LABOR CURRICULUM REFORM AND LABOR LITERACY DEVELOPMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY BASED ON THE THREE-WIDE EDUCATION FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i8.6949Keywords:
Three-wide Education, labor education, curriculum reform, labor literacy, value-added evaluationAbstract
The curriculum-based development of labor education in higher education requires a shift from general task-based arrangements to more systematic practice-oriented pedagogical design. Drawing on the Three-wide Education Framework, this study redesigned a university labor curriculum and evaluated its effectiveness using a pretest–posttest control-group quasi-experimental design. The study involved 270 valid student participants from three undergraduate programs—administrative management, e-commerce, and biology education—with 135 students in the experimental group and 135 in the control group. The experimental group received a reformed course that integrated optimized learning objectives, reconstructed practice tasks, strengthened reflection and feedback, and diversified assessment, whereas the control group followed conventional instruction. The results showed that the two groups were comparable in labor literacy before the intervention. After the course, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group in both posttest scores and value-added scores across four dimensions: labor cognition, labor competence, labor habits, and labor responsibility. The findings provide empirical evidence for the design of labor education curricula, practice-oriented course reform, and student development assessment in higher education. The study also demonstrates the value of combining pretest-posttest comparison with value-added analysis in evaluating practice-oriented curriculum reform.References
Alt D, Naamati-Schneider L, Weishut DJN, 2023. Competency-based learning and formative assessment feedback as precursors of college students’ soft skills acquisition. Studies in Higher Education 48(12): 1901-1917. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203
Ashwin P, 2025. Transformational accounts of students’ undergraduate education are evoked by their engagement with knowledge. Higher Education 90(2): 479-495. doi: 10.1007/s10734-024-01332-9
Banihashem SK, Noroozi O, van Ginkel S, Macfadyen LP, Biemans HJA, 2022. A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review 37: 100489. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489
Björck V, 2021. Taking issue with how the work-integrated learning discourse ascribes a dualistic meaning to graduate employability. Higher Education 82(2): 307-322. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00650-y
Gao X, Noroozi O, Gulikers JTM, Biemans HJA, Banihashem SK, 2024. A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review 42: 100588. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588
Gordon CS, Pink MA, Rosing H, Mizzi S, 2022. A systematic meta-analysis and meta-synthesis of the impact of service-learning programs on university students’ empathy. Educational Research Review 37: 100490. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100490
Jackson D, Bridgstock R, 2021. What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work. Higher Education 81(4): 723-739. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00570-x
Keller MV, Dresel M, Daumiller M, 2024. Do achievement goals and self-efficacy matter for feedback use? Learning and Instruction 93: 101948. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101948
Kozanitis A, Nenciovici L, 2023. Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis. Higher Education 86(6): 1377-1394. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8
Levinsson H, Nilsson A, Mårtensson K, Persson SD, 2024. Course design as a stronger predictor of student evaluation of quality and student engagement than teacher ratings. Higher Education 88(5): 1997-2013. doi: 10.1007/s10734-024-01197-y
Li B, Lu S, 2023. Labor education, cash transfers and student development: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis 87: 102565. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102565
Martínez-Heredia N, Corral-Robles S, González-Gijón G, Sánchez-Martín M, 2022. Exploring inequality through service learning in higher education: A bibliometric review study. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 826341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826341
Morris R, Perry T, Wardle L, 2021. Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education 9(3): e3292. doi: 10.1002/rev3.3292
OECD, 2025. Education at a glance 2025: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/1c0d9c79-en
Salas-Pilco SZ, Yang Y, Zhang Z, 2022. Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology 53(3): 593-619. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13190
Schluer J, Brück-Hübner A, 2025. Diversity of pedagogical feedback designs: Results from a scoping review of feedback research in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 50(2): 295-307. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2024.2378336
Seo K, Dodson S, Harandi NM, Roberson N, Fels S, Roll I, 2021. Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education 165: 104132. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132
Theobald M, 2021. Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology 66: 101976. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976
World Economic Forum, 2025. The future of jobs report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/. Accessed 13 August 2026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


