EXPLORATION OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ ENGINEERING DESIGN PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i10.4486Keywords:
engineering design, STEM education, pre-service science teachers, science educationAbstract
In recent years, integration of engineering design with science teaching has often been preferred more since STEM Education (based on the integration of the science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines) has been an integral part of science education in many countries all over the world. Integrating engineering design with science teaching can be complex for science teachers because it has been relatively new and teachers have not been trained enough about it yet. Within this context, it is crucial to raise pre-service science teachers (PSTs) capable of integrating the engineering design process with science teaching effectively because they are implementers of future science teaching. In this manner, the purpose of this study is to explore pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs) engineering design performance development through STEM Education. A case study design was used in the current research. The research group was 20 PSTs who enrolled in ‘STEM Education’ course at a public university in Istanbul, Turkey. The data were collected with open-ended forms including 9 steps of the engineering design process. In the data analysis process, open-ended forms including PSTs’ responses about what they did in every step of engineering design for each STEM practices were analyzed with ‘Engineer’s Notebook Rubric’. Results showed that PSTs’ engineering design performance improved considerably week by week during ‘STEM Education’ course.
Article visualizations:
References
Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454–465.
Benenson, G. (2001). The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 730–745
Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High school student perceptions of the utility of the engineering design process: Creating opportunities to engage in engineering practices and apply math and science content. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 705–720.
Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers' enactment of high-leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102(2), 342–376.
Capobianco, B. M. & Radloff, J. (2022). Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Trajectories for Appropriating Engineering Design–Based Science Teaching. Research in Science Education, 52, 1623–1641 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y.
Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791–820.
Cunningham, C. M. & Carlsen, W. S. (2014) Teaching Engineering Practices, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25:2, 197-210, DOI: 10.1007/s10972-014-9380-5.
Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D., & Carberry, A. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. Available online at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537364.pdf
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., and Michael Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/12635/chapter/2#2
Kaya, E., Newley, A., Yesilyurt, E., & Deniz, H. (2019). Improving Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Engineering Teaching Efficacy Beliefs With 3D Design and Printing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(5), 76–83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26901320.
Kelley, T. (2013). Creating Engineer’s notebook grading rubric. Paper presented at International Technology and Engineering Education Association Conference, Columbus, OH.
Kim E, Oliver J. S. & Kim Y. A. (2019). Engineering design and the development of knowledge for teaching among preservice science teachers. School Science and Mathematics., 119:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12313
Morrison, J. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The student, the school, the classroom. Baltimore, MD: The Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM.
National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K‐12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K–12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 259–286.
Wendell, K. B., Swenson, J. E. S. & Dalvi T. S. (2019). Epistemological framing and novice elementary teachers' approaches to learning and teaching engineering design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21541
Wendell, K. B., Andrews, C. J., & Paugh, P. (2019). Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design. Science Education. 103(4), 952-978.
Williams, D., McCulloch, C., McMahon, T. & Goodyear, L. (2016). Engineering for Every K–12 Student. A Landscape Analysis of K–12 Engineering Education in the Greater Boston Region. Retrieved from https://ceeo.tufts.edu/documents/researchMEIDCreport.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods, Fifth edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
