THE EFFECT OF MATHEMATICS TEACHING THROUGH POLYA’S PROBLEM SOLVING STEPS UPON 4TH GRADE STUDENTS’ SUCCESS OF SOLVING MATHEMATIC PROBLEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.992Keywords:
activity, mathematics problems, mathematics levelAbstract
In this research, the effect of mathematics teaching through Polya’s problem solving steps upon problem solving success of the elementary education 4th grade students was analyzed in terms of various variables. In the study, “pre-test and post-test control-group design” was used semi-experimentally as the research method. In semi-experimental designs, there is an experimental approach in which no random distribution is used for categorizing the individuals as experimental and control groups. However, the participants’ being at a fairly similar quality is regarded. The participants who participated into the study were selected among the 4th grade students studying at two state elementary schools in Adana province in 2014-2015 academic year creating one experimental group and one control group. The data collection tools were student information form and Problem Solving Success Determination Test prepared by the researcher under the control of an expert. Obtained data were transferred into the computer environment using SPSS 22 statistical software. During the data analysis, whether there was a statistical difference between post-test scores of the experimental and control groups was tested using independent groups t-test. For other comparisons, t-test and one-way variance analysis were performed. These results were concluded as result of the analyses. According to t-test results, problem solving success level did not differ significantly according to the age and gender of the students. Problem solving success level differed significantly according to the profession of mother and father. The problem solving success level did not differ significantly according to the socio-economic status of the family. Problem-solving success level significantly differed according to the educational status of mother; however, did not differ significantly according to the educational status of father. In terms of the analysis results on the difference in mathematical problem solving success of the students, it was concluded that success of the students increased in a problem solving process supported with activities and administered with Polya’s problem solving steps accurately.
Article visualizations:
References
Altun, M. (2010). İlköğretim 2.Kademe Matematik Öğretimi. (7.Baskı). Ankara: Alfa Aktüel Yayıncılık.
Alver, B. (2005). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Problem Çözme Becerileri Ve Akademik Başarılarının Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, sayı, 21, 75-88.
Arsal, Z. (2009). Problem Çözme Stratejilerinin Problem Çözme Başarısını Yordama Gücü. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 103-113.
Bahar, H.H. (2006). KPSS Puanlarının Akademik Başarı Ve Cinsiyet Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 31(140), 68-74.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001). Deneysel desenler, Öntest-Sontest, Kontrol Grubu Desen ve Veri Analizi. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
Gürsakal, S. (2012). PISA 2009 Öğrenci Başarı Düzeylerini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 441-452.
Kal, F. M. (2013). Matematiksel Modelleme Etkinliklerinin İlköğretim 6.Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Matematik Problemi Çözme Tutumlarına Etkisi. Yükseklisans Tezi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
Kılıç, E. & Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). “Cinsiyet Ve Öğrenme Stilinin Gezinme Stratejisi Ve Başarıya Etkisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), s.129-146.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, (2012). Matematik Dersi (1-5.Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı, Ankara.
Okur, M., Tatar, E. & İşleyen, T. (2006). “İlköğretim Düzeyinde Problem Çözme Yaklaşımları”, Journal of Qafqaz University, sayı 18, s.166-170.
Öksüzler, O. & Sürekçi, D. (2010). “İlköğretimde Başarıyı Etkileyen Faktörler: Bir Sıralı Lojit Yaklaşımı”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 47 (543), s.93-103.
Özkal, N. & Çetingöz, D. (2006). “Akademik Başarı, Cinsiyet, Tutum Ve Öğrenme Stratejilerinin Kullanımı”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 12(2), s.259-275.
Özsoy, G. (2012). Deneme modeli. http://kisi.deu.edu.tr//yilmaz.ahmet/birinci_donem_makale/01_bilim_ve_tarih/01bilim/04.pdf adresinden 29.11.2014 tarihinde alınmıştır.
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It. Princeton N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Saracaloğlu, A. S., Serin, O., & Bozkurt, N. (2001). “Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Öğrencilerinin Problem Çözme Becerileri İle Başarıları Arasındaki İlişki”, Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, sayı 14, s.121-134.
Ural, A. & Çınar, F.N. (2014). “Anne ve Babanın Eğitim Düzeyinin Öğrencinin Matematik Başarısına Etkisi”, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(4), s.41-56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
