IMPRESSIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES WITH INDOCTRINATING RESEARCH-BASED TO CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS FOR EDUCATIONAL STUDENTS

Authors

  • Khwanchai Khuana Department of Curriculum and Instruction Faculty of Education, Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University, 69 Villege No. 1, Nakornchum Subdistrict, Muang District, Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand: 62000
  • Tanthip Khuana Department of Curriculum and Instruction Faculty of Education, Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University, 69 Villege No. 1, Nakornchum Subdistrict, Muang District, Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand: 62000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.490

Keywords:

designing instructional model, educational students, indoctrination, research-based, leaning strategies, creative thinking skills

Abstract

To design the instructional model through impressive educational students of their indoctrinating Research-Based Learning Strategies (RBLS) to their creative thinking skills in Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University, and to monitor and evaluate students’ learning outcomes of the determinants and effects of the RBLS which learning strategies enhancing educational students organize of their indoctrinating creative thinking skills. Administration consisted of 38 junior educational students in faculty of education with the purposive random sampling technique with composed of the Questionnaire on Strategized Context (QSC), the Developing Instructional Model (DIM), the Critical Thinking Test (CTT), and the Questionnaire on Student Satisfaction (QSS). Statistically significant was analyzed, and junior educational students were responded of their QSC and CTT which indicated that the scale means showed off 2.56 on the instructional content for enhancing educational students’ creative thinking skills, and standard deviation for the QSC on the developing instructional model indicated of 0.71. The finding also further supported students’ need has indicated that their performances were enhanced to their creative thinking abilities evident of high level. Junior educational students were impressed of their indoctrinating RBLS to their creative thinking skills that it has revealed their mean scores of the QSS were high level, suitability. Students’ learning achievements with the DIM, the average mean scores were found evidence of 26.21, it means as 81% of the variance in students’ creative thinking skills to their instructional management with the RBLS class was attributable to their indoctrination of their CTT and showed the statistically significant between students’ outcomes of their post and pre- test at the level of 0.01, differently. The instructional efficiency value of the RBLS was assessed with the E1/E2 and indicated of 80.73/80.98, and the average mean score and standard deviation of students’ responses to their QSS revealed of high level as 4.26, and 0.46, consequently.    

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Braxton, S., Bronico, K., & Looms, T. (1995). Instructional design methodologies and techniques. (Dead web page cited by Qureshi).

Collins English Dictionary. (2012). Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition© William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins

Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.dictionary.com/browse/impressive

Driscoll, M., Carliner, S. (2005) Advanced Web-Based Training: Adapting Real World Strategies in Your Online Learning, Pfeiffer. ISBN 0787969796

EDU Resource. (2014). What is creative thinking, creative thinking definition. Retrieved from http://www.edu-resource.com/training-and-development/what-is-creative-thinking.php

Enkenberg, J. (2001). Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior 17; pp. 495-506.

Funk, A. & Wagnalls, B. (1972): To instruct in doctrines; esp., to teach partisan or sectarian dogmas; I.A. Snook, ed. 1972. Concepts of Indoctrination (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

LessonCast, Next Generation Teacher Preparation. (2011). What is Research-Based and Who decides? Retrieved from http://www.lessoncast.com/2011/09/what-is-research-based-and-who-decides/

Linde, S. (2012). Research based learning strategies. Educational Psychology. Retrieved from http://study.com/academy/lesson/research-based-learning-strategies.html

Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.

Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Malbar, Florida: Krieger publishing company. 1998.

Simons, P. R. J., Van de Linden, J. L.., and Duffy, T. (2000). New learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. 2000.

Vermunt, J. D. and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, pp. 257-280.

Wilson, J., (1964). Education and indoctrination, in T.H.B. Hollins, ed. Aims in Education: the Philosophic Approach. Manchester University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-25

Issue

Vol 3, No 2 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).