INNOVATION IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN GREECE: EDUCATORS’ MOTIVATIONS

Authors

  • Kyriaki Katsari Public School of Higher Vocational Training of Veria, Greece, Department of Primary Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Western Macedonia, Greece
  • John N. Bizos Second Chance School of Alexandria, Greece, Department of Primary Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Western Macedonia, Greece
  • Maria Gogou School of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Christos V. Gogos Dr., Public School of Higher Vocational Training of Veria, Greece, School of Spatial Planning and Development, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, General Hospital of Imathia, Greece orcid.org/0000-0002-8658-5980

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i7.6072

Keywords:

educational innovation, motivation, educators, vocational training, Greece

Abstract

This study investigates the motivations of educators at Greek Higher Vocational Training Schools for adopting innovative practices in education. It explores both internal and external factors influencing innovation. The findings reveal that internal motivations and the perceived needs of students and educational units are key drivers of innovation, whereas gender and age do not significantly correlate with motivation. Experienced educators show a greater inclination toward innovation, associating it with professional prestige and collaboration satisfaction. External mandates, such as government policies, often lack effectiveness unless adequately supported. The study emphasizes that educational innovation should stem from intrinsic motivation, collaborative environments, and student-cantered approaches, and highlights the crucial role of internal leadership. Future research should delve into specific innovative practices, such as experiential learning, to enhance empathy.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biographies

  • Kyriaki Katsari, Public School of Higher Vocational Training of Veria, Greece, Department of Primary Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Western Macedonia, Greece

    Kyriaki Katsari is an adult educator at the Public School of Higher Vocational Training of Veria, Greece. She holds an MSc in Education Sciences: Management and Administration in Education-Educational Leadership from the University of Western Macedonia, Greece. Her research interests focus on data analysis and innovative practices in adult education.

  • John N. Bizos, Second Chance School of Alexandria, Greece, Department of Primary Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Western Macedonia, Greece

    John Bizos is a mathematician who teaches at the Second Chance School of Alexandria, Central Macedonia, Greece. He is a postgraduate student in Education Sciences: Management and Administration in Education-Educational Leadership, University of Western Macedonia, Greece. His research interests include data analysis, adult education, and innovative methods in the teaching of mathematics and computing.

  • Maria Gogou, School of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

    Maria Gogou is an undergraduate at the School of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Her scientific interests focus on individual differences, disabilities, and the special education needs of children, as well as innovative educational practices.

  • Christos V. Gogos, Dr., Public School of Higher Vocational Training of Veria, Greece, School of Spatial Planning and Development, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, General Hospital of Imathia, Greece orcid.org/0000-0002-8658-5980

    Dr. Christos Gogos, PhD, of the School of Spatial Planning and Development, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, is an adult educator at the Public School of Higher Vocational Training of Veria, Greece. He also received an MSc in Health Services Administration from the National School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Greece. His scientific interests focus on adult education, health and education inequalities, and the implementation of innovative practices in education. He has published in Greek and English journals and conference proceedings.

    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8658-5980

References

Abd Majid, M.Z., & Mafarjaa, N. (2024). (2024). Understanding the Educational Innovation Practice in Teaching and Learning among Economic Teachers in Klang Valley. SHS Web of Conferences, 182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418201005

Abidi, O., Nimer, K., Bani‐Mustafa, A., & Toglaw, S. (2022). Relationship between faculty characteristics and their entrepreneurial orientation in higher education institutions in Kuwait. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(12). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00206-7

Akinyemi, A. F., Rembe, S., & Nkonki, V. (2020). Trust and positive working relationships among teachers in communities of practice as an avenue for professional development. Education Sciences, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050136

Al Issa, B. F. F., Mat, N. H. N., & Anuar, M. M. (2023). Unleashing Innovation: The Role of Internal Marketing in the Education Sector. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 7(4), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv7i4p7

Almalki, A., & Faqihi, Y. (2021). The Applicability of (STEAM) in Pre-university Education from the Perspective of Science and Mathematics Teachers at Najran. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090212

Atasoy, R., & Özden, C. (2022). The Effect of Instructional Leadership, Organizational Innovativeness, and School Hindering on Teachers’ Satisfaction at BILSEMs. Education Reform Journal, 7(2), 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7489405

Blömeke, S., Nilsen, T., & Scherer, R. (2021). School innovativeness is associated with enhanced teacher collaboration, innovative classroom practices, and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1645.

