WHAT DOES THE ONLINE CHAT BOX TELL: A MIXED STUDY OF STUDENT PARTICIPATION INDICATED BY ONLINE CHAT DATA AND OTHER VARIABLES IN AN ONLINE ENGLISH COURSE

Författare

  • Qiang Huang School of English Education, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, P. R. of China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v8i3.5072

Nyckelord:

student participation, online chat box, online chat data, learning outcome, teaching performance

Abstract

Student participation is essential to both teaching and learning, especially in the online instruction mode. The present study aims to examine student participation and their relations with other variables such as learning outcome and teaching performance in a university English course online. Participants were 84 sophomores of English Education majors at a university who learned an English course on an online learning platform. Both qualitative data from the chat box of the online learning platform and quantitative data of students’ final scores and their scores of course evaluation were employed. Follow-up semi-structured interviews were also conducted to provide further insights into the findings. Results showed that student participation indicated by the online chat data was extensive and active, with all participants engaged and an average of 112 messages sent per student over the semester in the online English course. Further correlational analyses found that student participation was not significantly correlated with either learning outcome indicated by students’ final scores or teaching performance indicated by their course evaluation scores. However, interview data revealed that online chat boxes had contributed to lower-risk and more active online participation in several ways including attenuating participation apprehension, improving concentration on instruction and building a learning community. Implications of the findings were discussed and suggestions for future research were provided.

 

Författarbiografi

  • Qiang Huang, School of English Education, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, P. R. of China

    Qiang Huang is a university English teacher specializing in linguistics and applied linguistics. Professor Huang takes an interest in both language teaching and research. Her research orientation includes English language teaching and learning, classroom teaching and research, action research, online learning and blended learning, material development and evaluation, language testing as well as teacher education and development.

Referenser

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Changing Courses: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. 1–42. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf/

Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., et al. (2014). Engaging with massive online course. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web, WWW’14, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp, 687-698. New York: ACM.

Araka, E., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., & Oboko, R. (2020). Research trends in measurement and intervention tools for self-regulated learning for e-learning environments—systematic review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15:6.

Cole, A. W., Lennon, L. & Weber, N. (2019). Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15.

Cheng, J. & Lei, J. (2020). A description of students’ commenting behaviours in an online blogging activity. E-Learning and Digital Media, 1-17.

Chou, C. C. & He, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of digital badges on student online contributions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54:8, 1092-1116.

Crosthwaite, P. R., Bailey, D. R. & Meeker, A. (2015). Assessing in-class participation for EFL: considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles. Language Testing in Asia, 5:9, 1-19.

Czekanski, K. E., & Wolf, Z. R. (2013). Encouraging and evaluating class participation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. 10(1), 1-12.

Dallimore, E., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2012). Impact of Cold-Calling on Student Voluntary Participation. Journal of Management Education, 37(3), 305-341.

Dancer, D., & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to

assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 445-454. (ES)

Dewan, M. A. A., Murshed, M. & Lin, F. (2019). Engagement detection in online learning: a review. Smart Learning Environments, 6:1, 1-20.

Fassinger, P. A. (1995). Understanding classroom interaction: Students’ and professors’ contributions to student silence. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 82-96.

Frishy, B. N., Berger, E., Burchett, M., Herovic, E. & Strawser, M. G. (2014). Participation apprehensive students: The influence of Face support and instructor-student rapport on classroom participation. Communication Education, 63:2, 105-123.

Frymier, A., B. & Houser, M. L. (2016) The Role of Oral Participation in Student Engagement. Communication Education, 65:1, 83-104, DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1066019

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98:3, 184–191.

Haniya, S. & Paquette, L. (2020). Understanding learner participation at scale: How and why. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(3), 236—252.

Heaslip, G., Donovan, P. & Cullen, J. G. (2013). Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15:1, 11-24.

Hew, K. F. & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Possible factors influencing Asian students’ degree of participation in peer-facilitated online discussion forums: a case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30:1, 85-104.

Freeman, M., Blayney, P., & Ginns, P. (2006). Anonymity and in-class learning: The case for electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 568-580.

