ENGAGING LEARNERS IN MATHEMATICS 2 ACTIVITIES THROUGH MARIS-PARES TECHNIQUE

Authors

  • Crystal V. Limos College of Teacher Education, Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines
  • Engelyn D. Basilio College of Teacher Education, Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines
  • Lyra L. Dela Cruz College of Teacher Education, Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines
  • Romely M. Burogsay College of Teacher Education, Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines
  • May Flor C. Rivera College of Teacher Education, Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i7.6091

Keywords:

Maris-Pares Technique, pupil’s participation, Mathematics II

Abstract

This study was conducted to increase pupils’ level of engagement in Mathematics II. Due to the limited classroom interaction in the new normal set-up, learners have developed passive behavior in participating in different classroom activities. One of the subjects where pupils show poor engagement is Mathematics. Hence, we designed an intervention to improve the passive behavior of Grade 2 learners and increase their level of engagement in Mathematics. The data were obtained from the twelve (12) identified passive Grade 2 learners. Purposive sampling was employed in identifying the subjects of the study. Pre-observation was conducted to determine the level of engagement of the respondents, which was followed by the post-observation after the Maris-Pares Technique was implemented. Mean and t-test were used to treat the gathered data. Before the implementation of the intervention, the respondents were slightly engaged in Mathematics. The findings revealed that the Maris-Pares Technique contributes to the improvement of the Mathematics engagement of the respondents. Hence, the more the respondents are exposed to the Maris-Pares Technique, the higher the chance of their engagement in Mathematics activities.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biography

  • May Flor C. Rivera, College of Teacher Education, Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines

    Professor May Flor C. Rivera, a faculty member in the Early Childhood and Special Needs Education Department at MMSU-CTE, brings expertise in early childhood education, inclusive education, and instructional materials design for young learners. Her research contributions are published on Google Scholar and ResearchGate, and her profile is available on the Mariano Marcos State University website. The authors' combined expertise strengthens this research and contributes to best practices in special education.

References

Bakker, A. B., Vergel, A. I., & Kunter, M. (2013). Teacher engagement and student learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031260

Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., & Patton, G. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 357.e9–357.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.013

Biju, S. M. (2019). Benefits of working in pairs in problem solving and algorithms - Action research. Athens Journal of Education, 6(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.6-3-4

DeVito, M. (2016). Factors influencing student engagement. (Master’s thesis, Rowan University). Rowan Digital Works. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/1515

Dyer, K. (2015, September 17). Research proof points – Better student engagement improves

student learning. Teach. Learn. Grow. Retrieved from https://www.nwea.org/blog/2015/research-proof-points-better-student-engagement-improves-student-learning/

Dyler K., September 17, 2017, Research proof points: Better student engagement improves student learning, https://www.nwea.org/blog/2015/research-proof-points-better-student-engagement-improves-student-learning/

Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221

Gafoor, K. A., & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Why high school students feel mathematics difficult? An exploration of affective beliefs. Paper presented at the UGC Sponsored National Seminar on Pedagogy of Teacher Education, Trends and Challenges, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Jeremy D. Finn, Gina M. Pannozzo, and Kristin E. Voelk, Disruptive and Inattentive-Withdrawn Behavior and Achievement among Fourth Graders, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/461853

McDonough, K. (2004). Learner–learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003

Scott, T. M., & Kamps, D. M. (2007). The future of functional behavioral assessment in school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 32(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290703200301

Takase, M., Niitani, M., Imai, T., & Okada, M. (2019). Students' perceptions of teaching factors that demotivate their learning in lectures and laboratory-based skills practice. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 6(4), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.08.001

Ukobizaba, F., Ndihokubwayo, K., & Uworwabayeho, A. (2020). Teachers’ behaviours towards vital interactions that attract students’ interest to learn mathematics and career development. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 16(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v16i1.7

University of Washington, Center for Teaching and Learning https://teaching.washington.edu/topics/engaging-students-in-learning/

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

Issue

Section

Articles