POWER HEGEMONY: MARITIME ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION DIALECTICS ON POLITEKNIK MARITIM NEGERI, INDONESIA

Authors

  • Sri Tutie Rahayu Department Port and Shipping Management, Politeknik Maritim Negeri Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.971

Keywords:

organizational transformation, planned change organization, continuity transformation, international competency integration, hegemonic

Abstract

The purposes of this research are: 1) Describe the organizational transformation process of SGC into Polimarin; 2) Describe the dialectic (process) that occurs during the SGC transformation process into Polimarin. The type of this research is qualitative case study with single case (single case single analysis). Four themes in the analysis: Theme 1 "preparing the land", theme 2 "finding the seed", theme 3 "waiting for planting season", theme 4 "planting and bloom though cannot be harvested yet". Existing institutional actors in the four themes are the main actors in Polimarin, Directorate General of Higher Education, Directorate General of Sea Transportation and IMO (International Maritime Organization).

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Balancing act: How to Capture Knowledge without Killing it. Harvard Business Review.

Cresswel, J. F. (2013). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Design Riset (3 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fautanu, I. (2012). Filsafat Ilmu, Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta.

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. (1989). Organisasi: Perilaku, Struktur, Proses. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Gouillart, F. J., & Kelly, J. N. (1995). Transforming the Organization. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Do Inquiry Paradigms Imply Inquiry Methodologies? (D. M. Fatterman, Ed.) New York: Praeger, 89-115.

Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 383-396.

Kasali, R. (2005). Change. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (1996). Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Kural, M., & Kocakülah, S. M. (2016). Teaching for Hot Conceptual Change: Towards a New Model, Beyond the Cold and Warm Ones. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(8), 2.

Levit, B., & March, J. G. (1998). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.

Orlikowski, W. (1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information System Research, 7(1), 63-92.

Passmore. (1994). Shaping From Shading I: Surface Curvature And Orientation Vision Research. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/showciting?cid=2510871.

Schermerhorn, J. R., & Wright, B. (2007). Management Fundamentals. Canadian.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage.

Suyanto, B. (2013). Filsafat Sosial. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.

Van, W. R., & Khan, S. (2007). Redefining Case Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2).

Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational Change and Development, Annual Review of Psychology. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361., 50, 361-386.

Yin, R. K. (2005). Studi Kasus (Design dan Metode). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Published

2017-08-20

Issue

Section

Articles