TIME SERIES IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: APPLICATION IN THE STUDY OF COGNITIVE ACHIEVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2733Keywords:
time series, cognitive process, achievement measures, quantitative methodsAbstract
The study proposes the utility of time series methodology in the study of processes in educational psychology. Conjointly, the study applies time series in the study of cognitive achievement. Thirteen students from seventh to ninth grades performed an inductive reasoning test. The performance was measured in 20 different occasions and the observations were aggregated to generate a times series of 260 observations (20 different occasions by each individual multiplied by 13 participants). Result shows that a seasonal ARIMA (0,0,1) (1,1,1) adequately fits the data through a model comparative approach. Concluding, despites the complexity, ARIMA methodology is capable to investigate process, reducing the object of the study without lost its fundamental properties and dynamical aspects.
Article visualizations:
References
Borckardt, J. J., Nash, M. R., Murphy, M. D., Moore, M., Shaw, D., & O’Neil, P. (2008). Clinical practice as natural laboratory for psychotherapy research: a guide to case-based time-series analysis. American Psychologist, 63 (2), 77-95. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.77
Coghlan, A. (2011). A little book of R for time series. Retrieved from https://github.com/avrilcoghlan/LittleBookofRTimeSeries/raw/master/_build/latex/TimeSeries.pdf.
Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1975). Design and analysis of time series experiments. Boulder, CO: Colorado Associate University Press.
Golino, H. F. & Gomes, C. M. A. (2012). The structural validity of the Inductive Reasoning Developmental Test for the Measurement of Developmental Stages. In Adult Development: Past, Present and New Agendas of Research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the European Society for Research on Adult Development, Coimbra, PT. Retrieved from http://www.europeadultdevelopment.org/materials1.html.
Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2014). Psychology data from the “BAFACALO project: The Brazilian Intelligence Battery based on two state-of-the-art models – Carroll’s Model and the CHC model”. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2(1), p.e6. doi: 10.5334/jopd.af
Golino, H. F., Gomes C. M. A., Commons, M. L., & Miller, P. M. (2014). The construction and validation of a developmental test for stage identification: Two exploratory studies. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19 (3), 37-54.
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010a). Avaliando a avaliação escolar: notas escolares e inteligência fluida. Psicologia em Estudo, 15(4), 841-849. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287123084020
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010b). Estrutura fatorial da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BaFaCalo). Avaliação Psicológica, 9(3), 449-459. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712010000300011&lng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010c). Perfis de Estudantes e a relação entre abordagens de aprendizagem e rendimento Escolar. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 41(4), 503-509. Recuperado de http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/6336
Gomes, C. M. A. (2011a). Abordagem profunda e abordagem superficial à aprendizagem: diferentes perspectivas do rendimento escolar. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(3), 438-447. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722011000300004
Gomes, C. M. A. (2011b). Validade do conjunto de testes da habilidade de memória de curto-prazo (CTMC). Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 16(3), 235-242. doi:10.1590/S1413-294X2011000300005
Gomes, C. M. A. (2012). Validade de construto do conjunto de testes de inteligência cristalizada (CTIC) da bateria de fatores cognitivos de alta-ordem (BaFaCAlO). Gerais : Revista Interinstitucional de Psicologia, 5(2), 294-316. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-82202012000200009&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A. (2013). A Construção de uma Medida em Abordagens de Aprendizagem. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 44(2), 193-203. Recuperado de http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/11371
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2007). Validação do modelo de inteligência de Carroll em uma amostra brasileira. Avaliação Psicológica, 6(2), 167-179. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712007000200007&lng=en&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2008). Qualidades psicométricas de um conjunto de 45 testes cognitivos. Fractal: Revista de Psicologia, 20(1), 195-207. doi:10.1590/S1984-02922008000100019
Gomes, C. M. A. & Borges, O. N. (2009a). O ENEM é uma avaliação educacional construtivista? Um estudo de validade de construto. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, 20(42), 73-88. doi: 10.18222/eae204220092060
Gomes, C. M. A.s, & Borges, O. N. (2009b). Propriedades psicométricas do conjunto de testes da habilidade visuo espacial. PsicoUSF, 14(1), 19-34. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712009000100004&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2009c). Qualidades psicométricas do conjunto de testes de inteligência fluida. Avaliação Psicológica, 8(1), 17-32. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712009000100003&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2008). Limite da validade de um instrumento de avaliação docente. Avaliação Psicológica, 7(3), 391-401. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712008000300011&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., Pinheiro, C. A. R., Miranda, G. R., & Soares, J. M. T. (2011). Validação da Escala de Abordagens de Aprendizagem (EABAP) em uma amostra Brasileira. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(1), 19-27. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722011000100004
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012a). Incremental validity of the Learning Approaches Scale. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(4), 623-633. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722012000400001
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012b). O que a inteligência prediz: diferenças individuais ou diferenças no desenvolvimento acadêmico? Psicologia: teoria e prática, 14(1), 126-139. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-36872012000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2014). Self-reports on students' learning processes are academic metacognitive knowledge. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(3), 472-480. doi: 10.1590/1678-7153.201427307
Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Menezes, I. G. (2014). Predicting School Achievement Rather than Intelligence: Does Metacognition Matter? Psychology, 5, 1095-1110. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.59122
Gomes, C. M. A., de Araújo, J., Ferreira, M. G., & Golino, H. F. (2014). The validity of the Cattel-Horn-Carroll model on the intraindividual approach. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(4), 22-30. doi: 10.1037/h0101078
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. (2015). A retenção fatorial na abordagem intraindividual: proposição de uma estratégia de triangulação. Avaliação Psicológica, 14(2), 273-279. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712015000200013&lng=en&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., Araujo, J., Nascimento, E., & Jelihovisch, E. (2018). Routine Psychological Testing of the Individual Is Not Valid. Psychological Reports, 122(4), 1576-1593. doi: 10.1177/0033294118785636
Montgomery, D. C., Jennings, C. L., Kulahci, M. (2015). Introduction to time series analysis and forecasting (2nd. ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Muniz, M., Gomes, C. M. A., & Pasian, S. R. (2016). Factor structure of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices. Psico-USF, 21(2), 259-272. doi: 10.1590/1413-82712016210204
Pires, A. A. M., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2018). Proposing a method to create metacognitive school exams. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(8), 119-142. doi:10.5281/zenodo.2313538
Pires, A. A. M., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2017). Three mistaken procedures in the elaboration of school exams: explicitness and discussion. PONTE International Scientific Researches Journal, 73(3), 1-14. doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.3.1
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Van Geert, P. & Steenbeek, H. (2005a). The dynamics of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 115-128. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.05.003
Van Geert, P. & Steenbeek, H. (2005b). Explaining after by before. Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25 (34), 408-442. doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2008). A complexity and dynamic systems approach to developmental assessment, modeling and research. In A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer & P. Léna (Eds.). The educated brain: essays in neuro-education (pp. 71-94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Van Geert, P. L. C., & Fischer, K. W. (2009). Toward a New Grand Theory of Development? Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Reconsidered. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M. S. C. & McClelland, J. (Eds.). Dynamic systems and the quest for individual-based models of change and development (pp. 313-336). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (2003). Time Series Analysis. Em J. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 581-606). Volume 2, Handbook of Psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
