DESIGNING THE INNOVATIVE LEARNING MANAGEMENT PLANS IN FORM OF THE STEM EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD TO DEVELOP THE PRIMARY STUDENTS OF THEIR CREATIVE THINKING LEARNING PROCESSES IN SCIENCE CLASS AT THE 2ND GRADE LEVEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.724Keywords:
instructional design, the innovative learning management lesson plans, STEM education method, primary students, creative thinking learning processes, science classAbstract
The purposes of this research study for designing the innovative learning management lesson plans in the form of the STEM Education Method (STEMe) on Magnetic Force Issue in science class which were to develop an innovative learning management lesson plan that based on the model of learning management with the STEMe, students’ learning achievements of their assessing pretest and posttest techniques based on the STEMe were compared, students’ creative thinking abilities (CTA) of their pre-CAT and post-CAT based on the model of learning management with the STEMe were assessed, and students’ learning achievements of their assessing posttest and their creative thinking abilities based on the model of learning management with the STEMe were associated. Administering this research target group which a sample consisted of 32-primary students at the 2nd grade level in the second semester in the academic year 2016 from Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Demonstration School under the Office of Higher Educational Commission was selected. Using a main Innovative Learning Management Lesson Plan (ILMLP) in the form of the STEMe in 14 hours was designed. Students’ learning outcomes of their pretest and posttest assessments were obtained using the 30-item Science Achievement Test (SAT). Students’ performances of their creative thinking abilities were determined using the 8-item Creative Thinking Ability Assessment (CTAA). Statistically significant with means, standard deviation, percentage, independent t-test, simple and multiple correlations of Pearson’s movement correlation were analyzed. The results of these research finding have found that followed as: The innovative learning management plans in the form of the STEMe were evaluated to determine performance criteria with the efficiency of the processing performance and the performance results (E1/E2) of the ILMLP to management of students’ activities in science class indicated that of 99.55/80.10. The average mean scores of students’ post learning achievements was a higher than the learning outcomes of their pre-test with the LAT on Magnetic Force Issue were differentiated evidence at the 0.01 level, significantly. Comparisons between students’ creativity thinking abilities of their pre-SAT and post-SAT assessments were assessed with the CTAA based on the model of learning management with the STEMe were differentiated that evidence of statistically significant at the 0.01 level. Associations between students’ learning outcomes of their posttest (SAT) assessment and their creative thinking abilities (CTAA) toward science in science class were related of the variance in previous critical thinking abilities and science rerated that evidence of statistically significant at the 0.01 level.
Article visualizations:
References
Boonruang, S. (2015). A STEM education: A new method of teaching science, technology, engineering and mathematics in an applied approach is being promoted by the IPST. Bangkok Post. Retrieved on 14 January 2015 from: http://www.bangkokpost.com/tech/local-news/456725/a-stem-education
Burry-Stock, A. J., Shaw, G. D., Laurie, C. and Chissom, S. B. (2017). Rater Agreement Indexes for Performance Assessment. Retrieved on 7 May 2017 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247728120_Rater_Agreement_Indexes_for_Performance_Assessment
Doyle, A. (2017). Creative thinking definition, skills, and example. Retrieved on 2 March 2017 from website: https://www.thebalance.com/creative-thinking-definition-with-examples-2063744
Kearsley, G. and Culatta, R. (2014). Instructional design. Retrieved from http://www.instructionaldesign.org/instructional_designers/kearsley.html
Lynch, D. and Smith, R. (2006). The learning management design process. Pearson Education Australia, French’s Forest NSW: pp. 53 - 67.
Mayer, Richard E (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology. 84(4): pp. 405–412.
Merrill, M. D.; Drake, L.; Lacy, M. J.; Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design (PDF). Educational Technology. 36(5): pp. 5–7.
Milkova, S. (2012). Strategies for effective lesson plan. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from http://keansburg.schoolwires.net/cms/lib02/NJ01001933/Centricity/Domain/63/Strategies%20for%20Effective%20Lesson%20Planning%20copy.pdf
New Jersey Technology and Engineering Educator Association. (2015). STEM education resource. Retrieved from http://njteeastem.weebly.com/stem-resources.html
Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University. (2015). Overview on Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University. Retrieved from http://www.4icu.org/reviews/9435.htm
UNICEF. (2016). Overview of Thailand education. Retrieved on 18 June 2016 from https://www.unicef.org/thailand/education_303.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


