CURRENT SITUATION AND SOLUTIONS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TEACHING IN STEM EDUCATION IN GENERAL SCHOOLS: A CASE STUDY IN SOME NORTHERN PROVINCES OF VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i1.5172Keywords:
current situation, solutions, STEM education, Vietnam, teacher trainingAbstract
The paper delves into the state and challenges of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education in schools. By conducting an intensive survey, it offers insights into the current status of STEM education and highlights the perceptions and difficulties faced by educators in adopting STEM methodologies. The study reveals that while there's an increasing recognition of the importance of STEM in the natural sciences curriculum, several obstacles impede its full implementation. A significant challenge is the difficulty in correlating real-world issues with natural science subjects, making it tough for educators to make lessons engaging and relevant. Furthermore, the lack of appropriate educational tools and materials, combined with inadequate infrastructural facilities in schools, further hampers the quality of teaching. Moreover, the research identifies a gap in the training of educators. Many teachers are unfamiliar with STEM, lacking both understanding and confidence in the approach. This is exacerbated by time constraints in the classroom and insufficient support from parents. Additionally, the paper points out that only a limited number of natural science topics can be aptly integrated into STEM projects, creating a narrower scope for educators. To address these challenges, the paper suggests the need for better training for teachers specifically tailored to STEM requirements, more substantial institutional support, and fostering a closer relationship between STEM education and the broader natural sciences curriculum.
Article visualizations:
References
English, L. D., & King, D. (2018). STEM Integration in Sixth Grade: Designing and Constructing Paper Bridges. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 863-884.
Freeman, B., Marginson, S., & Tytler, R. (2015). The economic imperative for STEM education. Global Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 17-25.
Goktepe Yildiz, S., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2018). The Effects of Engineering Design Processes on Spatial Abilities of Middle School Students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-22.
Jolly, A. (2017). STEM in global context: America's competitive edge. Journal of STEM Education, 18(2), 34-40.
Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (2000). Trends in STEM education: A global perspective. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(2), 25-31.
Kim, Y., Choi, S., & Baek, Y. (2018). STEM in East Asia: Challenges and opportunities. East Asian STEM Journal, 1(1), 45-55.
Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. U.S. Economics & Statistics Administration Issue Brief, 3-11.
Le, H. H. (Chief Editor), Vũ, N. T. H. (Editor), & various authors. (2020). STEM education guide for Grade 6 (For school managers and secondary school teachers). Ministry of Education and Training, Secondary Education Development Program Phase 2, Hanoi.
Marx, S. (2017). Culturally responsive pedagogies in STEM. Educational Theory and Practice, 7(4), 48-56.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). General education curriculum for Natural Science (Issued with Circular No. 32, December 28, 2018). Ministry of Education and Training.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2020). Official Letter No. 3089/BGDĐT-GDTrH dated August 14, 2020, on the implementation of STEM education in secondary education.
Nguyen, P. (2017). STEM education in Singapore: A holistic approach. Asian Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 20-29.
Ngo, V. H., & Do, T. T. N. (2022). STEM literature in Vietnam: A critical analysis. Vietnamese Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 1-10.
Ngo, V. H., & Pham, V. H. (2019). Guidelines for constructing school curriculum implementing the 2018 general education program. Hanoi Capital University Science Journal, 36(12), 132-138.
Office of the Chief Scientist. (2016). Australia's strategy for STEM excellence. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Siti, H. A. Z. & Zanaton H. I. (2019). Sketching Engineering Design in STEM Classroom: A Systematic Review. Creative Education, 10, 2775-2783.
Victoria, V. (2019). Invigorating STEM: The Australian initiative. Melbourne: Victoria Government Printing Office.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


