EFFECTIVENESS AMONG DIFFERENT STRATEGIES OF WEB-BASED INSTRUCTION IN LEARNING PHRASAL VERBS IN ENGLISH

Authors

  • B. Yamini Research Scholar, Department of Education Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641 046, India
  • M. Malarvizhi Asst. Professor, Dr., Department of Education Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641 046, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.735

Keywords:

web-based instruction, online phrasal verbs, instructional strategies, educational modules, communicative English

Abstract

The results of the study reveal that the performance of e­learners on Communicative English is excelling. Pre­test, Post­test Equivalent Groups Design was adopted to be the most appropriate method of research in testing the spelt out hypotheses. It is concluded that the web-based learning strategies are effective in realizing the instructional objectives.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Browne, L., Mehra, S., Rattan, R., & Thomas, G. (2004). Comparing lecture and e-learning as pedagogies for new and experienced professionals in dentistry. British dental journal, 197(2), 95-7.

Buzhardt, J., &Semb, G. (2005). Integrating online instruction in a college classroom to improve cost effectiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 63-66.

Dalton, D.W &Hannafm, M. H. (1988). The Effects of Computer Assisted and Traditional Mastery Methods on Computation Accuracy and Attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 27-34.

Dudency, G. (2000). The Internet and the Language Classroom, Cambridge University Press.

Grabe, M., & Sigler, E. (2002). Studying online: evaluation of an online study environment. Computers & Education, 38(4), 375-383Lin, C. Y., Cheng, Y. J., Chang, Y. T., & Hu, R. P. (2002). The use of Internet-based learning in biology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(3), 237-242.

Kekkonen Moneta, S., & Moneta, G.B. (2003). E-Learning in Hong Kong comparing learning outcomes in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory computing course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 423-433.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practices in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.

Mary Silver, (2004). E-learning for the pump industry. World Pumps, 453, 28-31.

Meera, S. (2000). Relative Effectiveness among Different Modes of Computer-Based Instruction in Relation to Students’ Personality Traits. Doctorial Thesis, Bharathiyar University.

VirginioCantoni, Massimo Cellario, & Marco Porta. (2004). Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of VisualLanguages & Computing, 15(5), 333-345.

Wright, G., & Betts, H.J. (2002). Virtual universities - the reality of e-leaming. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 90, 752-6.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-17

Issue

Vol 3, No 5 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).