EXAMINATION OF ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION ACTIVITIES OF SECONDARY SCHOOL 9TH AND 10TH GRADE PHYSICS TEXTBOOKS IN TERMS OF REVISED BLOOM TAXONOMY AND SCIENCE LITERACY COMPETENCE LEVELS: THE SAMPLE OF TURKEY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1891Keywords:
physics education, assessment and evaluationAbstract
The purpose of this research is to examine assessment and evaluation activities of secondary school 9th and 10th grade physics textbooks in Turkey according to the revised Bloom Taxonomy and PISA science literacy competence levels. In this study document review, a qualitative research method was used. Within the scope of the study, assessment tools of 9th and 10th grade secondary school physics textbooks which are recommended by the Ministry of Education (Turkey) to be used in the 2017-2018 academic year were examined. As a result of the study, assessment and evaluation activities of 9th and 10th grade physics textbooks were found to meet generally 1, 2, 3 and 4 levels of PISA Science literacy competence levels. Moreover, when the same activities were examined according to the revised Bloom Taxonomy, the vast majority of the assessment activities are at the factual and conceptual level of the knowledge accumulation dimension, and at the applying and understanding sub-dimensions of the cognitive process dimension.
Article visualizations:
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., (Eds.) Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J. ve Wittrock, M. C. (2010). Öğrenme Öğretim ve Değerlendirme ile İlgili birSınıflama (A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing). (Çev: D. A. Özçelik). Ankara: Pegem
Anderson, L. W., ve Krathwohl, D. R. (Ed.). (2014). Öğrenme Öğretim ve Değerlendirme ile İlgili Bir Sınıflama: Bloom’un Eğitimin Hedefleri İle İlgili Sınıflamasının Güncelleştirilmiş Biçimi. (D. A. Özçelik, Çev.) (2. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Ayvacı, H. Ş. ve Türkdoğan, A. (2010). Yeniden Yapılandırılan Bloom Taksonomisine Göre Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Yazılı Sorularının İncelenmesi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7, 1, ss. 13-25.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 4, ss. 212-264.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning, Theory into Practice, 41 (4), 226-232.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2005). PISA 2003 Araştırması Ulusal Nihai Raporu, T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2010). PISA 2006 Araştırması Ulusal Nihai Raporu, T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2015). PISA 2012 Araştırması Ulusal Nihai Raporu, T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2016). PISA 2015 Ulusal Raporu, T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara
Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