Frishy, B. N., Berger, E., Burchett, M., Herovic, E. & Strawser, M. G. (2014). Participation apprehensive students: The influence of Face support and instructor-student rapport on classroom participation. Communication Education, 63:2, 105-123.

Frymier, A., B. & Houser, M. L. (2016) The Role of Oral Participation in Student Engagement. Communication Education, 65:1, 83-104, DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1066019

Huang, Q. (2019). Comparing teacher’s roles of f2f learning and online learning in a blended English course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019, 32:3, 190-209

Huang, Q. (2022). Classroom Activities, Classroom Anxiety and Teacher Roles: Three Dimensions Revealing Class Reality of a University English Course. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19:2, 431-450.

Huang, Q. (2022). Does learning happen? A mixed study of online chat data as an indicator of student participation in an online English course. Education and Information Technologies, 26;1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10963-3.

Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers and Education, 51:4, 1755–1765.

Khalil, M. & Ebner, M. (2017). Clustering patterns of engagement in massive open online courses (MOOCs): the use of learning analytics to reveal student categories. J Comput High Educ, 29: 114-132.

Kim, M. K., Lee, I, H. & Kim, S. M. (2021). A longitudinal examination of the temporal and iterative relationship among learner engagement dimensions during online discussion. J Comput Educ, 8:1, 63-86.

Kizilcec, RF., Piech, C. and Schneider E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner sub-populations in a massive open online course. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, LAK’13. New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 170-179. New York: ACM.

Latham, A. & Hill, N. S. (2013). Preference for anonymous classroom participation: linking student characteristics and reactions to electronic response systems. Journal of Management Education, 38:2, 192-215.

Liu, C., Yang, C. & Chao, P. (2019). A longitudinal analysis of student participation in a digital collaborative storytelling activity. Education Tech Research Dev, 67:907-929.

Luo, Y., Pan, R. Choi, J. H. & Strobel, J. (2017). Effects of Chronotypes on students’ choice, participation, and performance in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55:8, 1069-1087.

Neer, M. R., & Kircher, W. F. (1989). Apprehensives’ perception of classroom factors influencing their class participation. Communication Research Reports, 6, 70-77.

Ozkara, O, B., & Cakir, H. (2018) Participation in online courses from the students’ perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 26:7, 924-942, DOI:10.1080/10494820.2017.1421562

Peterson, R. M. (2001). Course participation: An active learning approach employing student documentation. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(3). 187-194.

Rocca, K. A. (2010) Student Participation in the College Classroom: An Extended Multidisciplinary Literature Review. Communication Education, 59:2, 185-213, DOI: 10.1080/03634520903505936

Rubio, F., Thomas, M. & Li, Q. (2018). The role of teaching presence and student participation in Spanish blended courses. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 31:3, 226-250.

Sedova, K. (2017) Transforming teacher behaviour to increase student participation in classroom discourse. Teacher Development, 21:2, 225-242, DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2016.1224775.

Shi, M. & Tan, C. Y. (2020). Beyond oral participation: a typology of student engagement in classroom discussions. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55: 247-265.

Stamm, E. J. P., Zafonte, M. & Palenque, S. M. (2017). The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48:6, 1250-1259.

Stephenson, C. R., Bonnes, S. L, Sawatsky, A. P, Richards, L. W, Schleck, C. D., Jayawant N. Mandrekar, J. N., Beckman, T. J & Wittich, C. M. (2020). The relationship between learner engagement and teaching effectiveness: a novel assessment of student engagement in continuing medical education. BMC Medical Education, 20: 403, 1-8.

Tang, X., Wang, Y. & Wong, D. (2020). Learning to be silent: examining Chinese elementary students’ stories about why they do not speak in class. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33:4, 384-401.

Theriault, J. C. (2019). Exploring college students’ classroom participation: a case study of a developmental literacy classroom. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49:3, 206-222.

Tsai, C., Ku, H. & Campbell, A. (2021). Impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning online. Distance Education, 1-20.

Weaver, RR & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 570—601.

Nedladdningar

Publicerad

2023-10-19

Nummer

Vol 8 Nr 3 (2023)

Sektion

Articles

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).