SCRUTINIZING EMPATHY FEELING WITHIN SCHOOL BULLYING STUDENTS

Authors

  • Mohammad Fakhri IAIN Mataram, Indonesia
  • Punadji Setyosari Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, State University of Malang, Indonesia
  • Wayan Ardhana Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, State University of Malang, Indonesia
  • Nur Hidayah Department of Guidance and Counseling, Faculty of Education, State University of Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.635

Keywords:

empathy characteristic, school bullying students, cognitive empathy, affective empathy

Abstract

This study aims at explaining the characteristic of cognitive empathy and affective empathy within school bullying students on Madrasah Aliyah Al-Barokah Mataram. This study is a case study with the subject of study are four students of school bullying which is identified by school cumulative record, one counseling teacher, and two classroom teachers. The data of the study were obtained through interview, field observation, photos documentation, as well as personal and school document. The data were in the form of spoken or written discourse and observable behavior and attitude of the object. The data, then, were analyzed through data reduction, data exposition, and conclusion or data verification. The result of the study showed that the empathy of the school bullying students was dominantly influenced by social and family circumstance. The characteristics are 1) ethnic perspective taking in which the students are not able to take other’s perspective. They could not put themselves in the other’s shoes well, 2) empathic feeling and expression in which the students could not feel empathy to the other who possesses different value, cultural, and custom background.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Al-Rodhan, N. R. F. (2006). Definition of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a proposed Definition. Geneve: Program on the Geopolitical Implications of Globalization and Transnational Security. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/56147025/Definitions-of-Globalization-A-Comprehensive-Overview-and-a-Proposed-Definition.

Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175.

Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education; An Introduction to theory and Methods. Nedham Heights: A Divison of Simon Schuster., Inc.

Cotton, K., (2004). Developing Empathy in Children and Youth. School improvement research series: Close-up 13. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Davis, M. H (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy; Evidence for multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons. New York: Basic Books.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

Howe, D. (2012). Empathy: What it is and Why it matters. United Kingdom: Palgrave Mcmillan.

Karen E. Gardes; Elizabeth A Segal (2009) A Social Model Of Empathy. Journal Social Psychology at Arizona State University.Vol.10.No.2.114-127. USA. New York.

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Pusat Kurikulum. 2009. Pengembangan dan Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa: Pedoman Sekolah.

Lickona, T. (2004). Character Matters. New York: A Touchstone Book, Published by Simon & Schuter.

Miles; Huberman (1994) Qualitatif Data Analysis, Second Edition; London Sage Publication. Inc.

Nones, A. P., Happe, F. G., Gilbert, F., Burnett, S., & Viding, E. (2010). Feeling, caring, knowing: different types of empathy deficit in boys with psychopathic tendencies and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 51(11), 1188-1197. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02280.x

Published

2017-04-04

Issue

Section

Articles