THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AMONG BACHELORS’ DEGREE PIANO BEGINNERS IN GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i5.6626Keywords:
cooperative learning, student motivation, piano education, music pedagogy, undergraduate students, ChinaAbstract
This study investigated the impact of cooperative learning strategies on students’ motivation among beginner piano students enrolled in bachelor’s degree programs in Guangdong Province, China. Using a cluster-randomized quasi-experimental design, the research compared four groups: two control groups receiving traditional instruction, an experimental group using Reciprocal Peer Tutoring (RPT) with Jigsaw II, and another using RPT with Teams-Games-Tournament (TGT). A total of 64 students participated and were assessed the effect of cooperative learning strategies on students’ motivation (attitude, autonomy, and social relatedness). Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) revealed a statistically significant main effect of instructional group on learning motivation (Wilks’ Λ = 0.726, F(12, 309.80) = 3.32, p < .001, partial η² = .101). Follow-up univariate ANOVAs showed significant group differences in overall motivation (F(3, 120) = 8.04, p < .001, η² = .167). In particular, the RPT-Jigsaw II group consistently achieved the highest scores across all dependent variables. These findings suggest that cooperative learning strategies enhance the motivational outcomes in early music education. The results support the implementation of structured, peer-based instructional models to increase engagement and foster a more supportive learning environment among novice piano learners. The main contribution of this study lies in demonstrating that structured cooperative learning methods significantly enhance the motivational engagement of beginner piano students, offering a viable pedagogical alternative to traditional instruction in higher music education.References
Biasutti, M., & Concina, E. (2023). Collaborative learning in instrumental music education: Effects on students’ engagement and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122334
Burnard, P., & Murphy, R. (2022). Developing collaborative creativity in music education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101015
Cavitt, M. E. (2022). Student motivation and engagement in music ensembles: Implications for music educators. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294221088921
Cavitt, M. E. (2022). Student motivation and engagement in music ensembles: Implications for music educators. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294221088921
Creech, A., Hallam, S., Varvarigou, M., & McQueen, H. (2022). Active music-making and collaborative learning in higher education. International Journal of Music Education, 40(3), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221084180
Evans, P., & Liu, S. (2023). Student engagement and motivation in music learning environments: Implications for classroom practice. Research Studies in Music Education, 45(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X221137991
Fredriksson, K., & Ferm Thorgersen, C. (2024). Teaching and learning in music education: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on teachers’ support of students’ musical learning. Music Education Research, 26(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2024.2319579
Fredriksson, K., & Ferm Thorgersen, C. (2024). Teaching and learning in music education: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on teachers’ support of students’ musical learning. Music Education Research, 26(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2024.2319579
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 85–118. Retrieved from http://static.pseupdate.mior.ca.s3.amazonaws.com/media/links/Cooperative_learn_validated_theory.pdf
Kiss, B. (2025). Students’ motivation for classroom music: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 15(7), 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070862
Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Pike, P. D. (2017). Dynamic group-piano teaching: Transforming group theory into teaching practice. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Dynamic-Group-Piano-Teaching-Transforming-Group-Theory-into-Teaching-Practice/Pike/p/book/9781138241435
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sun, B., Rauduvaitė, A., Sun, H., & Yao, Z. (2024). Cooperative learning strategies in music education: Optimization and improvement of learning strategies. Education Sciences, 14(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020211
Zhao, X., & Wong, H. Y. C. (2024). A literature review of cooperative learning in music education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3), 2595–2606. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/22272
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


