EXAMINATION OF PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF PLAYGROUND OF PRE-SCHOOL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: EXAMPLE OF İZMİR PROVINCE, TURKEY

Authors

  • Elif Kurşunlu Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Ankara, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1987

Keywords:

pre-school education, playgrounds, educational environments, playground organizations, playground park zone, playground agricultural land, physical environment

Abstract

One of the indicators that reveals the quality of education system in a country is the physical quality of environments that education is presented. The applicability of education programmes can only be possible with the existence of physical environments organized in proper conditions. However when education environment is said, only school buildings and classrooms come to mind will be wrong. As well as school buildings when playgrounds are effectively organized, they can turn out to be a rather efficient education environment. Especially today for children who are imprisoned in concrete constructions in city life, organizing playgrounds effectively for education is an important necessity on several counts. The aim of this research is to identify physical properties of playgrounds of formal pre-school education institutions in İzmir province and contribute to amendment efforts that will be done about this subject. Since descriptive method was used in the research, current situation was analysed. Formal pre-school education institutions of the Ministry of National Education (MEB) in İzmir province formed the population of research. In sampling choice, stratified sampling method was used; each institution types of MEB giving pre-school education were accepted as a category. Accordingly, playground properties of totally 50 institutions consisted of 16 formal independent kindergarten, 24 kindergarten subsidiary of primary school and 10 practice kindergarten subsidiary of vocational high school, were identified. As data collection tool “Physical Properties of Playground Observation Form” prepared by researcher, was used. This form is in a mixed structure consisted of control list, likert type items and open-ended observation items. Content validity of assessment instrument was calculated by Miles & Huberman percentage of consent method as well as basing on opinions of specialists and it was found as .92. In analysis of quantitative data percentage, frequency and average calculations were done and the findings were presented as tables. In analysis of qualitative data, descriptive analysis method was used. According to results of research, the playgrounds of pre-school education institutions have insufficient largeness. Almost all playgrounds have concrete floor and there are no educational organizations suitable to development of children. Another remarkable finding is there is no playground separated for kindergarten in most of primary schools and vocational high schools. These results draw attention to the necessity of organizing playgrounds more effectively.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Aksoy, Y. (2011). Çocuk oyun alanları üzerine bir araştırma İstanbul, Isparta, Eskişehir, Erzurum, Kayseri, Ankara, Zonguldak ve Trabzon illeri örneği. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 6, 82-106.

Aksu, Ö. ve Demirel, V. (2011). Trabzon kenti ilköğretim okul bahçelerinde tasarım ve alan kullanımları. SDÜ Orman Fakültesi Dergisi. 12, 40-46.

California Department of Education- CDE (2002). A Child’s garden of standards. ISBN 0-8011-1579-5.

Clements, R. (2004). An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. 5(1) 68-80.

Cohen J. A (1960). Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 20, 37-46.

Coyle, J.K. (2010). Back to school: Back outside. Create high performing students. National Wildlife Federation. Erişim tarihi: 15.09.2017, https://www.nwf.org/pdf/Be%20Out%20There/Back%20to%20School%20full%20 report.pdf

Danks, S. G. (2010). Asphalt to ecosystems. Design ideas for schoolyard transformation: USA. ISBN-978-0-9766054-8-5.

Demiriz, S. ,Ulutaş, İ. ve Karadağ, A. (2011). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında eğitim ortamı ve donanım. Anı Yayıncılık: Ankara.

Dodge, D. T., Colker, L. J. ve Heroman, C. (2008). The creative curriculum for preschool. Teaching Strategies Inc: Washington.

Gardner, H. (1991). The tensions between education and development. Journal of Moral Development. 20(2), 113-125.

Gay, L.R., Mills, G. E. Ve Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research. Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson Published: USA.

Güleş, F. (2013). Okulöncesi eğitimde fiziksel çevreye ilişkin kalite standartlarının belirlenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi Bilim Dalı, Konya.

Kalburan, N. C. (2014). Denizli ilinde bulunan resmi ve özel anaokulu bahçelerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 18, 99-113.

Karatekin, K. ve Çetinkaya, G. (2013). Okul bahçelerinin çevre eğitimi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Manisa ili örneği. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 6(27). 307-315.

MEB (2011). Özel öğretim kurumları standartlar yönergesi. Erişim tarihi: 11.12.2017, http://ookgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_08/17030121_standartyonergesi .pdf

Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Nair, M. (2014).The classroom is obsolete: It’s time for something new. Education Week. Erişim tarihi: 03.03.2018, http://www.fieldingnair.com/wp- content/uploads/2015/05/The_Classroom_is_Obsolete-Ed-Week.pdf.

New Jersey School Outdoor Area Working Group (2007). Schoolyard planing and design in New Jersey. Enhancing outdoor play and learning. Erişim tarihi: 05.04.2018, http://www.edlawcenter.org/assets/files/pdfs/facilities/SchoolyardPlanning_Desi gn.pdf

Oğuzkan, Ş. ve Oral, G. (2003). Okul Öncesi Eğitimi. Milli Eğitim Basımevi: İstanbul.

Önal, Z. ve Adal, E. (2014). Çocukluk Çağında Obezite. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi 30(1).39-44. doi:10.5222/otd.supp1.2014.039

Sobel, D. (2016) (Ed.). Nature preschools and forest kindergartens. The handbook for outdoor learnings. Redleaf Press: USA.

Spencer, H. K. Ve Wright, P. M. (2014). Quality outdoor play space for young children. Young Children. 69(5), 28-36.

White, R. (2004). Interaction with nature during the middle year: It’s importance to children’s development & nature’s future. White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group: USA.

Woolner, P. (2010). The design of learning space. Continuum International Publishing Group: London.

Yenice, M. S. (2013). İlköğretim okulları için mekânsal yeterlilik analizi. Burdur örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 28(3), 430-439.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-09

Issue

Section

Articles