INFLUENCE OF INFRASTRUCTURAL FACTORS ON ONLINE LEARNING AMONG UPGRADING NURSING STUDENTS IN A RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED UNIVERSITY SETTING IN KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i10.7038Keywords:
customer focus, meeting customer requirements, student satisfaction, examinations management, SERVQUALAbstract
Although digital learning offers flexibility and improved access to higher education, particularly for upgrading nursing students, its effectiveness largely depends on the availability of adequate infrastructural resources. This study examined the influence of infrastructural factors on online learning among upgrading nursing students at Kenya Methodist University, Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional research design using a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected from 200 upgrading nursing students selected through probability random sampling using semi-structured questionnaires, while qualitative data were obtained through purposive interviews with four lecturers involved in digital education and one university administrator. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whereas qualitative data were analyzed thematically to complement and explain the quantitative findings. The findings demonstrated that infrastructural factors significantly influenced the quality of online learning among upgrading nursing students. The findings demonstrated significant associations between perceived online learning quality and the availability of computer laboratories (p = 0.008), adequate computers (p < 0.001), stable internet connectivity (p = 0.002), standby generators (p < 0.001), powered lecture rooms (p < 0.001), TV/DVD facilities (p < 0.001), and Smart Boards (p = 0.011). However, ICT accessibility (p = 0.306), ICT policy (p = 0.094), and stable electricity supply (p = 0.162) were not significantly associated with perceived online learning quality. Qualitatively, unreliable internet connectivity, intermittent power supply, limited access to digital devices, and system instability disrupted participation, reduced engagement, and constrained students’ online learning experiences. The study recommends strengthening ICT infrastructure for enhanced quality of online learning.References
Abraham, R. (2021b). Turning constraints into opportunities: online delivery of communication skills simulation sessions to undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspectives in Education, 39(4), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/PIE.V39.I4.8
Boro, S. (2021). Influence of mobile phones on enhancing learner support services for distance education programmes. Journal of Online and Distance Learning, CARI Journals Limited, 1(1), 45-59. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojjodl/v1y2021i1p45-59id637.html
Brugliera, P. (2024). The effectiveness of digital learning platforms in enhancing student engagement and academic performance. Journal of Education Humanities and Social Research 1(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.70088/xq3gy756
Chang, J.J., Hain, A., Dosiou, C., & Gesundheit, N. (2023). Use of the community of inquiry framework to measure student and facilitator perceptions of online flipped classroom compared with online lecture learning in undergraduate medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract. 14, 963-972. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S413201
CUE, (2023). Accredited Universities in Kenya. Commission for University Education
Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., de Villiers, M., Felix, A., Gachago, D., Gokhale, C., Ivala, E., Kramm, A., Marshall, D., Prinsloo, P., Solomon, K., & Wissing, G. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and Covid-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751600000166
Gordon, L., & Cleland, J. A. (2021). Change is never easy: How management theories can help operationalise change in medical education. Medical Education, 55(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14297
Hu J, Xiao W. (2025). What are the influencing factors of online learning engagement? A systematic literature review. Front Psychol. 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1542652.
Hussain, A., Zhiqiang M., Li, M., Jameel, A., Kanwel, S., Ahmad, S., & Ge, B. (2025). The mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on nurses' intentions to adopt advanced technology. BMC Nurs. 24(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02648-8
JISC. (2019). JISC Digital Experience Insights Survey 2019 – Media and Learning. Retrieved from https://media-and-learning.eu/type/book-reviews/jisc-digital-experience-insights-survey-2019/
Kashorda, M., & Waema, T. (2014). E-readiness survey of Kenyan universities (2013 report). Kenya Education Network (KENET). Retrieved from https://www.kenet.or.ke/sites/default/files/E-readiness%202013%20Survey%20of%20Kenyan%20Universities_FINAL.pdf
Katumbi, M.N., & Magutu, O.C. (2018). Challenges of accessing electricity for ICT Use in Kenyan secondary schools: a case of Nandi County. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN). 8(8), 11-16. Retrieved from https://www.iosrjen.org/Papers/vol8_issue8/Version-6/C0808061116.pdf
Kenya Methodist University. (2024). University profile. Meru, Kenya: Kenya Methodist University.
Kibuku, R.N., Ochieng, D.O., Wausi, A. (2020). e Learning Challenges Faced by Universities in Kenya: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.004
Marikyan, D. & Papagiannidis, S. (2026). Technology Acceptance Model: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed.), Theory Hub Book. Retrieved from https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/302879
Mutisya, D. N. & Makokha, G.L. (2016). Status of E-Learning in Public Universities in Kenya. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 341-359. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2235
Sebuliba, F. (2021). Degree completion nursing students’ readiness to learn in the online environment in Uganda. Texila International Journal of Nursing. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJNR.2015.07.02.ART007
Sundler, A. J., Björk, M., Bisholt, B., Ohlsson, U., Engström, A. K., & Gustafsson, M. (2014). Student nurses’ experiences of the clinical learning environment in relation to the organization of supervision: A questionnaire survey. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.023
Ullah, H., Ali, J., & Naz, A. (2014). Gender representation in children's books: A critical review of empirical studies. World Applied Sciences Journal, 29(1), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.29.01.13831
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology
World Bank. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/state-of-global-learning-poverty
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


