WHAT CYPRIOT CHILDREN THINK ABOUT THE CONCEPT OF PEACE?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2172Keywords:
children, Cyprus, peace, metaphor, perceptionAbstract
Cyprus is a Mediterranean island inhabited by two communities with a common culture, although they speak different languages. Since 1974, efforts to reconcile these two communities, living apart from each other in different parts of the island, have become more important in recent years and efforts have been made to ensure a lasting solution on the island. Within the scope of these efforts, non-governmental organizations in Cyprus are also carrying out various studies with the support of the European Union. This is one of those studies, which was carried out with the support of the Grow Civil Program. The purpose of this study is to examine the metaphors of the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot children created about the concept of peace. The study group consists of 23 children, aged between six and ten. Children were given a form written in Turkish and Greek languages with an expression on it as "Peace is like........ because.........." and they were asked to fill in the gaps. The obtained data were analyzed and reported by the content analysis method. Results indicate that the metaphors produced by Turkish Cypriot children are related to emotions, behaviors and individuals, while the Greek Cypriots’ are related to space, aesthetic perception, and individuals. While politicians are seeking for a permanent solution on the island, non-governmental organizations and activists have been organizing various activities to increase mutual trust between the two communities. It is thought that this study will contribute to the bi-communal studies in Cyprus.
Article visualizations:
References
Alvik, T. (1968). The development of views on conflict, war, and peace among school children: A Norwegian case study. Journal of Peace Research, 5(2), 171-194.
Biaggio, A.M.B., De Souza, L.K., & Martini, R.M.F. (2004). Attitudes toward peace, war and violence in five countries. Journal of Peace Education, 1(2), 179-189.
Buhrmester, D. & Furman, W. (1986). The changing functions of friendship in childhood: A neo-sullivan perspective. In V.J. Derlega & B.A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 41-62). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cooper, P. (1965) The development of the concept of war. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 1–16.
Dungen, P., & Yamane, K. (2015). Peace education through peace museums. Journal of Peace Education, 12(3), 213-222.
Forceville, C. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(1), 1-14.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
Groff, L. (2002). A holistic view of peace education. Social Alternatives, 21(1), 7–10.
Gürkan, T., Bayram, D., & Arslan, B. (2008, September). The feelings and ideas of primary students about peace. 13th World Conference in Education, World Council for Curriculum and Instruction, Antalya.
Hakvoort, I. (1996). Children’s conceptions of peace and war: A longitudinal study. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2(1), 1-15.
Hakvoort, I., & Oppenheimer, L. (1993). Children and adolescents’ conceptions of peace, war, and strategies to attain peace: A Dutch case study. Journal of Peace Research, 30(1), 65-77.
Hakvoort, I., & Oppenheimer, L. (1998). Understanding peace and war: A review of developmental psychology research. Developmental Review, 18(3), 353–389.
Hall, R. (1993). How children think and feel about war and peace: An Australian study. Journal of Peace Research, 30(2), 181-196.
Henrich, E. (2014). Children’s toys and memories of migration in Australian museums. Childhood in the Past, 7(2), 133-146.
Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lombardo, L.X., & Polonko, K. A. (2015). Peace education and childhood. Journal of Peace Education, 12(2), 182-203.
Lourenço, O. (1999). Toward a positive conception of peace. In A. Raviv, L. Oppenheimer, & D. Bar-Tal (Eds.), How children understand war and peace: A call for international peace education (pp. 91-108). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McLernon, F., & Cairns, E. (2006). Children’s attitudes to war and peace: When a peace agreement means war. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30 (3), 272- 279.
Perry, C., & Cooper, M. (2001). Metaphors are good mirrors: Reflecting on change for teacher educators. Reflective Practice, 2(1), 41-52.
Rosell, L. (1968). Children’s views of war and peace. Journal of Peace Research, 5(3), 268- 276.
Tephly, J. (1985). Young children’s understanding of war and peace. Early Child Development and Care, 20(4), 271-285.
UNESCO (1995). Declaration and integrated framework of action on education for peace, human rights and democracy. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/ REV_74_E.PDF
Vestal, A., & Jones, N.A. (2004). Peace building and conflict resolution in preschool children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19 (2), 131-142.
Wright, P.H. (1978). Toward a theory of friendship based on a conception of self. Human Communication Research, 4 (3), 196-207.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


