RESPONDING TO REQUESTS IN CAMEROON FRENCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v7i1.495Keywords:
communicative act, request responses, (im)politeness, Cameroon FrenchAbstract
The focus of this paper is on request responses by Cameroon French speakers. Data were collected from 81 French-speaking Cameroonian university students. The analysis focused on the types of request responses (preferred, dis-preferred or open-ended) and the types and linguistic realizations of the speech acts (head acts and external modifiers) used to respond to requests. Request response strategies were also examined in terms of rapport management. The results showed that the participants mostly used compliance-responses. It was also found that positive responses to requests were mostly realised using combinations of agreements and/or promises to perform the requested act and external modifiers, while negative responses to requests were realized using combinations of refusals and/or reprimands and external modifiers. The few cases of open-ended responses to requests displayed combinations of aspects of compliance and elements non-compliance responses. The analysis also revealed social variation in the use of the three types of request responses. While the study expands the scope of research on the pragmatics of Cameroon French, it calls for further research on request responses.
References
Anchimbe, E. & Janney, R. (2011). Postcolonial pragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1451–1459.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. (eds.) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flöck, I. & Geluykens, R. (2018). Preference Organization and Cross-Cultural Variation in Request Responses: A Corpus-Based Comparison of British and American English. Corpus Pragmatics 2, 57–82.
Flöck, I. (2016). Requests in American and British English: A contrastive multi-method analysis. John Benjamins.
Forsberg, Fanny Lundell & Erman Britt, (2012). High-level requests: A study of long residency L2 users of English and French and native speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 44, Issues 6–7, 756-775.
Janney, R. (2009). Pragmatics in postcolonial contexts: For Paul Mbangwana. Annals of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Yaoundé I (Special edition in Honour of Professor Paul N. Mbangwana), 101–108.
Mulo Farenkia, B. (2024). Socio-pragmatic variation in Cameroon French requests. European Journal of Literature, Language, and Linguistic Studies, Vol 8(1), 18-40.
Napoli, V. (2021). Requests in film dialogue and dubbing translation. A comparative study of English and Italian. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Newcastle.
Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23.
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.
Thompson, S. A., Fox, B., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2015). Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics. Requests, complaints, and apologies. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


