STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE OF INTEGRATION OF GEOGEBRA IN LEARNING MATHEMATICS IN LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN UGANDA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i11.5583Parole chiave:
GeoGebra, integration, students’ knowledge, Mathematics learning, secondary schoolAbstract
The use of technology in the pedagogical process is growing at a phenomenal rate and has revolutionized the way students learn. As a result, there is a need for integrating technology into students’ mathematical activities. GeoGebra is a technology software that supports teaching and learning mathematics, especially geometry, algebra, and statistics. This study investigated the students’ knowledge of the integration of GeoGebra in learning mathematics in lower secondary schools in Wakiso District, Uganda. The study utilized quasi-experimental and cross-sectional designs with 42 senior two students in the experimental and 43 in the control group. Data were collected using pre-tests, post-tests, and questionnaires to identify the students’ difficult geometric concepts when learning mathematics, establish the impact of GeoGebra-based training on the students’ learning, and examine the relationship between students’ perceived ease of use of GeoGebra and its integration in learning mathematics. Independent samples t-test, Pearson's linear correlation, and descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, percentages, and frequencies were employed to analyze the data. The study revealed that reflection on the Cartesian plane was the most abstract geometric concept to learn. The results further revealed a statistically significant mean difference between pre-test and post-test scores in favour of the experimental group after the intervention. Furthermore, a moderately significant positive linear correlation existed between students’ perceived ease of use of GeoGebra and its integration in learning reflection on the Cartesian plane. Therefore, the study recommends urgently training students to incorporate this interactive educational software into their mathematics learning.
Article visualizations:
Riferimenti bibliografici
Amin, M. E. (2005). Social Science Research Concepts, Methodology, and Analysis. Kampala: Makerere University Press. Retrieved from https://search.worldcat.org/title/Social-science-research-:-conception-methodology-and-analysis/oclc/157025594
Andema, S., Kendrick, M. & Norton, B. (2013). Digital literacy in Ugandan teacher education: Insights from a case study, Reading & Writing 4(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/rw.v4i1.27
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from https://www.scienceopen.com/book?vid=c20c4174-d8dc-428d-b352-280b05eacdf7
Awaji, B. (2022). Students ‘perceptions of using GeoGebra software in mathematics learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 7(2). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v7i2.4509
Azucena, L. J. R., Gacayan, P. J. L., Tabat, M. A. S., Cuanan, K. H., & Pentang, J. (2022). GeoGebra intervention: How have students’ performance and confidence in Algebra advanced? Studies in Technology and Education,1(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v1i1.17
Barut, M. E. O & Retnawati, H. (2020). Geometry learning in vocational high school: Investigating students’ difficulties and levels of thinking. Ahmad Dahlan International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education, Journal of Physics: conference series pp 1-11. Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012058
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Retrieved from https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
Creswell W. J., Klassen A. C., Clark V. L. P. & Smith K. C. (2011). Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health, 2011, pp. 39. Retrieved from https://obssr.od.nih.gov/sites/obssr/files/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research.pdf
Dahal, N., Shrestha, D., & Pant, B.P (2019). Integration of GeoGebra in teaching and learning geometric transformation, Journal of Mathematics and Statistical Science, 5(1), 323-332. Retrieved from http://www.ss-pub.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/JMSS19082102.pdf
Dahal, N., Pant, B. P., Shrestha, I. M., & Manandhar, N. K. (2022a). Use of GeoGebra in teaching and learning geometric transformation in school mathematics. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16(08), pp. 65–78. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i08.29575
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 928–1003. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Downing, S. M. (2004). Reliability: On the Reproducibility of Assessment Data. Med Education, 38, 1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01932.x
Fabiyi, T. R. (2017). Geometry concepts in Mathematics perceived as difficult to learn by senior secondary school students in Ekiti state, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(1), 83–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701018390
Farrell, G. (2007). ICT in Education in Uganda. Survey of ICT and Education in Africa. Uganda country report. Pp 1-15. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/zh/424221468318290457/pdf/456800BRI0Box31da010ICTed0Survey111.pdf
García-Valcárcel, A. M. R., & Tejedor, F. J. (2009) Information and communication technologies in university teaching: Implications in European higher education space. International Journal of Human Sciences 6(2), 684-696. Retrieved from https://arastirmax.com/en/publication/uluslararasi-insan-bilimleri-dergisi/6/2/information-and-communication-technologies-university-teaching-implications-european-higher-education-space/arid/3cdbaeb8-fb21
Guloba, M. M., & Atwine, B. (2021). Digital technologies uptake is still low in Ugandan secondary and tertiary institutions, Economic Policy Research Center, policy brief no. 142. Retrieved from https://eprcug.org/publication/digital-technologies-uptake-is-still-low-in-ugandan-secondary-and-tertiary-institutions/
Habibu, T., Abdullah-Al-Mamun, M. D., Clement, C. (2012). Difficulties Faced by Teachers in Using ICT in Teaching-Learning at Technical and Higher Educational Institutions of Uganda, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) 1 (7). pp 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281349386_Difficulties_Faced_by_Teachers_in_Using_ICT_in_Teaching-Learning_at_Technical_and_Higher_Educational_Institutions_of_Uganda
Hohenwarter, M., & Jones, K. (2007). Ways of linking geometry and algebra: The case of GeoGebra. British Society for Research. BSRLM Geometry Working Group. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/50742
