ADVANCING KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY THROUGH EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SKILLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i4.5253Paraules clau:
learning, education, research management, postgraduate, SoTLResum
The knowledge economy is a system of consumption and production that is based on intellectual capital. Specifically, this refers to the ability to capitalize on scientific discoveries and applied research including research studies at the university. To develop a successful post-graduate program in research needs a robust and sustainable research environment. A guideline named "Best Practices for PhD Training" was produced by the Organization for PhD Education in Health Sciences in the European System, a European platform to promote best practices in PhD education in health sciences. The extensive advice and suggestions made in the guidelines apply to all aspects of PhD and research programs, of which supervision is a crucial part. The success of a thesis depends on a productive supervisor-student relationship built on respect, accountability, and engagement. Active researchers who obtain training to hone their overseeing abilities should serve as supervisors. They act as both scientific and moral role models in academic life. The employment of a second supervisor in addition to the primary one is strongly advised to boost monitoring student development more effectively and to prevent interpersonal disputes. The obligations of the supervisor should be outlined in institutional regulations. The task could be more clearly defined and may serve as a beginning point in a contract created by the institution and signed by the supervisor and the student. Grievance methods must be plain and obvious in the event of a conflict. Students' professional development should be supported by their supervisors, who should also help them become autonomous researchers. Quite a number of surveys revealed considerable dissatisfaction among students with their supervisors. There is a great deal of strain due to performance pressure on both students and supervisors. Students worry about their future employment opportunities. These stress spots should be taken into account by institutional regulations to improve the welfare of both professors and students. Small-group instruction and learning have become increasingly popular in medical school as a tool to assist research students with their studies and promote deep learning. Postgraduate learners can exercise their higher-order thinking and cognitive abilities by researching the problems with undergraduate medical student supervision. Thus, encourages self-motivation while as a postgraduate researcher and fosters adult learning, accepting responsibility for one's own development, and adult learning.
Article visualizations:
Referències
Airasian, P. W., & Madaus, G. F. (1972). Functional types of student evaluation. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 4(4), 221-233.
Assessment (2015). Retrieved from https://www.edglossary.org/assessment/
Baranek, L. K. (1996) The Effect of Rewards and Motivation on Student Achievement, Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1292&context=theses
Boud, D., & Brew, A. (1995). Developing a typology for learner self-assessment practices. Research and development in Higher Education, 18(1), 130-135.
Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in higher education, 24(3), 291-301.
Coates, H. (2010). Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1-17.
European Universities Association. (2010). Salzburg II Recommendations: European Universities' Achievements Since 2005 in Implementing the Salzburg Principles. Available from: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/salzburg%20ii%20recommendations%202010.pdf.
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282-284.
Frederiksen J. R., Collins A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational researcher. 18(9)
Duncan, H. and Bell C. (1986). Evaluating and Assessing for Learning. London, Kogan Page, 179 p. ISBN O-85038-991-7. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Evaluating-and-Assessing-for-Learning/Bell-Chris-Harris-Duncan/p/book/9780749413019
Hasgall, A., Saenen, B., Borrell-Damian, L., Van Deynze, F., Seeber, M., & Huisman, J. (2019). Doctoral education in Europe today: approaches and institutional structures. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED593482
Kofi, Dickson & Ocansey, Wiredu & Xu, Zhiwei & Zhang, Xu & Xu, Wenrong & Qian, Hui & Mao, Fei & Kofi Wiredu Ocansey, Dickson. (2021). Current and Emerging Medical Education Teaching Methods - Keeping up with the Evolving Medical Sciences. Revista de Educación (Madrid). 392. 52-104.
Leach, L., Neutze, G., & Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and empowerment: Some critical questions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 293-305.
Meşe, E. & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22.
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational researcher, 18(2), 5-11.
Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability?. Educational researcher, 23(2), 5-12.
Nwosu, I. A., Ohuruogu, B., Ekpechu, J. O. A., Okoronkwo, E., Chukwu, C. O., Obi, C. F., & Ofoegbu, F. C. (2021). Structured Supervision Propelling Job Performance in Universities: Achieving Goals without Chains. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211050375
Orer H. S., Sulaieva O. N. (2017). ORPHEUS institutional survey on responsible research, proceedings of twelfth ORPHEUS conference: PhD training in health sciences and biomedicine from the interdisciplinary perspective, Faculty of Health Sciences, Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania, p. 23.
ORPHEUS/AMSE. (2019). Best Practices for PhD Training 2nd Version. Available from: http://orpheusmed.org/images/stories/documents/ORPHEUS%20Best%20Practices%20DOCUMENT%202016.pdf.
ORPHEUS 2024 Conference, 18-20 April 2024 in Tbilisi, URL: www.orpheus-med.org.
Shepard L. A. Chapter 9: Evaluating test validity. Review of research in education. 1993 Jan;19(1):405-50.
Taylor, C. (1994). Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large-scale assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 231-262.
The Graduate Assembly. (2014). Graduate student happiness & well-being report 2014. Available from: http://ga.berkeley.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/Well-Being-Report-Deck.pdf
University of Oldenburg, Steering Committee - Lehramt International, Publication Year:2024 URL: https://uol.de/en/lehramtinternational/steering-committee
Walton, H. (1997). Small group methods in medical teaching. Medical education, 31(6), 459-464.
Wilcox C. (2014). Lighting dark: Fixing academia's mental health problem. Available from: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26365-lighting-dark-fixing-academias-mental-health-problem/#ixzz6BYY5TCGh
Woolston, C. (2017). Graduate survey: A love–hurt relationship. Nature, 550(7677), 549-552.
Descàrregues
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


