INTERNET ACCESS AND USAGE: IMPACT ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN SOCIAL STUDIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1892Keywords:
internet, internet access, internet usage, impact, academic performance, secondary school, social studiesAbstract
The study investigated the impact of Internet access and usage on students’ academic performance in Social Studies. The study adopted a correlational research design. The population consisted of 55,303 male and female JSS II students from which 576 students were selected. The instrument for the study was the questionnaire and students’ academic records. The data collected were analysed using correlational statistics. The result of the study revealed that there is significant relationship between internet usage for academic work and students’ academic performance; there is significant relationship between internet access and usage and students’ assignment submission; there was significant relationship between time spent on the internet and students’ academic performance. It was recommended that students should use the internet to enhance their academic performance of which they should restrict themselves from non-academic purposes; teachers should evolve regulations to guide the extent of Internet usage to avert over dependency among students.
Article visualizations:
References
Ahmed, I. & Qazi. T. F. (2011). A look out for academic impacts of social networking sites (SNSs). African Journal of Business Management. 5(12), 5022-5031.
Anand, V. (2007). A study of time management: The correlation between video game usage and academic performance markers. Cyber Psychology & Behaviour, 10(4), 552-559.
Anderson, K. J. (2009). Internet use among college students: An exploratory study. American College Health, (50), 21–206
Asdaque, M. M., Khan, M. N. & Rizvi, S. A. A. (2010). Effect of internet on the academic performance and social life of university students in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Sociology, 21-27.
Beida, O. (2008). Internet use, abuse or dependence: A study of its mental health implications among students of university of Maiduguri. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri.
Bellamy, A. & Hanewicz, C. (2001). An exploratory analyses of the social nature of internet addiction. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5(3), 36-49.
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2), 1–12. (ED 053 419)
Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1996). Universities in the digital age. Change, 28(4): 11-19.
Carvin, A. (2006). Does home internet access improve academic achievement? PBS Teachers Source.
Chan, K. & Fang, W. (2007). Use of internet and traditional media among young people. Young Consumers, 8(4), 244-256.
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impacts of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222-1232
Chen, Y. F., & Peng, S. S. (2008). University students' Internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 11, 467-469. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0128.
Chen, S. Y. & Tzeng, J. Y. (2010). College female and male heavy Internet users’ profiles of practices and their academic grades and psychosocial adjustment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 257-262.
Computer Industry Almanac Inc (2002). USA tops 160m internet users. Retrieved 22/05/2018 from http://www.C-I-A.com/pr/202.htm
Cox, W. F. (2008). Relationship between locus of control and internet related problems among teenagers. Social Behaviour and Personality, 6, 191-194.
Cull, B. (2011). Reading revolution: online digital texts and implications for reading in academics. First Monday Peer reviewed Journal on the Internet, 16, 6-6.
Davis, S. F (2008). An examination of internet usage on two college campuses. College Student Journal, (33), 257 – 260.
Fatoki, O. C. (2004). Impact of library resources and the internet on undergraduate students’ research, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Nigerian Libraries, 3 8(1), 21-33.
Fox, A. B., Rosen, J. & Crawford, M. (2009). Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 12(1), 51-53.
Geri Gay & Michael Grace-Martin (2001). Wireless web browsing and academic performance evaluation of web browsing data showed mixed effects of browsing behavior on student performance. Educational Technology & Society, 4(3), 95-107.
Griffiths, M. (1996). Internet “Addiction”: An issue for clinical psychology? Clinical Psychology Forum, 97, 32-36.
Jagboro, K. O. (2003). A study of internet usage in Nigerian universities: A case study of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. First Monday, Special issue 8.
Jacobsen, W. C. & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyber psychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280.
Jones, S. (2002). The internet goes to college: how students are living in the future with today's technology. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved 22/05/2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports
Junco, R. (2012b). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 187-198.
Karpinski, A. C. & Duberstein, A. (2009). A description of facebook use and academic performance among undergraduate and graduate students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, Calif. 15.
Kaye, B. K. & Johnson, T. J. (2004). Web for all reasons: uses and gratifications of internet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics, 21(3), 197—223.
Keith, N. H. & Barry, W. (1999). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?: social networks, participation, and community commitment. Journal of American Behavioural Scientist, 45(3), 436-455. doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955290
Kirschner, P. A. & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computer in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1237–1245.
Kolek, E. A. & Saunders, D. (2008). Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. NASPA Journal, 45(1), 1–25,
Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J. & Barrows, J. R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 366-382.
Lam, L. T., Peng, Z., Mai, J.-c., & Jing, J. (2009). Factors associated with Internet addiction among adolescents. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(5), 551–555.
LaRose, R., Lin, C. A. and Eastin, M. S. (2003). Unregulated internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, 5, 225 -253.
Lubans, J. (1999). Key findings on internet use among students. Retrieved May, 3rd 2018, from http://www.lubans.org/docs/key/key.html
Misra, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S. & Scherlis, W. (1995). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017.
Mutz, D., Roberts, D. F. & van Vuuren, D. P. (1993). Reconsidering the displacement hypothesis: Television’s influence on children’s time use. Communication Research, 20, 51-75.
Neuman, S. (1991). Literacy in the television age. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
Ogedebe, P. M. (2012) Internet usage and students’ academic performance in Nigeria tertiary institutions: A case study of university of Maiduguri. Academic Research International, 2(3), 334-343.
Ojedokun, A. A. (2009). Internet access and usage by students of the University of Botswana. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 11(2), 97 - 107.
Papacharissi, Z. & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet usage. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.
Paul, J. A., Baker, H. M. & Cochran, J. D. (2012). Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(6), 2117-2127
Pychl, T. A. (2008). Facebook- A whole new world of wasting time. Psychology Today. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved May, 3rd 2018, from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/don’t delay/200804/facebook-whole-new-world-wasting-time
Rainie, L. & Packel, D. (2001). More online, doing more. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved 22/09/2015 from http://www.pewlntcrnet.org/pdfs/PIPChanging_Population.pdf
Reynol, J., Merson, D. & Salter, D. W. (2010). The effect of gender, ethnicity, and income on college students’ use of communication technologies”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(6), 619–627.
Rosen, L., Carrier, L. & Cheever, N. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media induced task-switching while studying. ELSEVIER, 955, 948-950.
Scherer, K. (1997). College life on-line: healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College and Student Development, 38(6), 655-663.
Scott, C. (2004). Regulatory innovation and the online consumer. Law & Policy, 26, 477-506. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2004.00187.x
Shejwal, B. R. & Purayidathil, J. (2006). Television viewing of higher secondary students: does it affect their academic achievement and mathematical reasoning? Psychology and Developing Societies, 8, 201-213.
Song, I., LaRose, R., Eastin, M. & Un, C. (2004). Internet gratifications and internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 7(4), 384-394.
Whyte, C. (2008). An integrated counselling and learning assistance centre. New Directions Sourcebook-Learning Assistance Centres. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Zha, Y., Lei, J. & Conway, P. (2006). A global perspective on political definitions of e-learning: commonalities and differences in national educational technology strategy discourses. In Weiss, J. & Nolan, J. & Hunsinger, J. & Trifonas, P. (Ed). The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


