THE ROLE OF L1 PROSODY IN L2 VOWEL DURATION PRODUCTION: EVIDENCE FROM ASIAN LEARNERS OF ENGLISH

Authors

  • Nguyen Van Anh Le University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam
  • Huu Thanh Minh Nguyen University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam
  • Hoang My Thieu University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i6.5364

Keywords:

voiced/voiceless stops, preceding vowel duration, L2 English, Asian languages

Abstract

The pre-fortis clipping pattern refers to vowels being shorter before voiceless consonants compared to vowels before voiced consonants. This study examined whether first-language (L1) prosodic properties affect the production of this vowel duration pattern in second-language (L2) English speech. Native speakers of Mandarin Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese with varying English proficiency participated in a production experiment. Results showed that while speakers exhibited some pre-fortis clipping, there were no significant vowel lengthening patterns. Additional analysis revealed subtle differences based on the L1 prosody type. Native Mandarin and Vietnamese speakers, with lexical tone, had similar duration ratios. However, native Korean speakers, with no tone, showed less distinction in vowel duration by consonant voicing. Japanese speakers, with pitch accents, fell in the middle. The findings provide limited evidence that L1 prosody affects L2 vowel duration production. The results have implications for theories of L2 speech acquisition as well as pedagogical techniques when teaching English vowels.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biographies

  • Nguyen Van Anh Le, University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam

    Nguyen Van Anh Le, Lecturer, Faculty of English, University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam. Areas of interest: phonetics, phonology.

    Email: lnvanh@ufl.udn.vn

  • Huu Thanh Minh Nguyen, University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam

    Huu Thanh Minh Nguyen, Lecturer, Faculty of English, University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam. Areas of interest: language testing and assessment, second language writing.

    Email: nhtminh@ufl.udn.vn

  • Hoang My Thieu, University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam

    Hoang My Thieu, University Lecturer, Faculty of English, University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang, Vietnam. Areas of interest: language assessment, second language acquisition.

    Email: thmy@ufl.udn.vn

References

Arnfast, J. S., & Lindgren, M. (1979). Pre-fortis clipping: Acoustic evidence from Swedish. Phonetica, 36(4), 253–256. doi:10.1159/000259939

Bohn, O. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279–304). York Press.

Chen, M. Y. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–159. doi:10.1159/000259312

Eadie, T. L., & Doyle, P. C. (2002). Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. Journal of Voice, 16(1), 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00078-2

Elsendoorn, B. A. G. (1982). English intonation: From theory to practice. Noordhoff International Publishing.

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277).

Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 101, 131.

Flege, J. E., & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24(2), 125–146. doi:10.1177/002383098102400202

Fintoft, K. (1961). Acoustical analysis and perception of tone in some Norwegian dialects. University of Oslo. UiO Brage.

Gandour, J. (1981). Perceptual dimensions of tone: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 9(1), 20–36.

House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(1), 105–113. doi:10.1121/1.1907245

Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267–3278. doi:10.1121/1.2062307

Keating, P. A. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 286–319. doi:10.2307/413643

Kehoe, M., Stoel-Gammon, C., & Buder, E. H. (1995). Acoustic correlates of stress in young children’s speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38(2), 338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3802.338

Klatt, D. H. (1973). Interaction between two factors that influence vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(4), 1102–1104. doi:10.1121/1.1914426

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67. doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799

Payne, E., Post, B., Astruc, L., Prieto, P., & Vanrell, M. D. (2012). Measuring child rhythm. Language and speech, 55(2), 203–229. doi:10.1177/0023830911417695

Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. Newbury House Publishers.

Sim, M. Y. (1969). Vowel duration in relation to stop consonant and vowel quality of Korean. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 89(4), 697–701. doi:10.2307/596428

Umeda, N. (1977). Consonant duration in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(3), 846–858. doi:10.1121/1.381428

Wang, C. (1995). Tense and lax stops in Korean. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2, 388–391.

Wayland, R., & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 113–129. doi:10.1017/S014271640300006X

Wenk, B. J., & Wioland, F. (1982). Is French really syllable-timed? Journal of Phonetics.

Zimmerman, S. A., & Sapon, S. M. (1958). Note on vowel duration seen cross-linguistically. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30(2), 152–153. doi:10.1121/1.1909553

Downloads

Published

2024-05-13

Issue

Section

Articles