Hohenwarter, M., & Karl Fuch, K. (2004). Combination of dynamic geometry, algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra. ZDM classification: R 20, U 70 Accessed at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228398347
Hohenwarter, M., Jarvis, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2008). Linking geometry, algebra, and mathematics teachers: GeoGebra software and the establishment of the international GeoGebra institute. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 83-86. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307936818_Linking_geometry_algebra_and_mathematics_teachers_GeoGebra_software_and_the_establishment_of_the_International_GeoGebra_Institute
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (4), pp. 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576
Horzum, T., & Unlu, M. (2017). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers' Views about GeoGebra and Its Use. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(3), 77-90. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/adn.10.3.8
Ibibo, C. O. G., & Tubona, G. (2019). Student’s perception and performance across ability levels on GeoGebra software usage in learning of circle geometry. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 4(4), 7-11. Retrieved from https://www.mathsjournal.com/pdf/2019/vol4issue4/PartA/4-3-13-566.pdf
Juman, Z. A. M., Mathavan, M., Ambegedara, A. S., & Udagedara, I. G. K. (2022). Difficulties in Learning Geometry Component in Mathematics and Active-Based Learning Methods to Overcome the Difficulties. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(2), pp. 41–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i2.4299
Madan, C. R., & Kensinger, E. A. (2017). Test–Retest Reliability of Brain Morphology Estimates. Brain Informatics, 4, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs40708-016-0060-4
Mikael, S & Asa, H. (2019). How Skillful Teachers enable Success in their Teaching with Respect to Inclusion and Knowledge Development. A qualitative study Based on Teachers’ Experiences of Successful Teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Education 7(2). Pp. 35-52. Retrieved from https://www.eurrec.org/ijote-article-21939
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6), 1017–1054. Retrieved from https://one2oneheights.pbworks.com/f/MISHRA_PUNYA.pdf
Muweesi, C., Lou Shizhou, Nakonde, J, Salome, J. K., Tomusange, R., & Sserwadda, L. (2021). Discourses in ICT integration: Pedagogical orientations in selected city primary schools in Uganda. 16(5), pp. 172-180, http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.4103
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) in 2000, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (PSSM) 75 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principles_and_Standards_for_School_Mathematics#Content_standards
Ngirishi, H., & Bansilal, S. (2019). An Exploration of High school learners’ understanding of Geometric concepts. Problems of Education in the 21st century, 77(1), 82-96, https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.82
Nyakito, C., Amimo, C., & Allida, V. B. (2021). Challenges of integrating information and communication technology in teaching among National Teachers' Colleges in Uganda. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(3), pp. 157-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2021v02i03.011
Ocal, M.F. (2017). The effect of GeoGebra on students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge: The Case of applications of derivative. Higher Education Studies; 7(2), DOI. http://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p67
Orodho, A. J. (2009). Elements of education and social sciences research methods. Kazezia publishers, Nairobi, 2(6), 26-133. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310832267_ELEMENTS_OF_EDUCATION_AND_SOCIAL_SCIENCE_RESEARC
Otieno, O. H., Owiti, D. S., & Wanjala, M. M. (2017). GeoGebra instruction software and its effect on students’ achievement in mathematics in secondary schools of Kakamega County, Kenya, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations 5(4), pp 82-88. Retrieved from https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/geogebra-instruction-software-and-its-effect-on-students-achievement-in-mathematics-in-secondary-schools-of-kakamega-county-kenya
Owusu, R., Bonyah, E., & Arthur, D.Y. (2023). The Effect of GeoGebra on University students’ understanding of polar coordinates, Cogent Education, 10(1), 2177050, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2177050. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2177050
Rajagopal, S., Ismail, Z., Ali, M., & Sulaiman, N. (2015). Attitude of secondary students towards the use of GeoGebra in learning loci in two dimensions. International Education Studies; 8(13), pp 27-32. DOI. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p27
Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Arlinwibowo, J., Wulandari, N. F., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Teachers’ difficulties in implementing thematic teaching and learning in elementary schools. New Educational Review, 48(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.48.2.16
Seloraji, P., & Eu. L. K. (2017). Students’ Performance in Geometrical Reflection Using GeoGebra. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5 (1), pp 65-77. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312022682_Students'_Performance_in_Geometrical_Reflection_Using_GeoGebra
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
Tamam, B; & Dasari, D. (2021). The use of GeoGebra software in teaching mathematics. Journal of Physics, 1882, Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012042
Tilden, V. P, Nelson, C. A, & May, B.A. (1990). Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nursing Research. 39(3):172-5. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2342905/
The National ICT policy (2014). The Republic of Uganda. Ministry of ICT, Kampala.
Ubi, E.E., Odiong, A.U., & Igiri, I.O. (2018). Geometry Viewed as a Difficult Mathematics. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 3 (11), 251-255. Retrieved from https://ijisrt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/IJISRT18NV72.pdf
White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental design and methods: Methodological Briefs, Impact Evaluation 8. UNICEF Office of Research, Florence
Zengin, Y., & Tatar, E. (2017). Integrating Dynamic Mathematics Software into Cooperative Learning Environments in Mathematics. Educational Technology & Society, 20 (2), 74–88. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317025986_Integrating_dynamic_mathematics_software_into_cooperative_learning_environments_in_mathematics
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
