PASTORAL LIFE IN RURAL MONGOLIA: HERDERS’ EXPERIENCES, CHALLENGES, AND FUTURE ADAPTATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i12.6370Parole chiave:
pastoral life, herder, rural MongoliaAbstract
Pastoralism remains central to Mongolia’s cultural heritage and rural economy, yet herders face mounting pressures from environmental change, demographic shifts, and market instability. This qualitative study explores the lived experiences, challenges, and future perspectives of four herders in western Mongolia, representing different generations and family structures. Data were collected through participant observation and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings reveal that herders value pastoral life for its harmony with nature, emotional fulfillment from livestock, self-sufficiency, and cultural continuity. However, they also confront profound challenges, including climate variability, labor shortages, educational disruptions, health care inaccessibility, and inadequate government support. Participants voiced concern about the declining number of herders and emphasized that sustaining pastoralism will depend on adaptive strategies, intergenerational knowledge transfer, and responsive state policies. The study contributes to understanding how cultural identity, environmental change, and socioeconomic factors intersect in shaping the future of Mongolian pastoralism.
Article visualizations:
Riferimenti bibliografici
Addison, J., Brown, C., Davies, J., Holcombe, S., & Walters, G. (2013). A critical review of rangeland management in Mongolia. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-7136-3-8
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Begzsuren, S., Ellis, J. E., Ojima, D. S., Coughenour, M. B., & Chuluun, T. (2004). Livestock responses to droughts and severe winter weather in the Gobi Three Beauty National Park, Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environments, 59(4), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.02.001
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (1999). Sustaining the steppes: A geographical history of pastoral land use in Mongolia. The Geographical Review, 89(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/216154
Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., & Batbuyan, B. (2004). Law and disorder: Local implementation of Mongolia’s land law. Development and Change, 35(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00345.x
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE. Retrieved from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/research-ethics-for-social-scientists/toc#_
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for semi-structured interview guides. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kreutzmann, H. (2012). Pastoral practices and their transformation in the Karakoram. In H. Kreutzmann (Ed.), Pastoral practices in High Asia (pp. 1–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.3167/082279404780446096
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book/naturalistic-inquiry
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED415771
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Research.html?id=JFN_BwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Miyamae, N. (2003). モンゴルにおける初等教育の諸問題と教育協力の課題 [Issues of primary education and educational cooperation in Mongolia]. Kyushu Kyoiku Gakkai Kenkyu Kiyo, 31, 105–112.
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2392270
Sternberg, T. (2008). Environmental challenges in Mongolia’s dryland pastoral landscape. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(7), 1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.12.016
Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
UNESCO. (2019). Nomadic pastoralism in Mongolia: Intangible cultural heritage and sustainable development. UNESCO Publishing.
Upton, C. (2010). Living off the land: Nature and nomadism in Mongolia. Geoforum, 41(5), 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.06.004
Upton, C. (2012). Managing Mongolia’s commons: Land reforms, social context, and institutional change. Society & Natural Resources, 25(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.565454
Yembuu, B. (2016). Mongolian nomads: Effects of globalization and social change. In K. Ueno, S. Sonoda, & A. Nishimura (Eds.), Everyday knowledge, education and sustainable futures: Transdisciplinary approaches in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 89–105). Singapore: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0216-8_7
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