Čábelková, I., Dvořák, M., Smutka, L., Strielkowski, W., & Volchik, V. (2022). The predictive ability of emotional creativity in motivation for adaptive innovation among university professors under the COVID-19 epidemic: An international study. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(13), 997213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997213.

Chandolia, E., & Anastasiou, S. (2020). Leadership and conflict management style are associated with the effectiveness of school conflict management in the region of Epirus, NW Greece. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010034

Chychuk, A., Zorochkina, T., Yachmenyk, M., Kyrylenko, N., Kumeda, О., & Mougel, D. (2021). Innovative technologies for the implementation of educational activities in higher education institutions. Laplage Em Revista, 7(3A), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.24115/s2446-6220202173a1416p.370-377

Cui, C., & Yin, Y. (2023). How professional training impacts teaching innovation among ideological and political teachers: the mediating and moderating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(November), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1246951

Eisenschmidt, E., & Oder, T. (2018). Does Mentoring Matter? On the Way to Collaborative School Culture. Educational Process: International Journal, 7, 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2018.71.1

Emo, W. (2015). Teachers’ motivations for initiating innovations. Journal of Educational Change, 16(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9243-7

Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., ... & Williams, K. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools, second edition. In School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools, Second Edition (2nd ed.). Corwin Press, Inc.’ Thousand Oaks, California A Sage Publications Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494673

European Commission. (2025). Erasmus+ Programme Guide. The essential guide to understanding Erasmus+. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/programme-guide/part-d/glossary-vet

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://www.soc.univ.kiev.ua/sites/default/files/library/elopen/andy-field-discovering-statistics-using-spss-third-edition-20091.pdf

Fomin, K. (2024). Educational Dialogue: Several Aspects of Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Reflective and Proactive Readiness for Teaching Practice. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 11(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.1.59-71

Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017). Making sense while steering through the fog: Principals’ metaphors within a national reform implementation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(105). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2942

García-Martínez, I., Arrifano Tadeu, P.J., Pérez-Ferra, M., & Ubago-Jiménez, J. L. (2020). Building a Common Project by Promoting Pedagogical Coordination and Educational Leadership for School Improvement: A Structural Equation Model. Social Sciences, 9(52).

Gavrilyuk, O. A., Tareva, E. G., & Lakhno, A. V. (2019). Investigating the association between university teachers’ professional autonomy and their innovation performance. Pedagogika, 133(1), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2019.133.7

Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900401

Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., & Ortega-Sánchez, D. (2019). Digital Literacy of Teachers in Training: Moving from ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) to LKTs (Learning and Knowledge Technologies). Education Sciences., 9, 274. https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/educsci9040274

Gregorzewski, M. (2018). Where teachers learn through work and students work to learn: An empirically informed report on two examples of educational innovations from a German school. Studia Paedagogica, 23(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2018-2-8

Hadijah, N. (2024). Stakeholder engagement in policy development. Eurasian Experiment Journal of Arts and Management (EEJAM), 6(1), 17–20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567945/

Hammond, L. D., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development (Issue June). https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev.

Hazzi, O. A., & Maaldaon, I. S. (2015). A pilot study: Vital methodological issues. Business: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2015.437

Head, J., Lysenko, L., Wade, A., & Abrami, P. C. (2023). Scaling up a Technology-Based Literacy Innovation: Evolution of the Teacher Professional Development Course. International Journal of Technology in Education, 6(4), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.541

Henriksen, D. (2017). Creating STEAM with Design Thinking: Beyond STEM and Arts Integration. The STEAM Journal, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20170301.11

HiDubai Newswire. (2025). UAE’s Ministry of Education launches innovation strategy to promote development of creative ideas & capabilities. https://focus.hidubai.com/ministry-of-education-launches-innovation-strategy/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Kakungulu Samuel, J. (2024). The Role of Technology in Enhancing Educational Outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 19–23.

Kalman, M., & Bozbayindir, F. (2017). An Investigation of Dispositional Resistance, Change-specific Resistance and Change-Related Information: The Case of the “4+4+4” Educational Reform in Turkey. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 125–155. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2017.2622

Karava, F. (2018). Innovative Programmes and Innovative Teaching Methods in Primary Education: Degree of acceptance by teachers and barriers to their implementation. University of Thessaly, Pedagogical Department of Primary Education, in Greek.

