THE DISTINCTIONS OF VERBS OF STEALING AMONG ARABIC-ENGLISH TRANSLATORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejmts.v3i1.435Keywords:
cross-linguistic influence, lexicalization patterns, translation equivalents, linguistic relativity, conceptual transferAbstract
This paper investigates the distinctions of verbs of stealing among Arabic-English translators. First, the four verbs selected for this study were ‘shoplift’, ‘rob’, ‘burglarize’, and ‘heist’. Second, visual stimuli for four verbs of stealing were developed along with their dimensions of distinctions. Six participants were presented with these visual stimuli and were asked to describe them in Arabic and English, along with their respective definitions. Semantic analysis of the English naming pattern revealed that the participants had not demonstrated any knowledge with regard to the English-based dimensions of meaning for the four respective verbs, showing no consistent distinctions among them. Rather, these participants used general English verbs to describe more specific actions, a pattern that was emulated in their Arabic naming pattern, which might suggest conceptual transfer. The only verb that generated the best answers in English was the verb ‘rob’ and that might be due to the exact lexicalization pattern in both English and Arabic in the sense both use single-verb format to express the same idea. This result suggested the positive effects of the one-to-one lexicalization pattern of the L1 on the acquisition of L2 verbs whereas the more-to-one lexicalization patterns had negative effects.
References
Bogaards, P. (1996). Dictionaries for learners of English. International Journal of Lexicography, 9(4), 277–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/9.4.277
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic Influence in language and cognition. Routledge.
Majid, A. (2011). A guide to stimulus‐based elicitation for semantic categories. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.013.0003
Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic Relations and the lexicon: An extralexical approach. Cambridge University Press.
Nüse, R. (n.d.). Segmenting event sequences for speaking. Mediating between Concepts and Grammar. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110919585.255
Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual Representation in the Bilingual Lexicon and Second Language Vocabulary Learning. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 125–160). essay, Multilingual Matters.
Rundell, M. (1999). Dictionary use in production. International Journal of Lexicography, 12(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/12.1.35
Stutterheim, C. von, & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41(5). https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.028
von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B. (2012). How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0026
