ATTITUDES AND ASPIRATIONS TOWARDS SCIENCE: A NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF A CHINESE IMMIGRANT STUDENT STUDYING AT A BRITISH SCHOOL IN SPAIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i8.6807Keywords:
Chinese immigrant student, science education, IGCSE, British school, narrative analysis, self-determination theory, Bourdieu, science capital, migrationAbstract
This article explores how a 16-year-old Chinese immigrant girl, Mei, narrates science education while studying for her IGCSEs at a British school in central Spain. Building on Altunbas et al.’s (2024) framework, the study combines self-determination theory with Bourdieu’s concepts of capital, habitus and field. Three semi-structured interviews were analysed narratively, attending to temporal sequencing, turning points, repeated evaluative language, shifts in agency and tensions within Mei’s account. Her story is organised through a marked contrast between her previous school in China and her present school in Spain. Migration does not erase the earlier achievement habitus, guilt about not studying, fear of losing and an instrumental concern with secure employment continue to shape her relationship with science. At the same time, Mei constructs an emerging autonomous STEM future. A childhood fascination with biology is redirected, for ethical as well as practical reasons, towards mathematics, physics, engineering and renewable energy. Family relatedness strengthens after migration, and her parents support her choices despite limited familiarity with the British system. The analysis shows that high competence, science capital and science aspirations can coexist with insecure relatedness and a legacy of controlled motivation. The combined framework illuminates how migration reconfigures, rather than simply replaces, the dispositions through which an immigrant student understands school science and future possibility.References
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Clark University Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/handbookofsocial0001murc
Altunbas, H. G., Mulcahy, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2024). A framework for investigating immigrant students’ attitudes towards science, exemplified with data from Turkish families. London Review of Education, 22(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.14
Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds.). (2013). Doing narrative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024992
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290
Avraamidou, L. (2020). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/e/e0/Pierre_Bourdieu_Distinction_A_Social_Critique_of_the_Judgement_of_Taste_1984.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. Retrieved from https://home.iitk.ac.in/~amman/soc748/bourdieu_forms_of_capital.pdf
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books?id=r50gHwAACAAJ&printsec=copyright&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 416–436). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
Erel, U. (2010). Migrating cultural capital: Bourdieu in migration studies. Sociology, 44(4), 642–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510369363
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Belief_Attitude_Intention_and_Behavior.html?id=8o0QAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76(1), 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44072586
Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2013). What sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK survey. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2979–2998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.681076
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K–12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
Reid, N. (2006). Thoughts on attitude measurement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500485332
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Narrative_Methods_for_the_Human_Sciences.html?id=DfAgxwF0GnQC&redir_esc=y
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Self_Determination_Theory.html?id=th5rDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Salikutluk, Z. (2016). Why do immigrant students aim high? Explaining the aspiration–achievement paradox of immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32(5), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw004
Sikora, J., & Pokropek, A. (2021). Immigrant optimism or immigrant pragmatism? Linguistic capital, orientation towards science and occupational expectations of adolescent immigrants. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 9, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00101-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


