TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i7.6823Paraules clau:
artificial intelligence (AI), writing abilities, English majors, phenomenologyResum
With the rapid advancement of technology, significant transformations are occurring in education, one of the most notable being the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). AI enables computer systems to perform human-like tasks, offering opportunities such as personalised learning experiences, closer monitoring of student progress, and data-driven insights for educational institutions. Through these capabilities, instruction can be adapted to individual needs, and learning gaps can be identified and addressed at early stages. However, alongside these advantages, the use of AI in education also raises concerns related to infrastructure limitations, data security, and the diminishing role of human interaction. Therefore, the integration of AI presents both opportunities and challenges that must be carefully balanced. A forward-looking approach requires not only strengthening technological infrastructure but also addressing the needs of teachers and students in a comprehensive manner to ensure quality and equity in education.This study aims to examine teachers’ views on the use of AI in education. Designed as a qualitative case study, the research was conducted with 10 teachers. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers and analysed using content analysis. The findings indicate that teachers’ perspectives on AI use are multifaceted. While AI is seen as a tool that supports teaching, facilitates assessment and content development, reduces workload, and enhances student engagement, concerns have also been raised regarding the quality of learning. Teachers emphasised that reliance on ready-made information, weakening of critical thinking skills, and loss of originality may negatively affect learning processes. In addition, issues such as data security, unclear usage boundaries, and inequalities in access reveal the ethical and managerial aspects of AI use. Moreover, the findings show that AI is reshaping the teaching profession. Teachers are moving from knowledge transmission to a guiding role; however, this shift also brings feelings of professional inadequacy and a need for support. Overall, the effective use of AI in education requires a planned and guiding approach that preserves instructional benefits, manages risks related to learning quality, upholds ethical principles, and ensures equitable access.Referències
Ahmad, S. F., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M. S., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and its role in education. Sustainability, 13(22), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902
Akyel, Y., & Tur, E. (2024). Eğitim bilimlerinde yapay zekânın potansiyeli ve beklentiler, zorluklar ve gelecek yönelimleri. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 645–711. https://doi.org/10.26677/tr1010.2024.1397
Alanoğlu, M., & Karabatak, S. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zekâ. In F. Güçlü Yılmaz & M. Naillioğlu Kaymak (Eds.), Eğitim araştırmaları-2020 (175–182). Eyuder Yayınları. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349312137_Egitimde_yapay_zeka
Altun, E. (2024). Yapay zekâ ve pedagoji: Eğitimde fırsatlar ve zorluklar. Dijital Teknolojiler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 3(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12637335
Arıkan, A. (2025). Yapay zekâ destekli etkinliklerin sosyal bilgiler dersinde öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, eleştirel düşünme ve inovasyon becerilerine etkisi. Anadolu Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(4), 917–950. https://doi.org/10.63556/ankad.v9i4.269
Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zekâ ve uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71–88. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/baebd/article/690058
Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Nesta. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
Bayraktar, B., Gülderen, S., Akça, S., & Serin, E. (2023). Yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin eğitimde kullanımına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 3(11), 2012–2019. Retrieved from https://uleder.com/index.php/uleder/article/view/380
Bryant, J., Heitz, C., Sanghvi, S., & Wagle, D. (2020). How artificial intelligence will impact K–12 teachers. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/how-artificial-intelligence-will-impact-k-12-teachers
Boztepe, C. (2025). Eğitimde yapay zekâ uygulamaları: Fırsatlar, sınırlılıklar ve etik tartışmalar. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 98–121. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/debder/article/1706141
Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Holloway, C., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence alone will not democratise education: On educational inequality, AI and learning analytics. Sustainability Volume 16, Issue 2, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020781
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (4. baskı). Pegem Akademi. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
Coşkun, F.,ve Güleroğlu, H. D. (2021). Yapay zekânın tarih içindeki gelişimi ve eğitimde kullanılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(3), 947–966. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auebfd/article/916220
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/dberspeakers/article/1047/&path_info=2013_11_14_ALL_Steps_in_Conducting_Mixed_Methods_Research_Creswell.pdf
Hasanov, A., Laine, T. H., & Chung, T. S. (2019). A survey of adaptive context-aware learning environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 11(5), 403-428. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-190534
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332180327_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education_Promise_and_Implications_for_Teaching_and_Learning
Holstein, K., & Doroudi, S. (2021). Equity and artificial intelligence in education: will" aied" amplify or alleviate inequities in education?. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.12920
How, M. L., & Hung, W. L. D. (2019). Educing AI-thinking in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 184-192. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030184?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
İşler, B., ve Kılıç, M. (2021). Eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanimi ve gelişimi. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 5(1), 1-11. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ejnm/article/738221
Lin, C.-C., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Lu, O. H. T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 41-48. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books?id=2oA9aWlNeooC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., & Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education during the digital era. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 1(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4160798
Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press. Retrieved from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10178695/1/Machine%20Learning%20and%20Human%20Intelligence.pdf
McCarthy, J. (2007). What is artificial intelligence? Stanford University. Retrieved from https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&redir_esc=y
Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 18(2), 34-35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054
Özer, S., Akgül, S., & Yıldırım, A. (2023). Okullarda yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 3(10), 1776-1794. Retrieved from https://uleder.com/index.php/uleder/article/view/360
Özyanık, Ç. (2023). Yapay zekâ eğitiminde fiziksel programlamanın etkisi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü). Retrieved from https://avesis.yildiz.edu.tr/yonetilen-tez/4d90b7ce-3ce1-4dee-aa96-87bbfc317ca1/yapay-zeka-egitiminde-fiziksel-programlamanin-etkisi
Pedró, F. (2020). Applications of Artificial Intelligence to higher education: possibilities, evidence, and challenges. IUL Research, 1(1), 61-76. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.57568/iulres.v1i1.43
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Artificial_Intelligence.html?id=8jZBksh-bUMC&redir_esc=y
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Somyürek, S. (2009). Uyarlanabilir öğrenme ortamları: Eğitsel hiper ortam tasarımında yeni bir paradigma. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(1), 29-38. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/5800989/Uyarlanabilir_%C3%96%C4%9Frenme_Ortamlari_E%C4%9Fitsel_Hiper_Ortam_Tasariminda_Yeni_Bir_Paradigma
Syed, A. B., & Zoga, A. C. (2018). Artificial intelligence in radiology: Current technology and future directions. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 22(5), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673383
Turgut, K. (2024). Yapay zekânın yüksek öğretimde sosyal bilim öğretimine entegrasyonu. AUSBD (Yapay Zekâ ve Sosyal Bilimler Öğretimi Özel Sayısı), 1–7. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/usdad/article/1542914
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/63326
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study methods: design and methods (4. Baskı). Thousand Oaks: Sage Pbc. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Case_Study_Research.html?id=OgyqBAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Zhao, Y., & Liu, G. (2018). How do teachers face educational changes in the artificial intelligence era? In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Education Reform and Social Sciences (ERSS 2018) (47–52). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/erss-18.2019.9
Descàrregues
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