Karipolglou, K. (2012). Employment policies in Greece. Democritus University of Thrace, Department of Law, in Greek.

Karolčík, Š., & Marková, M. (2023). How teachers perceive innovations in education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-04-2023-0039

Kearney, C., & Kelly, R. (2022). Innovative Teaching and Learning Practices: The Student Perspective. 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22), 1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.4995/head22.2022.14654

Kharisova, L. A. (2016). Analysis of the quality of innovative activity of the school by teaching staff. SHS Web of Conferences, 29, 01030. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162901030

Kinnunen, P., & Eriksson, T. (2018). Teachers’ viewpoint on online courses. CSEDU 2018 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, 412–417. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006786904120417

Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M., & Martens, R. (2017). Teachers’ Innovative Behaviour: The Importance of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, Intrinsic Motivation, and Occupational Self-Efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803

Kramer, J. W., Cuevas, S., & Boatman, A. (2021). Faculty attitudes toward technology-driven instruction in developmental mathematics. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(45). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5843

Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150.

Kyrimi, V. (2018). Professional Development and Training for Primary Education Teachers. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Philosophy, in Greek.

Law 5082. (2024). Government Gazette. Law No. 5082. Strengthening of the National System of Vocational Education and Training and other urgent provisions, A 9/19.1.2024.

Li, K. C., Wong, B. T. M., & Chan, H. T. (2023). Teaching and learning innovations for distance learning in the digital era: a literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8(August), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1198034

Lingyan Meng. (2024). The Changes and Challenges of Educational Technology Innovation on the Role of Teachers. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 8(5), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2024.080526

Little, P. (2012). School-Community Learning Partnerships: Essential to Expanded Learning Success. In Terry K. Peterson (Ed.), Expanding Minds and Opportunities: Leveraging the Power of Afterschool and Summer Learning for Student Success.

Lo, S., & Nasri, N. B. (2022). Science Teachers’ Level of Concern on Dual Language Programme (DLP) in Primary Schools in Sri Aman District. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i3/14368

Lokhvytska, L., & Martovytska, N. (2022). Innovations in professional activity: what students of the specialty “Preschool Education” think about it. SHS Web of Conferences, 142, 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214202002

Lysenko, L., Abrami, P. C., & Wade, C. A. (2022). Sustainability and Scalability of Digital Tools for Learning: ABRACADABRA in Kenya. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 48(1), 1–29. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=158874222&site=ehost-live

Mariapan, R. (2018). Innovative assignment rubrics for ODL courses: design, implementation and impact. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2018-0009

Martinovic, D., Ratkovi, S., Spencer, T., Grierson, A., Cantalini-Williams, M., & Landon, S. (2018). Engaged Scholarship in Action: The Journey of the School Board – University Research Exchange (SURE) Network. Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning, 3(2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v3i2.330

Matsumura, L., & Wang, E. (2014). Principals’ Sensemaking of Coaching for Ambitious Reading Instruction in a High-Stakes Accountability Policy Environment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(51).

Matúšová, S. (2021). Innovations in Online Education in Post-COVID-19. Proceedings, 7th ERAZ Conference, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2021.23

Menexes, G. & Economou, A. (2016). Technical Report CI3/16: Rules and Guidelines for the Design and Compilation of a Questionnaire. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Geography, Forestry and Natural Environment, Department of Geography.

Miloš Hitka, Silvia Lorincová, Milota Vetráková, Iveta Hajdúchová, I. A. (2020). Factors Related to Gender and Education Affecting Employee Motivation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability ISSUES, 7(4), 3226–3241. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi

Mykhailyshyn, H., Kondur, O., & Serman, L. (2019). Innovation of Education and Educational Innovations in Conditions of Modern Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.5.1.9-16

Omelyanenko, V., Semenets-Orlova, I., Khomeriki, O., Lyasota, L., & Medviedieva, Y. (2018). Technology transfer management culture (education-based approach). Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(3), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.36

Osmanović-Zajić, J., & Maksimović, J. (2020). Contemporary teachers’ action research: Basis for the development of reflective practice in education. Research in Pedagogy, 10(2), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2002354o

Pliushch, V. (2022). Innovative pedagogical technologies in the education system. Revista Tempos e Espaços Em Educação, 15(34). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v15i34.16960

Porta, M. (2014). A Dictionary of Epidemiology (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Reeves, P.M., Pun, W.H., & Chung, K. S. (2017). Influence of teacher collaboration on job satisfaction and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 227–236.

