APPLICABILITY OF BALANCED SCORECARD SYSTEM IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS ACCORDING TO OPINIONS OF EDUCATION INSPECTORS, MANAGERS AND TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.561Keywords:
primary school, balanced scorecard, performance evaluationAbstract
This study was carried out in order to specifying the opinions of the staffs working as manager, teacher and educational inspectors at primary schools about the implementation of balanced scorecard in education institutions. To perform that aim the staffs serving as manager, teacher and inspector at the primary Schools nearby center of Elazığ Province was determined as the population. In the research, the descriptive survey model was used. The sampling subjects consisted of 110 managers, 340 teachers, 20 inspectors, which was specified by the Random Sampling Method. For the purpose of reflecting the viewpoint of participants, a balanced score card was prepared. In order to determine the reliability and validity of the scale analysis was been done and ıt was found to be reliability coefficient was Cronbach Alfa=0.963,standartize reference value was =,965. The data shows that scale was very reliable and valid that feature was. The researcher personally kept track of this scale and collected by going to the schools. At the end of this research, it was realized that the participants generally approve the implementation of the balanced score card. That the participants attend the matters in the balanced scorecard scale and that the matters are implemented will be effective in terms of specifying the school performance and development.
Article visualizations:
References
Akal, Z. (1996). “İşletmelerde Performans Ölçüm Ve Denetimi: Çok Yönlü Performans Göstergeleri,” İşletmelerde Performans Ölçüm ve Denetimi Milli Prodüktivite MerkeziYayınları, No: 473, Ankara.
Akgül, B. (2004). “İşletmelerde yeni performans ölçümleme sistemleri,” Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (24):73-82.
Aksit, F. (2006). “Performans Değerlendirme İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri (Bigadiç İlköğretim Öğretmenleri Örneği),” Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2, 76-101.
Akdağ, M. (2010). “Eğitimde Program Değerlendirme Ve İstatistiksel Yöntemler”. Dowlanded at:”06.07.2010 http://web.inonu.edu.tr
Ahn, H. (2001). Applying The Balancing Scorecard Concept: An Experience Report,” Long Range Planning, 34(4), 441-461
Erkul, H., Dereköy, F. and Ayhün, S.E. (2015). “Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Dengeli Ölçüm Kartı Geliştirilmesi: Çanakkale Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Örneği, “Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 5(3), 203-213
Bayram, L. (2005). “Geleneksel Performans Değerlendirme Yöntemlerine Yeni Bir Alternatif: 360 Derece Performans Değerlendirme,” Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı: 62.
Barutçugil, İ. (2002). “Performans Yönetimi,” KariyerYayıncılık, İstanbul.
Bean, L. and Jarnagin, B. (2003). “New Cost Priorities: Using a Balanced Scorecard Approach in Financial Reports”, Journal Of İnteractive Marketing, 17(2)/ Spring.
Cemaloğlu, N. (2010). “Eğitimde Performans Değerlendirme,” Dowlanded at:06.07.2010 http://simaybirce.net/bilgibankasi/YararliKaynaklar/makale_tez/egitimde_performans_degerlendirme.doc
Çoşkun, A. (2006). Bankaların Stratejik Performans Yönetiminde Performans Karnesi Kullanımı, BankacılarDergisi, Sayı 56
Coskun, A. (2005). “İsletmeler deperformans yönetimi: Bir yönetim muhasebesi aracı olarak performans karnesi”, Doctoral thesis, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul
Devrim, B. (2006). “Strateji Formülasyonu: Swot Analizi, KurumalKarne, Kalite FonksiyonYayılımı, Sun Tzu’nun İşletme Yönetimi Stratejilerinin Bütünleştirmesi Üzerine Bir Çalışma,” A master thesis, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir
Ensari, H. (2005). “21.yy. Okulları İçin Etkili Bir Stratejik Yönetim Aracı Balanced Scorecard,” SistemYayıncılık
Güner, D. (2009). “Stratejiden Aksiyona Giderken Bir Rehber Olarak Balanced Scorecard,” A master thesis, Sakarya Üniversitesi
Grayson, L. P. (2004). “An Example: A Management Strategy for a Private School Balanced Scorecard,” Balanced Scorecard Institute, Dowlanded At: 21.12.2015
Hocalar, E. (2007). “Yüksek Öğretim Kurumları İçin Bulanık Puanlamalı Dengelenmiş Performans Karneleme Sistemi Uygulaması.” A master thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya Üniversitesi
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996). “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System,” Harvard Business Review, January - February
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992). “The Balanced Scorecard Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, 70 (1), 71-79
Karasar, N. (1999). “Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri,” Nobel Yayınevi, Ankara
Karathanos, D. and Karathanos, P. (2005). “Appliying The Balanced Scorecard To Education,”"Southeast Missouri State University Cape Girardeau, Missouri
Kettunen, J. (2005). “Implementation of Strategies in Continuing Education, “International Journal of Educational Management. 19(3):207-217.
Krejcie, R. V., and Morgan, D. W. (1970). “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
O’Neil H., Benmison E. (1999). “Designing and Implementingan Academic Scorecard,” Change, 31(6)
Robinson, J.B. (2015). “A Study of Georgia School Districts’ Balanced Scorecard Alignment To The College And Career Ready Performance Index,” A doctoral thesis, The University of Georgia.
Smith, H. and Kim (2005). “Balanced Scorecard at Summa Health System,” Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 16(5), 65-72.
Storey, A. (2002). “Performance Management in Schools: could the Balanced Scorecard help?” School Leadership & Management, 22(3),21-338.
Yazır, T. (2007). “Eğitim Kumları İçin Kurumsal performans Ölçümüne Yönelik Bir Model Geliştirme Çalışması,” A master thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa
Yüksel, H. and Coşkun A. (2013). “Strategy Focused Schools: An Implementation of the Balanced Scorecard in Provision of Educational Services,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 217, Pages 1-1240
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
