RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHEMISTRY LABORATORY WORK AND STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN CHEMISTRY, IN KILIFI NORTH CONSTITUENCY, KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.722Keywords:
chemistry laboratory, academic performance, KenyaAbstract
Despite the fact that Chemistry is the gatekeeper and backbone of other science subjects, the general performance in Chemistry among secondary school students countrywide remains poor. Research evidence shows that poor performance in Chemistry not only results from intrinsic conceptual difficulties in the subject but also springs from poor Chemistry Laboratory work. However, Chemistry educationists seem to be in disagreement with respect to the relationship between Chemistry Laboratory work and students’ academic performance in Chemistry. This study, therefore, sought to find out the relationship between Chemistry Laboratory work and students’ academic performance in Chemistry. The study was guided by John Dewey’s Constructivist Learning theory. The study was conducted in Kilifi North Constituency. The research design was correlation, simple random sampling was used to select one girl school, six mixed schools, and Purposive sampling was used to select one boys’ school. Stratified random sampling and simple random sampling were used to select 80 students. Data was collected by use of Student Questionnaire (SQ) and through analysis of documents and mark sheet form. Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) was used to facilitate data analysis. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used. The level of significant used in the study was 0.05. The findings revealed, 27.5% of schools utilize the expected 11-13 lessons per term, 33.75% utilizes 7-10 lessons and 38.75% utilizes 3-6 lessons. The findings emerging from this study also revealed that there was a significant positive relationship between; the use of chemistry laboratory and student’s academic performance in chemistry. In conclusion, students whose teachers always take them to the laboratory during practical lessons performed better in practical examinations.
Article visualizations:
References
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methodology in Education. Routledge: Falmer.
Dahar, M. F., & Faize, F.A. (2011).Effects 0f the availability and the science laboratory on Academic Achievement of students in Punjab (Pakistan). European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol.51 (2), 193-202.
Farounbi, M. (1998). Resource concentration, utilization and management correlates of students’. Learning outcomes: a study in school quality in Oyo State. University of Ibadan: Unpublished PhD Thesis.
Gatara, T. (2010). Introduction to: Research Methodology: Nairobi: The Olive Marketing and Publishing Company.
Hofstein, A., Shore, R. & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (1), 47 – 62.
Keys, W.C., Hand, B., Vaughin, P. & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (3), 1065-1084.
Kitheka, A. M. (2005). Factors Contributing to Students Poor Performance in the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education. Kenyatta University: Unpublished Master’s Thesis.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd, Publishers.
Kurbanoglu, A., Izzet, R., Akim, W. & Ahmet, W. (2010). The Relationships between University Students’ Chemistry Laboratory Anxiety, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (8), 27-30.
Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, A. (2003). Research Method; Qualitative & Quantitative
Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.
Munyori, B. (2006, March 6). Shame of National School. The Standard, P.4.
Ngarauya, G., Kimaru, J., & Mburu, P. (2004). Secondary chemistry form one. Nairobi: longhorn Publishers.
Obwacha, B. (2005, October 6). The Sick Man of National School. The Standards P.25.
Ongeri, S. (2012, March 1). Declining trend in chemistry performance. The daily Nation, P 2.
Prince, D.S. (2011). Extensiveness and Perceptions of Lecture Demonstrations in the High School Chemistry Classroom. Theses, Student Research and Creative Activity: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education.Paper12. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnstudent/12.
Tobin, K.G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403-418.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), (2005). United Nations Decade Education for Sustainable Development 2005-20014. Paris: UNESCO.
Woolnough, B. & Alsop, T. (1985). Practical Work in Science. London: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
