EFL LEARNERS’ PERCEPTIONS, MOTIVATION, AND SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING IN STRUCTURED YOUTUBE-BASED SPEAKING PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v10i3.7063Ключевые слова:
YouTube, learner perceptions, motivation, self-directed learning, EFL speaking practiceАннотация
This study explored EFL learners’ perceptions of structured YouTube-based speaking practice and the levels of motivation and self-directed learning they reported after a 12-week program at Tay Do University, Vietnam. Participants were 35 second-year non-English-major Finance and Banking undergraduates who completed the YouTube-based condition. Data came from three six-item questionnaire subscales and semi-structured interviews with 10 purposively selected participants. Questionnaire responses were summarized descriptively, and the interview findings were organized according to the thematic analysis reported in the research. Learners reported positive perceptions (M = 4.06, SD = 0.45) and motivation (M = 3.83, SD = 0.50), while self-directed learning was less strongly endorsed (M = 3.57, SD = 0.47). The three interview themes were structured self-practice routines, perceived gains in pronunciation and fluency, and growing confidence to speak. Participants described repeated viewing, caption use, shadowing, self-recording, and preparation of spoken responses. However, following a prescribed routine did not necessarily mean independently planning and evaluating learning. The findings suggest that favorable attitudes and motivation can coexist with a continuing need for support in self-directed learning. Interpretation is limited by the small, single-institution sample, post-intervention self-report design, and marginal internal consistency of the self-directed learning subscale (α = .69). Gradual transfer of responsibility, explicit self-monitoring support, and further validation of the measure are recommended.Библиографические ссылки
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833767
Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Research_Design.html?id=4uB76IC_pOQC&redir_esc=y
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833750
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Social_Psychology_and_Second_Language_Le.html?id=VcBitAEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Riding the digital wilds: Learner autonomy and informal language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.10125/44667
Ho, T. V., & Le, T. T. (2023). The effects of video materials on English-major students’ learning: A test of hypotheses in the Vietnamese context. FOSTER Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(4), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v3i4.114
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Self_directed_Learning.html?id=ljVZAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Principles_and_Practice_in_Second_Langua.html?id=p9toAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Montero-Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013). Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System, 41(3), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.013
Nguyen, T. N. H. (2026). The effect of YouTube videos on EFL learners’ speaking skills [Master’s thesis, Can Tho University].
Nhat, T. T. M. (2018). Thực trạng kỹ năng nói tiếng Anh và đề xuất một số hoạt động tự rèn luyện nói tiếng Anh ngoài lớp học cho sinh viên chuyên ngành kỹ thuật Trường Đại học Công nghiệp Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 435(1), 54–59.
Purnamasari, A. (2018). What EFL learners say about YouTube use to improve pronunciation in a blended learning environment. Lingua Cultura, 12(3), 233–238. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358043542_What_EFL_Learners_Say_about_YouTube_Use_to_Improve_Pronunciation_in_a_Blended_Learning_Environment
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). Twenty years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154.
Saed, H. A., Haider, A. S., Al-Salman, S., & Hussein, R. F. (2021). The use of YouTube in developing the speaking skills of Jordanian EFL university students. Heliyon, 7(7), Article e07543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07543
Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414885
Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy051
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781315835877-13/communicative-competence-roles-comprehensible-input-comprehensible-output-development-jim-cummins-merrill-swain
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Truong, N. K. V., & Le, Q. T. (2022). Utilizing YouTube to enhance English speaking skills: EFL tertiary students’ practices and perceptions. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(4), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221342
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