Reuters. (2025). China primary, secondary schools to beef up science education. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-primary-secondary-schools-beef-up-science-education-2025-01-24/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Riveras-León, J. C., & Tomàs-Folch, M. (2020). The organizational culture of innovative schools: The role of the principal. Journal of Educational Sciences, 42(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.35923/jes.2020.2.02

Rodés Paragarino, V., & Gewerc, A. (2023). Educational Innovation, Open Educational Resources, and Gender in Latin American Universities. Education Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010019

Sedgwick, P. (2014). Cross-sectional studies: Advantages and disadvantages. BMJ (Online), 348(March), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2276

Selezneva, Y. (2020). Innovative potential of a teacher in a new reality: challenge and response. E3S Web of Conferences, 210, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018041

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-10-2016-0007

Seryapina, Y. (2018). The Concept of “Readiness for Pedagogical Activity”: Motivational Readiness, Psychological Readiness, Readiness to Innovative Activity. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences., 10(4), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.14529/ped180410

Setia, M. (2016). Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410.

Shamanska, O. (2022). The Strategic Model of Adult Education Development in Ukraine. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 54(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23856/5410

Sharmila, P. (2022). Innovations in Teaching - Learning in Higher Educational Institutions in the Current Scenario. IARS’ International Research Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.51611/iars.irj.v12i01.2022.219

Smak, M., & Walczak, D. (2017). The prestige of the teaching profession in the perception of teachers and former teachers. Edukacja, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.24131/3724.170502

Sodergren, C. D. C., Kettler, T., Sulak, T., & Payne, A. (2023). Teacher Self-Efficacy, Innovativeness, and Preparation to Teach Cross-Curriculum Skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(1), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1104747

Stasewitsch, E., Dokuka, S., & Kauffeld, S. (2022). Promoting educational innovations and change through networks between higher education teachers. Tertiary Education and Management, 28(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-021-09086-0

Stumbrienė, D., Jevsikova, T., & Kontvainė, V. (2024). Key factors influencing teachers’ motivation to transfer technology-enabled educational innovation. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 29, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11891-6

Susilawati, S., Fitria, H., & Eddy, S. (2018). The Effect of Principal’s Leadership Style and Teacher’s Job Satisfaction on Teacher’s Performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 2(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v4i3.482

Suyuti, S. (2024). Students for the 21st Century Workforce Pentingnya Kreativitas dan Inovasi dalam Pendidikan: Bagaimana Mempersiapkan Siswa Menghadapi Dunia Kerja Abad 21. Education Studies and Teaching Journal (EDUTECH), 1(1), 80–92.

Theodoropoulos, N., & Kiprianos, P. (2020). Teachers and Creativity: The Role of Internal Motives. International Journal of Education, 12(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i3.17746

Trimmer, K. (2017). Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Risk-taking in Decision-making by School Principals. Athens Journal of Education, 4(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.4-3-3

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15(October 2017), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002

Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Alcantar-Nieblas, C., Glasserman-Morales, L. D., & Nuñez-Rodríguez, X. (2024). Development of Social Entrepreneurship Competencies and Complex Thinking in an Intensive Course of Open Educational Innovation. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.12187

Wai, C. P. (2017). Innovation and Social Impact in Higher Education: Some Lessons from Tohoku University and the Open University of Hong Kong. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.4236/JSS.2017.59011

Walder, A. (2017). Pedagogical innovation in Canadian higher education: professors’ perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Research, 54, 71–82.

Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, K., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Understanding teacher emotional exhaustion: exploring the role of teaching motivation, perceived autonomy, and teacher–student relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.

Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012

Wong, T. M. (2018). Teaching innovations in Asian higher education: perspectives of educators. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-12-2018-0032

Yorulmaz, A., Çokçaliskan, H., & Önal, H. (2016). Determination of Classroom Pre-Service Teachers’ State of Personal Innovativeness. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5, 28–34.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-18

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 7 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).