BUSINESS EDUCATORS’ EDUCATIONAL AWARENESS AND ADOPTION OF WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES FOR INSTRUCTIONAL PURPOSES IN TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH EAST NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.689Keywords:
business educators, web 2.0, instructional purposesAbstract
Education today has gone digital and has created the need for players in the sector to appreciate the benefits of utilizing Web 2.0 technologies for educational purposes. This study set out to assess business educators’ awareness and adoption of adoption of Web 2.0 technologies for instructional purposes in tertiary institutions in south east Nigeria. Two research questions guided the study. Four null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. Population of the study was 144 business educators teaching in tertiary institutions offering business education programme in south east Nigeria. A structured 5-point scale questionnaire was used for the study. The questionnaire was validated by one expert in ICT and two experts in measurement and evaluation. The reliability of the instrument was established using Split half method. Data collected in respect of the research questions were analyzed using mean of scores while t-test was used to test the null hypotheses. The results revealed that the respondents were moderately aware of the educational benefits of Web 2.0 technologies and adopted Web 2.0 technologies for instructional purposes to a very low extent. The result also revealed that age was a critical factor in business educators’ rating of awareness and adoption of Web 2.0 technologies for instructional purposes while gender, sex, years of experience in teaching and type of institution did not affect the respondents’ ratings. It was recommended, among others, that business educators should be abreast of all emerging technologies and be attuned to the contemporary methods and applications of web technologies in the instructional process.
Article visualizations:
References
Ahmed, A. K. (2013). Teacher-centered versus learner centered teaching style. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9 (1), 22-34.
Ajise, B. & Fagbola, O. O (2013). Awareness and usage of Web 2.0 tools among lecturers in Nigeria universities: Implications for teaching and learning in schools. Nigerian School Library Journal, 12, 93-107.
Anunobi, C. & Ogbonna, A. (2012). Web 2.0 use by librarians in a state in Nigeria. Developing Country Studies, 2(5), 7-66.
Baker, J. H. (2003). The learning log. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(1), 11-13.
Baker, S.C., Wentz, R.K., & Woods, M.M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 59-64. doi: 10.1080/00986280802529079.
Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from ‘Media Richness Theory’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 9(1), 1-22.
Baxter, G. J., Connolly, T. M., Stansfield, M. H., Tsvetkova, N., & Stoimenova, B. (2011). Introducing Web 2.0 in Education: A Structured Approach Adopting a Web 2.0 Implementation Framework. Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWeSP), 499-504.
Collins, E., & Hide, B. (2010). Use and relevance of Web 2.0 resources for researchers. Retrieved from http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/119_elpub2010.content.pdf
Crook, C., Cummings, J., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C.,…Sharples, M. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape-opportunities, challenges and tension. Becta Leading Next Generation Learning Research Reports, 1-72.
Di Napoli, R. (2004). What is student centered learning. Educational Initiative Centre (EIC) Guide. Retrieved from http://www.westminster.ac.uk/
Echeng, R., Usoro, A., & Majewski, G. (2013). Acceptance of Web 2.0 in learning in higher education. A case study, Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(10), 146-151.
Elloitt, B. (2008). Assessment 2.0: modernizing assessment in the age of Web 2.0. Glasgow: Scottish Qualification Authority
Ementa, C. N. & Ile, C. M. (2016). Business educators’ awareness and adoption of Web 2.0 technologies for educational instruction in tertiary institutions in south east Nigeria. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(1), 216-224. doi: 10.5430/irhe.v1n1p216
Enonbun, O. (2010). Constructivism and Web 2.0 in the emerging learning Era: A global perspective. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability 6(4), 17-27.
Fowler, C.J. H., & Mayes, T.J. (2000). Learning relationship from theory to design. In Squires, D., Conole, G., & Jacobs, G. (Eds.), The Changing Face of Learning Technology. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Harris, A. L., & Lea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact in IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137-144.
Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology and Peopl, 18(2), 142-171.doi:10.1108/09593840510601513.
Igberaharha, O. C. (2009). Issues of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): Assessment of teaching and learning of business courses. Business Education Journal 2 (1), 95- 105.
Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate web 2.0 in school practice: Towards a framework for pedagogy 2.0. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 29(2), 248-267
Kop, R. & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9 (3), Retrieved from www.irrodle.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking and websites and teens: An Overview. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/2/198/report_display
Light, D. & Polin, D. K. (2010). Integrating Web 2.0 tools into the classroom: changing the culture of learning. Center for Children and Technology, Education Development Center. Retrieved from http://cct.edu.org/publications/integrating-web-20-tools-classroom-changing-culture-learning
Mamman, J.S. & Nwabufo, B. N. (2014). Barriers to integration of Web 2.0 technologies in teaching/learning of business education courses in Nigerian universities. Business Education Journal 2 (1), 28- 38.
McGarr, O. (2009). A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 25(3), 309-321.
McGee, J.B., & Begg, M. (2008). What medical educators need to know about ‘Web 2.0’. Medical Teacher, 30(2), 164-169.
Meyer, K. A., & Xu, Y. J. (2009). A causal model of factors influencing faculty use of technology. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 57-70.
Mtega, W.P., Dulle, F. W., Malekani, A. W., & Chailla, A. W. (2014). Awareness and use of Web 2.0 technologies in sharing of agricultural knowledge in Tanzania. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 6 (2), 188-202.
Namgyel, T. (2013). Teacher-centered instructional delivery affecting students’ learning. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 17(2), 60-69.
Nazatul-Aini, A. M. (2014). Integration of Web 2.0 tools in learning a programme course. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(4), 88-94
Okolocha, C.C, Ile, C.M. & Okolocha, C. B. (2012). Business educator’s familiarity with the utilization of hi-tech tools in the preparation of graduates for modern business/marketing in Nigeria. Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce 3(2), 1-8.
Okpala, P.N. (March, 2014). Professional ethics and innovative practices in education in the 21st century. Keynote address at the 2nd international conference of Faculty of Education, at University Auditorium, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.
O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software? Communications and Strategies, 65, 17-37.
Polka, W. (2001). Facilitating the transition from teacher centered to student centered instruction at the university level via constructivist principles and customized learning plans. Educational Planning 13(3), 55-61.
Ramanau, R., & Geng, F. (2009). Researching the use of wikis to facilitate group work. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 1(1), 2620-2626.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.463.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory of digital age. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
Stern, J. (2008). Introduction to Web 2.0 technologies. Retrieved from http://www.wlac.edu/.../Web_2.0%20v.02.pdf
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Vygoysky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Weller, A. (2013). The use of web 2.0 technology for pre-service teacher learning in science education. Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 40-46.
Wilclox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie-Gauld, M. (2005). ‘It was nothing to do with the University, it was just the people’: The role of social support in the first year of higher education. Studies in Higher Education 30 (6), 707-722
Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G, & Yuen, P.K. (2011). Perceptions, interests and use: Teachers and Web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 7(2), 109-123.
Zohrabi, M; Torabi, M. A. & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student-centered learning: English in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2 (3), 18-30. doi:10.5539/ells.v2n3p18
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
