DEVELOPMENT OF THE EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICING MODEL IN SCHOOL OF TRAINEE EDUCATIONAL STUDENTS IN TEACHING INTERNSHIP PROFESSIONAL TEACHER COURSES

Authors

  • Atchariya Promtow Research and Evaluation Program, Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand, 44000
  • Arun Suikraduang Research and Evaluation Program, Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand, 44000
  • Piyatida Panya Research and Evaluation Program, Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand, 44000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.481

Keywords:

evaluation, instructional practicing model, trainee student, teaching internships

Abstract

The aims of this research study were to analyze and develop the current state of synthesizer requirements and guidelines for the Evaluation Instructional Practicing Model (EIPM) in school of trainee educational students in teaching Internships professional teacher course with the research technique of the Ethnographic Delphi Futures Research (EDFR) on research limitation study into two phases, consequently with the sample size of 10 educational experts to analyze the current problems, needs analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the teaching internships and 18 professionals to determine the suitability of propriety and feasibility standards of the assessment form until a consensus with the EDFR were assembled of 7-educational trainee students by the 56-item of the 3-Delphi Technique Questionnaire (DTQ) and an Assessing Guide Copy (AGC). Statistically significant was analyzed with foundational statistic. It has found that the problems with the EIPM performance in the four disciplines of performance criteria to determine lack of gluten indicators and evaluation criteria, the quality of trainee student assessments, resulting from supervisor was not evaluated to actual conditions. Requirements and guidelines of the EIPM included four competencies: to manage learning in specific disciplines, to evaluate, improve and develop curriculum to suit the potential learners, can do in the classroom to develop trainee students, and to prepare a report on learning management and trainee student development. EIPM model consisted of five components: curriculum in specific disciplines contain three main indicator 14 sub-indicators, trainee students' potential indicator consists of two main sub-six indicators, and to develop the trainee students in the class consists of two main indicator nine sub-indicators. The four components reporting results, learning and trainee student development comprises two main indicators five sub-indicators. Five elements and attributions include two teachers, the main indicator 11 sub-indicators. The DTQ questionnaires fifth edition of evaluators comprised of school administrators, teachers, mentors and teacher supervision, trainee students assess themselves. Trainee students were responded on propriety standard at a high level ( = 4.46, S.D. = 0.18) and feasibility standard at a high level ( = 4.32, S.D. = 0.25). 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Chamnankit, I. (2011). The skills needed to learn and work in the 21st century. Retrieved on 8 April 2558 from http://gotoknoe.org/blog/training/368230.

Chumjit, Y. (2003). As a teacher. Bureau of prints Odeon Store, Bangkok.

Chumjit, Y. (2010). As a teacher. The Bangkok Edition: Odeon Store. Bangkok.

Kanjanakul, S. (2011). Qualifications framework for the faculty of education and higher education. Bangkok, Thailand.

Nevo, D (1983). The conceptualization of education evaluation. An Analytical Review of Educational Research. 53(6), pp. 117-128.

Pahe, S. (2013). Professional teacher performance: Developed into a modern society in the 21st century. Ed journal Science. Uttaradit Rajabhat University.

Stufflebeam, D. L., and et al. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision and making. Illinois: Peacock Publisher.

Stufflebeam, D. L., and Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory Model and Application. Retrieved on 21 August 2009 from www.amazon.com/ Evaluation- Theory

The Education Consultant. (2013). Regulations governing teachers' professional standards act A.D. 2013: Secretariat of the teacher council. Retrieved on 24 October 2013 from http://www.educ.su.ac.th/images/curriculum.B2_56.pdf.

The Gazette. (2013). Regulations governing teachers' professional standards act A.D. 2013: Morality and ethics. Retrieved on 4 March 2014 from http://www.educ.su.ac.th/images/curriculum56.pdf

The Ministry of Education. (2009). Qualifications Framework for Higher Education A.D. 2009. Undergraduate qualification standards in Bachelor of Education (5 years). Retrieved on 21 August 2009 from http://www.mua.go.th/users/tqf-hed/

Downloads

Published

2017-01-23

Issue

Vol 3, No 1 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).