INTERPERSONAL BEHAVIOURS OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS THROUGH THEIR ADMINISTRATIONS IN THE BASIC EDUCATION SCHOOLS IN THAILAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.598Keywords:
interpersonal behaviours, school administrators, basic education schools, teachers’ perceptions, Thailand, Office of Basic Education Commission (OBEC), leadershipAbstract
Comparatively speaking, the performance of Thai administrators in international studies of Thailand's relatively weak human resource base has been pinpointed as one of the underlying factors in the cause of the economic and financial crisis that has hit the country over recent years very poor. This research reports on a study that investigated the role that Thai administrators’ interpersonal relationships with their teachers play in enhancing the teachers’ teaching plan and students’ achievement in the subject and in forming or changing the teachers’ attitudes to teaching arrangement. The questionnaires were administered to a sample of 716 teachers in 80 schools under the Office of Basic Education Commission (OBEC) throughout of Thailand. Administrator-teacher interactions were assessed with the 48-item Questionnaire on Administrator Interaction (QAI) which was adapted version from the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) (Wubbles & Levy, 1993). This questionnaire has an Actual and Preferred Forms. Teachers’ attitudes were assessed with the Test of Administrator-Related Attitudes (TOARA) which was based on the Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA) (Fraser, 1981). Statistically significant differences were found between the teachers’ perceptions of actual and preferred administrator interpersonal behaviours. It was found that administrator interpersonal behaviour was high on factors such as Leadership, Helping/Friendly, Understanding and Teacher Responsibility/Freedom behaviour, while factors such as Uncertain, Dissatisfied, Admonishing, and Strict behaviours were far less prominent. Significant differences were found between teachers’ perceptions of actual and preferred administrator interpersonal behaviours, and a typology comparison of teachers’ perceptions of Thai administrators could be classified as Authoritative in both the actual and preferred administrators’ interpersonal behaviours. Associations between teachers’ perceptions of their administrators’ interpersonal behaviour with their attitudes to their school administration were found. The multiple correlations were significant for the Actual Form of the QAI and the TOARA, 39% of the variance in teacher’s attitude to their schools was attributable to their perceptions. Based on the findings, suggestions for determining and effecting the school administrations by school’s administrator interpersonal behaviour for improving sustainable educational development in school’s administration in Thailand with teachers’ perceptions are provided.
Article visualizations:
References
Creton, H., Hermans, H. A., & Wubbels, T. (1990). Improvement interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom: A systems communication perspective. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 18, 54-49.
Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B., & Rickards, T. (1996). Assessing teacher-teacher interpersonal relationships in science classes. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(3), 28-33.
Fisher, D. L., Henderson, D. & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Interpersonal behaviour in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education, 25, 125-133.
Fisher, D. L., Rickards, T. W., Goh, S.C., & Wong, A. F. L. (1997b). Perceptions of interpersonal teacher behaviour in secondary science classrooms in Singapore and Australia. Journal of Applied Research in Education, 1, 2-13.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA). Melbourne: Australian Council for Education Research.
Henderson, D., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Interpersonal behaviour, laboratory learning environments and teacher outcomes in senior biology classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 26-43.
Khine, M. S., & Fisher, D. L. (2001, December). Classroom environment and teachers' cultural background and secondary science classes in an Asian context. Paper presented at annual conference of Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth.
Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Classroom environment and administrator interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14, 3-12.
Koul, R., & Fisher, D. l. (2003, December). Science classroom environments in India. Paper presented at annual conference of Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane.
Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
McRobbie, C., Fraser, B. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1991). Comparison of personal and class forms of the science laboratory environment inventory. Research in Science Education, 21, 244-252.
Nair, C. S., & Fisher (2001). Learning environments and teacher attitudes to science at the senior secondary and tertiary levels. Issue In Education Research, vol. 11.
Quek, C.L., Fraser, B., & Wong, A.F. (2001, December), Determinants and effects of perceptions of chemistry classroom learning environments in secondary school gifted education classes in Singapore. Paper presented at annual conference of Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth, WA.
Rickards, T., & Fisher, D. L. (1996). Associations between teacher-teacher interpersonal behaviour, gender, cultural background and achievement. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum 1996.
Scott, R. H., & Fisher, D. L. (2001, December). The impact of teachers’ interpersonal on examination results in Brunei. Paper presented at annual conference of Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth.
Santiboon, T., & Fisher, D. (2004, September). Actual and preferred learning environments in physics classes in Thailand. Paper presented at the International Conference on Science and Technology of Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand.
Santiboon, T., & Fisher, D. (2005, August). Learning environments and teacher-student interactions in physics classes in Thailand. Sustainable communities and sustainable environments: Envisioning a role for science, mathematics and technology education: Proceeding of the 4th international conference on science, mathematics and technology education (pp. 511-520). British Columbia, Canada: Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia.
Soerjaningsih, W., & Nusantara, B. (2001, December). Learning environment teacher-teacher interpersonal behaviour and achievement among university teachers in Indonesia. Paper presented at annual conference of Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth.
Waldrip, B., & Fisher, D. L. (2001, December). Perceptions of teacher-teacher interactions in exemplary science teachers’ classroom. Paper presented at annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth.
Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1, 12-22.
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. (1991). Interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Wallerg (Eds.), Educational Environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 141-161). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. (1993a). Comparison of students’ and teachers’ perceptions of interpersonal teacher behaviour. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what do look like? International relationships in education (pp. 64-68). London: Falmer Press.
Wubbels, T., Creton, H., Levy, J., Hooymayers, H. (1993c). The model for interpersonal teacher behaviour. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what do look like? International relationships in education (pp. 13-28). London: Falmer Press.
Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1993). Do you know what do look like? International relationships in education (pp. 146-162). London: Falmer Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


