STUDENTS’ READING-RELATED FACTORS AS PREDICTORS OF ACHIEVEMENT IN ENGLISH READING COMPREHENSION IN LAGELU LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, OYO STATE, NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2155Keywords:
students’ interest, availability of reading materials, English reading comprehension, academic achievement, secondary school, Lagelu LGAAbstract
Secondary school students are reportedly deficient in English language reading comprehension, and this partly accounts for the poor results recorded in English language at public examinations. Studies indicate that some students really have low interest in reading, just as a number of researchers have queried availability of reading materials for students’ poor achievement in reading comprehension. The argument is that availability and use of appropriate instructional resources will tend to facilitate effective learning in schools. Thus, the study examined students’ interest in reading and availability of reading materials as they relate to and predict students’ achievement in English reading comprehension in Lagelu Local Government Area (LGA) of Oyo State, Nigeria. Survey research design of the correlational type was adopted for the study, which was guided by four research questions. The study population comprised SSS II students in this LGA. Five secondary schools were randomly selected; and a simple random technique was used to select 40 students from each school, thus, a total of 200 participants in the study. Three properly validated instruments – English Reading Comprehension Achievement Test, Students’ Interest in Reading Scale, and Availability and Utilization of English Reading Materials’ Inventory – were used to gather data, which was analyzed using frequency count, percentage, Pearson product moment correlation and multiple regressions. Results show that the current level of students’ achievement in English reading comprehension is generally low. There is no significant relationship between students’ interest in reading and academic achievement (r=0.04, p>0.05). There is a statistically significant and positive relationship between reading materials and students’ achievement (r=0.14, p<0.05). A linear relationship exists among the variables in the study, R=0.14, R2=0.02 and Adj. R2=0.01. However, availability of reading materials [β=0.14, t(200)=1.93, p<0.05] is a potent and significant predictor of achievement in English reading comprehension. The study concludes that students’ interest in reading and availability of reading materials are significantly related to students’ achievement in English reading comprehension, though only reading materials could substantially predict students’ achievement in reading comprehension. Governments should increase reading materials in schools. There should be adequate and regular supervision of the use of instructional materials in all schools to enhance effective teaching and learning towards boosting students’ achievement. Teachers should always try their best to make use of available instructional materials, or improvise, to make lessons more interesting. Principals should provide teachers with enabling environment for the use of available instructional materials to make learning more meaningful.
Article visualizations:
References
Adesulu, D. (2014) Mass Failure as WAEC releases May/June Exam Results. Retreived from www.vanguardngr.com.
Aina, J.K., Ogundele, G. A. and Olanipekun, S. S. 2014. Causes of Poor Performance in West African School Certificate Examination (WASCE) in Nigeria. Education Department, College
Akinsolu, A.O. (2010). Teachers and Students’ Academic Performance in Nigerian Secondary Schools: Implications for Planning. Florida Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. 86-103.
Birsch, J.R. (2011). Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language Skills, Third Edition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
Block, C.C. (2004). Teaching Comprehension: The Comprehension Approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education
Block, C.C. 2004. Teaching Comprehension: The Comprehension Approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education
Bowyer-Grane, C. and Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (2), pp. 189–201.
Bråten, I. (2007). “Leseforståelse – komponenter, vansker og tiltak.” Bråten, I. (red.). Leseforståelse. Lesing i kunnskapssamfunnet – teori og praksis. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske forlag.
Fakeye, David. (2010). Students’ personal variables as correlates of academic achievement in English as a second language in Nigeria. Journal of Socical Sciences. 22(3) 205-211
Graves, M.F., Juel, C. and Graves, B.B. (1998). Teaching Reading in the 21st Century. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher’s perspective on the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation.
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 3, 191-209.
Hidi, S. and Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness—A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 179–194.
Hidi, S. and Renninger, A. K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 111-127.
Hidi, S., Berndorff, D. and Ainley, M. (2002). Children’s argument writing, interest and self-efficacy: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 12, 429-446.
Junias, R. 2009.Factors Affecting the Teaching of English Reading Skills in a Second Language of Grade 3 Learners. Master of Education with Specialization in Early Childhood Development University of South Africa
Kamil, L., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D. and Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III. New York: Longman.
Kolawole, C.O.O. (2005). The state of reading in some selected secondary schools in South- Western Nigeria: A preliminary report. In Issues in Language, Communication and Language. A book of reading in honour of Okedara, C. A. (Eds) A. Dada, A. Abimbade and C.O.O. Kolawole. Ibadan: Counstellation Books.
Lindsay, C. and Knight, P. 2007. Learning and teaching English. New York: Oxford University Press.
N’Namdi, K.A. 2005. Guide to teaching reading at the primary school level. UNESCO:
Osunde and Ogiegbaen, 2005.Aassessement of factors associated with students poor performance in senior school certificate English language in Nigeria. Language in India.
Pardo, L.S. 2004. What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58 (3), 272–280.
Pressley, M. 2000. Comprehension Instruction: What Makes Sense Now, What Might Make Sense Soon? Reading online, 5(2). Questionnaire-Based Survey. Education and Development, Research and Practice (EDRP)Vol. 1, No. 1, (2014), October, pp. 1- 7. On behalf of “The Education Sciences Faculty” U.SV.
Renninger, K.A., 2000. Individual interest and itsimplications for understanding intrinsic motivation.In Sansone, C., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (eds.),Intrinsic Motivation: Controversies and NewDirections. Academic Press, New York, 373– 404.
Schiefele, U. 1998. Individual interest and learning, whatwe know and what we don’t know. In Hoffman, L., Krapp, A., Renninger, K., and Baumert, J. (eds.),Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the SeeonConference on Interest and Gender, IPN, Kiel, Germany, 91–104.
Snow, C., Sweet, A.P., Alvermann, D.E., Kamil, M.L. and Stricland, D.S. 2002. Formulating a research agenda about reading for understanding. In A.M. Roller (Ed.) Comprehensive Reading Instruction across the Grade Levels. A collection
of papers from the Reading Research 2001 Conference (pp. 88–110). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Teachernet 2008. Creating a learning environment for the 21st century. http://www.teachernetgov.uk/teachingandlearninglibrary
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


