INCIDENTAL SIMILARITY AND INFLUENCE OF FOOD PREFERENCES AND JUDGMENT: CHANGING TO BE CLOSER TO SIMILAR PEOPLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejphs.v7i2.176Keywords:
similarity, children, evaluationAbstract
Research has shown that people like more those who have something in common with them and are more likely to comply with a request addressed by similar individuals. We hypothesized that such similarity could also influence people’s preferences. First, 8-9-year- old children were led to believe that they shared the same birthday with an instructor. Afterwards, the children were asked about their food preferences and solicited to taste vegetables they disliked. Two weeks later, a survey was administered and revealed that the children in the incidental similarity condition expressed a higher liking for the vegetable disliked and more vegetable consumption. These changes in their vegetable consumption were confirmed by their mother. We suggest that similarity led participants to change their own attitudes and values to bring them closer to a similar target.References
Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., & Anderson, C. (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 35-43.
Emswiller, T., Deaux, K., & Willits, J. E. (1971). Similarity, sex, and requests for small favors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 284-291.
Finch, J. F., & Cialdini, R. B. (1989). Another direct tactic of (self-) image management: Boosting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 222-232.
Green, P. W., & Giles, H. (1973). Reactions to a stranger as a function of dress style: The tie. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 676.
Guéguen, N. (2015). Similarity and sensitive topics survey: When similarity elicit answers to intimate questions in survey research. Current Psychology, 34, 58-65.
Guéguen, N., Martin, A., & Meineri, S. (2011). Similarity and social interaction: When similarity fosters implicit behavior toward a stranger. Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 671-673.
Guéguen, N., Pichot, N., & Le Dreff, G. (2005). Similarity and helping behavior on the Web: The impact of the convergence of surnames between a solicitor and a solicitee in a request made by e-mail. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 423-429.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Jiang, L., Hoegg, J., Dahl, D. W., Chattopadhyay, A. (2010). The persuasive role of incidental similarity on attitudes and purchase intentions in a sales context. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 778-791
Martin, A., & Guéguen, N. (2013). The influence of incidental similarity on self-revelation in response to an intimate survey. Social Behavior and Personality. 41, 353-356.
Martin, A., Jacob, C., & Guéguen, N. (2013). Similarity facilitates relationships on social networks: A field experiment on Facebook. Psychological Reports, 113, 1-4.
Miller, D. T., Downs, J. S., & Prentice, D. A. (1998). Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit relationship: The social bond between birthdaymates. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 475–81.
Oates, K., & Wilson, M. (2002). Nominal kinship cues facilitate altruism. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, 269, 105-109.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).