STUDENT LEARNING INTERACTION IN CONSTRUCTING THE UNDERSTANDING OF CONCEPT IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2737Keywords:
interaction, understanding, constructivistAbstract
Students can obtain an understanding of concepts through learning interactions in class. However, the interaction that occurs in the majority of classes is done between teachers and students who have a high ability. This causes students who have moderate and low ability to be reluctant to interact so the understanding of the material being studied is low. Learning that can facilitate interaction is cooperative learning. Cooperative learning is carried out in heterogeneous groups so as to enable cooperation and interaction between students who have high, medium or low ability. For such reason, this research aims to find out the characteristics of student learning interactions in constructing an understanding of concepts in cooperative learning. The method used in this study there has three stages. The first stage is field observation, determining the place of research. The second stage is determining the research subject, arranging the instrument, testing the instrument, validating the instrument. The third stage is data collection, data validity testing, data analysis, and conclusion drawing. The instruments used were camcorders, observation sheets, comprehension tests, and interview guidelines. The results showed that the characteristics of student learning interactions in constructing dominant concept understanding are the types of interaction asking and answering questions.
Article visualizations:
References
Afifah, D. S. N. (2012). Interaksi belajar matematika siswa dalam pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD. Jurnal Pedagogia, 1(2), 145–151.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (2011). Classroom as Learning Environments for Teaching and Research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph(4), 125–146.
Dewi, C. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think-pair share untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep masalah social IPS pada siswa sekolah dasar. Premiere Educandum, 5(2), 154 – 166.
Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2016). Abstraction in context: The case of peer interaction. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1(3), 307–368.
Febriyanti, C. (2014). Peran minat dan interaksi siswa dengan guru dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 4(3), 245–254.
Gillies, R. (2017). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(6), 271–287.
Gillies, R. M. (2015). Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 79(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009
Hudojo, H. (2008). Mengajar Belajar Matematika. Jakarta: Departemen pendidikan.
Ibrahim, R. (2010). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: University Press.
Jung, I. C. (2002). Student representation and understanding of geometric transformation with technology experience. The university of Georgia. Retrieved from http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/pers/jung_inchul_200205_phd.pdf
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (2017). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 287–315.
Leikin, R., & Zaslavsky, O. (2015). Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 331–354.
Marpaung, Y. (2009). Mengejar Ketertinggalan Kita Dalam Pendidikan Matematika. Surabaya.
Martin, D. P., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade mathematics? Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 359–373.
Masson, J. (2014). Fundamental Constructs in mathematics Education. London: The Open University.
Murdock, V. (2015). Making Sense of students’ understanding of Fraction: An Exploratory Study of Sixth Graders’ Construction of Fraction Concepts Through The Use of Physical Referents and Real Word Representations. The Florida State University College of Education.
Nugent, T. T. (2009). The impact of Teacher-Student interaction on student motivation and achievement. University of Central Florida.
Nur, W. (2008). Pendekatan-Pendekatan Konstruktivis Dalam Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Institut Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan.
Piaget, J. (2008). Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Roestiyah, N. K. (2014). Masalah Pengajaran Sebagai Suatu Sistem. Bandung: Rinerka Cipta.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: a best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 839–911. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330968
Stinson, S. L. (2009). College Students’ Understanding Of Rational Exponent A Teaching Experiment. In Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education. Atlanta: Georgia State University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
