THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GIFTED AND UNGIFTED STUDENTS’ SELF-PERCEPTIONS AND THEIR PARENTS’ PARENTING STYLES: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.533Keywords:
intelligence, gifted, child rearing methods, self-perception, structural equationAbstract
The aim of this study is to reveal the influence of parental child rearing methods on self-perceptions of gifted and ungifted students with structural equation modeling. To achieve this purpose, the study has been carried out in BİLSEM in Mersin city and in multiple elementary state schools. As a descriptive method, causal-comparative method has been used in this study. Accordingly, Demographic Information Questionnaire, Offer Self-image Questionnaire, Parenting Style Inventory have been applied to students. In statistical analysis, Mann Whitney U Test, The Kruskal Wallis H Tests, Chi-Square Test and Path Analysis Techniques have been used. As a result of the study, it is found out that self-perceptions of gifted students are higher than self-perceptions of ungifted students. In SEM (Structural Equation Modeling), parental child rearing methods related to gifted and ungifted students explain the students’ self-perceptions at a statistically significant level.
Article visualizations:
References
Altun, F. ve Yazıcı, H. (2012). Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Benlik Kavramları ve Akademik Öz-Yeterlik İnançları: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışma. [Gifted Students’ Self-Concepts and Their Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs: A Comparative Study] Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, s. 319 – 334.
Aunola, K., Stattin, H. ve Nunni, J. (2000). Parenting Style and Adolescents' Achievement Strategies. Journal of Adolescence, 23, p. 205-222.
Balcı, A. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma, [Research in Social Sciences] Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Bartel, N. P. ve Reynolds, W. M. (1986). Depression and Self-Esteem in Academically Gifted and Nongifted Children: A Comparison Study. Journal of School Psychology, 24, p. 55-61.
Burak, E. M. (1995). Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Benlik Kavramlarına İlişkin Bir Araştırma. [A Study on Gifted Students’ Self-Concepts]Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, A.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R.B., Turner, L.A. (2015). Araştırma Yöntemleri Desen ve Analiz. [Research Method Designs and Analysis](Çev.Ed. A. Aypay) Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1982). Self-concept and the gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol 26(3), p. 116-120.
Cornell, D. G. (1983). Gifted Children. The Impact of Positive Labelling on the Family System. American Journal of Ortopsychiatry, 53, p. 322-335.
Cüceloğlu D. (2000). İnsan ve Davranışı,[Human and His Behavior] İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Çelik, H.E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Lisrel 9.1 ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi
Temel Kavramlar, Uygulamalar, Programlama. [Basic Concepts, Practices and Programming in Structural Equation Modelling with Lisrel 9.1] Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Demoulin, D.F. (1999). A Personalized Development of Self-Concept for Beginning Readers. Education, 120(1).
Garcia, F. ve Gracia E. (2009). Is Always Authoritative the Optimum Parenting Style? Evidence from Spanish Families. Adolescence, 44(173), p. 101-131
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations. Journal of Avolied Psychology. 2(71), p. 340-342.
Heppner PP, Wampold BE, Kivlighan DM. (2013). Jr. Research design in counseling. 3rd ed. Brooks/Cole; Belmont, CA.
Herz, L. ve Gullone, E. (1999). The Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Parenting Style: A Cross-cultural Comparison of Australian and Vietnamese Australian Adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(6), p. 742-761.
Hoge, R.D. and Renzulli, J.S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research. 63: 449-465.
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2012). Benlik, Aile ve İnsan Gelişimi. [Self-concept, Family and Human Development] (3. Basım). İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Karnes. F.A. ve Wherry, J.N. (1981). Self-concepts of gifted students as measured by the Piers- Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale, Psychological Reports, 49(3), p. 9-14.
Kuzgun, Y. (2000). Meslek Danışmanlığı, [Vocational Counselling] Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Loeb, R. C. & Jay, G. (1987). Self Concept in the Gifted Children: Differential Impact in Boys and Girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, p. 4–9.
Maccoby, E. E. ve Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the Context of the Family: Parent-Child Interaction, P.H.Mussen, ve E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Cil IV Socialization, Personality and Social Development, New York, Wiley, p. 1-101.
Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the Gifted and Talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Milevsky, A., Schlechter, M., Netter, S. ve Keehn, D. (2007). Maternal and Paternal Parenting Style in Adolescents: Associations with Self Esteem, Depression, and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, p. 39-47.
Özgüven, İ.E. (2011). Psikolojik Testler. [Psychological Tests] Ankara: Pdrem Yayınları.
Pyryt, M.C. ve Mendaglio, S. (1994). The multidimensional Self-concept: A Comparison of Gifted and Average-Ability Adolescents, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(3), p. 299-305.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Exceptionality, 10(2), 113-125.
Savaşır I. Ve Şahin, N.H. (1997). Bilişsel-davranışçı terapilerde değerlendirme: Sık kullanılan ölçekler. [ Evaluation in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies: Frequently Used Scales ]Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar.[Structural Equation Models: Basic Concepts and Sample Practices] Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3 (6), 49-74.
Sümer, N. ve Güngör D. (1999). Çocuk Yetiştirme Stillerinin Bağlanma Stilleri, Benlik Değerlendirmeleri ve Yakın İlişkiler Üzerindeki Etkisi.[The Effect of Parenting Styles on Attachment Styles, Self Evaluations and Intimate Relationships ] Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(44), s. 35-58.
Şahin, N. (1993). Offer Benlik İmgesi Ölçeği El Kitabı. [Offer Self- Image Scale Handbook]
Uyanık, (2007). Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklarda Mükemmeliyetçilik, Yalnızlık ve Kendine Saygı Düzeyinin Sınav Kaygısı Üzerindeki Etkileri, [The Effect of Gifted Students’ Level of Perfectionism, Loneliness and Self-Esteem on Exam Anxiety] Yayımlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Weiten, W. ve Lloyd, M.A. (2006). Psychology Applied to Modern Life: Adjustment in the 21st Century, USA: Belmont CA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
