Ida B. J. S. 2014. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kinerja Ilmiah pada Pelajaran Biologi Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 2 Amplapura. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, 02.
Tessmer, M.1998. Planning and Conducting-Formative Evaluations. London, Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Yana. 2015. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi SMA Topik Protista Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing.Tesis. Banjarmasin: Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.
Yarmalinda, D. 2017. Penerapan Guided Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis pada Materi Ekosistem dalam Menghadapi MEA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains PPs Unesa. 14 Januari 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
