EXAMINING THE ROLE OF ENGAGEMENT IN BLENDED LEARNING AND ITS EFFECTS ON LEARNING OUTCOMES AND SATISFACTION IN CAMEROON HIGHER EDUCATION

Författare

  • Shaibou Abdoulai Haji Faculty of Education, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v8i3.5223

Nyckelord:

blended learning, learning outcomes, learning satisfaction, learning engagement

Abstract

In the context of higher education student learning outcome, and satisfaction was examined using blended learning by analyzing how it influences the underlying learning process, focusing on the role of learning engagement. A structural model was used to explain students' learning outcomes and satisfaction with an experiment involving 210 university students learning using Google Workspace. The experimental data show that the effects of using blended learning are mediated by learning engagement. In particular, interactions using learning management systems positively affect learners' engagement, increasing perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction. Hence, blended learning appears to have significant direct and moderating effects on learning outcomes and satisfaction. These findings have several important implications for blended learning research and practice.

Författarbiografi

  • Shaibou Abdoulai Haji, Faculty of Education, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon

    Position: Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Education, University of Yaoundé I, Cameroon.

    Academic Education: PhD in Education with a focus on Educational Technology.

    Area of Interest: Educational Technology, Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, STEM Education, and Blended Learning.

    Research Interests: Educational Technology, Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, STEM Education, and Blended Learning.

    Academic Networks: ResearchGate, ORCID, Google Scholar.

Referenser

Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 159–174.

Alavi, M., & Gallupe, R. B. (2003). Using information technology in learning: Case studies in business and management education programs. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 139–153.

Al-Huneidi, A. M., & Schreurs, J. (2012). Constructivism-based blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 7, 4–9.

Alonso, F., Manrique, D., Martínez, L., & Vines, J. M. (2011). How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54, 471–478.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? Prior perspectives and future directions. Journal of Management Education, 38, 784–817.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in internet-based MBA courses, Business. Communication Quarterly 63 (4) 9–26.

Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.

Bryant, K., Campbell, J., & Kerr, D. (2003). Impact of web-based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14, 41–50.

Carini, R. ; Kuh, G. & Klein, S. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education 47 1–32.

Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs traditional classroom settings: Assessing the effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. Journal of Educators Online, 4, 1–15.

Chou, A. Y., & Chou, D. C. (2011). Course management systems and blended learning: An innovative learning approach. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9, 463–484.

Cosgrove, S. B., & Olitsky, N. H. (2015). Knowledge retention, student learning, and blended course work: Evidence from principles of economics courses. Southern Economic Journal, 82, 556–579.

Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education, 87, 83–89.

Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in online university education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4, 215–235.

Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50, 491–498.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.

Garrison, D.R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice, Routledge Falmer, London.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing - An Imprint of Wiley.

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14.

Hu, S.; Kuh, G. & Li, S. (2008). The effects of engagement in inquiry-oriented activities on student learning and personal development. Innovative Higher Education 33 (2) 71–81.

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features, and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 746.

Leutner, D. (2014). Motivation and emotion as mediators in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 174–175.

Liaw, S.S.; Huang, H.M. & Chen, G.D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior 23 1906–1920.

Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 14, 1–16.

McDonough, C., Roberts, R. P., & Hummel, J. (2014). Online learning: Outcomes and satisfaction among underprepared students in an upper-level psychology course. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17.

McFarlin, B. K. (2008). Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate exercise physiology course at a large urban university. Advances in Physiology Education, 32, 86–91.

Melton, B. F., Bland, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 3.

Müller, F. A., & Wulf, T. (2020). Technology-supported management education: A systematic review of antecedents of learning effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17.

Napier, N. P., Dekhane, S., & Smith, S. (2011). Transitioning to blended learning: Understanding student and faculty perceptions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15, 20–32.

Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 227–233.

Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., Merí, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomas, M. C., & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Medical Education, 41, 189–195.

Robinson, C.C. & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: student engagement in online learning. The Journal of Education for Business 84 (2) 101–108.

Sauers, D., & Walker, R. C. (2004). A comparison of traditional and technology-assisted instructional methods in the business communication classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 430–442.

Snowball, J. D. (2014). Using interactive content and online activities to accommodate diversity in a large first-year class. Higher Education, 67, 823–838.

Terry, N. (2007). Assessing instruction modes for master of business administration (MBA) courses. The Journal of Education for Business, 82, 220–225.

Webb, H. W., Gill, G., & Poe, G. (2005). Teaching with the case method online: Pure versus hybrid approaches. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3, 223–250.

Nedladdningar

Publicerad

2024-02-21

Nummer

Vol 8 Nr 3 (2023)

Sektion

Articles

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).