PROBLEMS OF OUSL CENTRE NETWORK IN 2007 AND 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.987Keywords:
comparing problems 2007 and 2017, Open University of Sri Lanka, student satisfaction, regional and study centres, student support services, suggestionsAbstract
The Open University of Sri Lanka (OUSL) is highly concerned about the student satisfaction. One major reason for the concern is that dissatisfaction leads to dropping out of students. Undoubtedly, high rates of dropouts mean high wastage of resources. Therefore, these institutions are concerned about student satisfaction and a common approach to ensure satisfaction is to provide Student Support Services (SSS). The expectation of the institutions is to increase student satisfaction so that success rates would increase. A strategy adopted by the OUSL similar to many other Open Universities is to operate a network of centers in order to facilitate the provision of SSS. At the same time, the centers themselves face problems in the provision of SSS and these in turn can affect student satisfaction. The main aim of this study is to compare the problems faced by the OUSL network of centres in the provision of SSS in 2007 and 2017. The study also aimed to identify the SSS currently provided by the OUSL network of centres, the current problems faced by them in the provision of SSS and to make suggestions to minimize the problems. In 2007, there existed only 4 regional centres and 17 study centres in the centre network while now the number of regional centres has gone up to 8 and the number of study centres has increased up to 27. The instruments used to collect data were a questionnaire and an interview schedule. The analysis of data was done qualitatively. The findings revealed that although some of the problems that existed 10 years ago were solved some still existed may be to a lesser degree. Additionally a few fresh problems currently faced by the centres of the OUSL centre network were also identified. Suggestions were given to minimize the problems.
Article visualizations:
References
Comacho K. 1996. ‘Barriers to completion of a nurse-midwifery distance education program’ Distance Education (XI) pp 111-31
Gupta S. P. 2000 ‘Compositions, problems and motivating factors of correspondence course students’ Indian journal of Open Learning 9(2), 211-6
Holmberg B. (1995). Theory and practice of Distance Education London, Routledge
Jayathissa H. G. (1999). Effects on job satisfaction on delivery of service unpublished thesis PGDM Colombo, OUSL
Lekamge G. D. Ranawaka G. Gunaratna, K. A. R. D. & Jayananda R. (1999). ‘Student satisfaction with OUSL support services’ OUSL Journal, 2. 80-92
Lockwood F. & Gooly A. (2001). Innovation in Open and Distance learning. London, Kogan Page
Mirja S. & Singh S.P. (2014) Effectiveness of Student Support Services Provided by Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 5 No 26 November 2014 p124
Ragunath K. (1994). Management of Distance Education Delhi, Ajantha
Sharma M. C. (2001). ‘Teacher education through distance mode: An in depth study, Indian Journal of Open Learning. 10(2), 193-202
Tait A. (2000). ‘Planning student support for Open and Distance Learning’ Open Learning. 15(3), 287-99.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


