EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, SMART LEARNING TOOLS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SYSTEMS ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING MOTIVATION AMONG ARAB UNIVERSITY STUDENTS FROM EAST JERUSALEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i7.6887Paraules clau:
digital technologies, smart learning tools, administrative support systems, learning motivation, English language learning, East JerusalemResum
This study investigated Arab university students’ evaluations of the impact of digital technologies, smart learning tools, and administrative support systems on English language learning motivation in universities in East Jerusalem. A mixed-methods approach was employed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. The quantitative component adopted a descriptive-correlational design and involved a stratified random sample of 279 university students who completed a validated questionnaire. The qualitative component consisted of semi-structured interviews with selected students to explore their experiences with technology-enhanced English learning. The findings revealed that students generally perceived digital technologies and smart learning tools as significant contributors to enhancing their motivation to learn English. These technologies increased engagement, improved access to learning resources, supported learner autonomy, and facilitated the development of language skills, particularly vocabulary, writing, speaking, and pronunciation. Administrative support systems were perceived at a moderate level, reflecting their indirect but important role in creating supportive learning environments through technological infrastructure and institutional services. Qualitative findings further highlighted the value of artificial intelligence applications, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google Translate, in providing immediate feedback, improving writing and vocabulary, and encouraging independent learning. However, participants also identified challenges, including unstable internet connectivity and differences in institutional support. Overall, the integration of quantitative and qualitative findings suggests that the effectiveness of digital learning tools depends not only on their availability but also on adequate administrative support and technological infrastructure. The study concludes that strengthening digital learning ecosystems can significantly enhance English language learning motivation among Arab university students in East Jerusalem. It recommends integrating AI-based applications into English language instruction through structured pedagogical practices, improving digital infrastructure, strengthening speaking and pronunciation programs, and providing continuous institutional support to maximize learning outcomes.Referències
Abbas, A., Dollah, S., & Patak, A. A. (2026). Reframing English learning strategies in response to technological shifts among EFL students experiencing a directed motivational current (DMC) in learning ESP. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1715294
Abdelali, H. (2025). Technology integration in EFL education: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions in the Moroccan context. Al Maarifa Journal, 396–407.
Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M. S. (2024). Technology-enhanced language learning in English language education: Performance analysis, core publications, and emerging trends. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2346044
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., . . . Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100197
Maxliyo, B. (2025). Technology as a motivational tool in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 5(11), 643–645.
Maxmud-qizi, B. (2025). The role of technology in enhancing English language learning: A linguistic and pedagogical perspective. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 695–702. Retrieved from https://www.wosjournals.com/index.php/pteconf/article/view/1871
Metwally, A. (2025). Digital technology in EFL education: Students' emotional and cognitive reflections from blackboard discussions. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(9), 1939–1951. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.9.2394
Okumuş, H., Ghorbani, S., & Karatepe, S. (2019). A study on the relationship between financial performance and supply chain in the accepted companies in Borsa Istanbul. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(3), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2018.12.005
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Pawar, N. D. (2024). The role of technology in enhancing English language proficiency among Indian learners. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 11(1), 424–433. Retrieved from https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2401451.pdf
Ramon, A., & Ansari, I. (2022). Education in East Jerusalem 1967–2022. Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for digital competence. European Commission. Retrieved from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Education_and_Technology.html?id=Ip7pDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Serajuddin, M. (2023). Impact of using technology on English language teaching on students’ motivation and engagement at classrooms of Bangladesh. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 10(8), 746–761. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15743.18089
Shao, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). Digital technology and EFL performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1187654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187654
Shao, Y., Wu, J., Li, Y., Lu, Q., & Wang, Z. (2025). The impact of digital technology use on EFL students’ English academic performance: The mediating roles of emotional intelligence and learning engagement. BMC Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02967-8
Sudha, S. (2024). The role of technology in fostering language learning communities: Implications for English language teaching. International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11(2), 49–52. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11iS2-March.7508
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wei, Y. (2022). Toward technology-based education and English as a foreign language motivation: A review of literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870540
Descàrregues
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


